Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Part Two of Session 9 of Course 14

When a superstring gains mass due to a Lorentz-Four-Contraction, it does not gain as many bosonic superstrings as one would think, when based on the directly related increase in mass.  As a superstring is contracted in length, due to any given arbitrary Lorentz-Four-Contraction, the inverse-based leverage that is directly due to the said contraction is part of what works to increase the mass of the respective given arbitrary phenomenon that is accellerated to a given respective faster velocity.  This often may mean a certain amount of added two-dimensional superstrings that here work to fascillitate the corelative increase in mass, yet, the inverse-based leverage that I have mentioned here is often what mainly works to cause the said respective increase of mass.  Think of it this way:  If something is comprised of many superstrings that bear two of the same spatial measures when in terms of scalar amplitude, yet, the directly related length of the given arbitrary superstrings will here be contracted to the same extent as corresponds to the directly related LFC, then, the wave-tug/wave-pull of the two non-contracted spatial dimensions -- that would here be related -- will bear a leverage upon the corelative contracted spatial dimension.  Yet, this leverage will often require at least some added two-dimensional superstrings in the said phenomenon that is contracted -- in order to fascillitate at least some form of covariant basis of the said inverse-based leverage. Yet, as the nucleus increases to one given arbitrary degree of LFC, the electrons of the same atom that is being contracted as such will eminently increase -- in terms of those two-dimensional superstrings that work to comprise it -- to the same proportional euclidean-based amount.  (Not to be confused with the same Hodge-based amount.)  This is with one given arbitrary atom.  The mechanics of different directly associated atoms that are of the same general phenomenon, that are given the same degree of Lorentz-Four-Contraction, but, are at different loci -- that work to form something at a more macroscopic level -- will not necessarily increase in mass via the exact same genus of mechanism.  I will continue with part three tomorrow.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

No comments: