Superstringular Couplings And The Betti Number

If the angular momentum of a superstring -- as it is just about to enter an iteration of BRST -- is such, to where there were theoretically to be merely a coupling between the norm-to-forward-holomorphic end And the norm-to-reverse-holomorphic end of such a so-eluded-to superstring of discrete energy permittivity, then this would tend to work to form the proximal local generation of an even compactification of spatial dimensionality (a compactification that is here to involve a reduction in an even number of spatial dimensions), -- to where this would then work to be correlative to a even positive Betti Number.  Furthermore -- if the angular momentum of a superstring -- as it is just about to enter an iteration of BRST -- is such, to where there were to theoretically to be merely a coupling between the Nijenhuis-to-forward-holomorphic end And the Nijenhuis-to-reverse-holomorphic end of such a so-eluded-to superstring of discrete energy permittivity, then this would tend to work to form the proximal local generation of an odd compactification of spatial dimensionality (a compactification that is here to involve a reduction in an odd number of spatial dimensions), -- to where this would then work to be correlative to an odd positive Betti Number.  Now -- when such a theoretical activity is to be directly associated with a reversal in the chirality of such a general tense of a multiplicit coupling (such as would be the case during the Regge Action), then, this would then work to involve a decompactification in spatial dimensionality (to where there would then be an increase in the number of spatial dimensions present.)
Sam Roach.