Legendre Homology And De Rham Cohomology

 Let us consider two different scenarios, of conveyed discrete mass-bearing energy quanta. One of such respective given arbitrary “scenarios,” is to work to bear a tense of a directly corresponding mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, of which is to be conveyed by an isotropically stable Legendre (co)homology; whereas, the other inferred respective given arbitrary “scenario,” is to work to bear a directly corresponding mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, of which is to be conveyed by an isotropically unstable Legendre (co)homology. Otherwise, both of these two scenarios, as to the conveyance of a set of mass-bearing discrete energy quanta, — are basically of the same nature. That given respective scenario of the two, that is to involve a mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta — that is here to involve its directly corresponding conveyance, via the kinematic spatial translation of an isotropically stable Legendre (co)homology, via a correlative Fourier Transformation, will consequently tend to have a greater probability of working to involve a resultant De Rham cohomology, than the other given respective case scenario, — of which is here, instead, to tend to have a greater probability of working to involve its conveyance of a mass-bearing cohesive set of discrete energy quanta, via the kinematic spatial translation of an isotropically unstable Legendre (co)homology — in so as to be more likely to tend to work to form a Dubeault cohomology . TO BE CONTINUED! Sincerely, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. (1989)!