Spatial Dimensionality Of Neutrinos

In league with my particular model of string theory; Neutrinos tend to work to bear both a Riemann metric component, And, a Nijenhuis metric component. Although the Riemann metric component of a neutrino, tends to work to bear a lack of spatial dimensionality; The Nijenhuis metric component of a neutrino, tends to work to bear 12 spatial dimensions. This is facilitated, in part, on account of a phenomenology, that I call, the proximal local presence, of, "The Double-Helicit Calabi-Yau Manifold." For Instance; Do you recall how, at a reverse-fractal tense, DNA exists, as a double-helicit holonomy of topological manifold? Now; Take this down to the superstring-related level. Imagine a tense of a double-helix, yet, in this particular case, think of this in terms of the windings of superstring-related phenomenology. Even though such a supposed holonomic structure, were here, in a way, to have the workings, of a 12 spatial dimensional framework, the expressed nature of such a "double-helix" of a Calabi-Yau space, would work to form a tense of a Mobius-Related inter-relationship, as taken at the Poincare level, to the internal reference-frame of the relative Riemann vantage-point, when in relation, to the Poincare level of the internal reference-frame of the relative Nijenhuis vantage-point. Such an inferred tense, of a "Mobius-Related inter-relationship," would therefore have the tendency, of making the holonomic presence of the metric-gauge-related source, that is here to be of the angular momentum of such a neutrino, appear, via detection, to be "dimensionless," in spite of the physical condition, that at the perspective, that is Poincare to the internal reference-frame of the Nijehuis exhibition of such a neutrino, in a way, is here, instead, to be of a 12 spatial dimensional holonomic framework.THANK YOU! TO BE CONTINUED!SINCERELY, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH.