Clifford Expansion Versus Euclidean Compression

A given arbitrary Ward-Cauchy-related Clifford Expansion, that works to involve a tense of a substringular divergence, tends to work to involve a tense of a general genus of a Cevita interaction; whereas -- a given arbitrary Ward-Cauchy-related euclidean compression, that works to involve a tense of a substringular convergence, tends to work to involve a tense of a general genus of a Wess-Zumino interaction.  This is because any given arbitrary Ward-Cauchy-related Clifford Expansion, that works to involve a tense of a substringular divergence, works to involve a tense of a Rayleigh scattering (to where the adjacent scattered eigenindices, are here to tend to bear an odd parity); whereas -- any given arbitrary Ward-Cauchy-related euclidean compression, that works to involve a tense of a substringular convergence, tends to work to involve a tense of a Riemann scattering (to where the adjacent scattered eigenindices, are here to tend to bear an even parity.) To Be Continued!Sam Roach.