Group Action And Magnetism

 Let us initially consider two different unique mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta.  Both of which are here to be of the same quantum of mass; as well as the given arbitrary physical condition, that both of such said sets of discrete energy quanta, are, as well, to work to bear the same innate tendency of working to exhibit a De Rham cohomology.  Furthermore; both of such respective mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta,  are also to tend to work to bear both the same charge, as well as working to bear the same basic means, of translating the exhibition of the externalized transversal component of their Fourier-related spatial delineation, over a fairly transient covariant relativistic duration of time, that is here to be simultaneous in comparison to one another — as this is to occur, via the vantage-point of a central coni-point.  The main difference in the behavior of these two said cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, is that one of such sets of cohesive discrete energy, is to bear a reductional tense of group action — by working to bear a tense of isotropic stability; whereas, the other of such said respective given arbitrary mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, is to work to bear a tense of isotropic instability. That stated set of discrete energy quanta (mass-bearing cohesive set), that is here to be of a tense of isotropic stability, will tend to result in working to display a relatively higher scalar amplitude of a fractal of magnetism, than the other of such said mass-bearing cohesive sets of discrete energy quanta, — of which, instead, is consequently to result in working to bear a lower scalar amplitude of a fractal of magnetism. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.