Let us initially consider two different orbifold eigensets, that are to strike the field-density of one another in a Gliosis-based manner -- over a relatively transient duration of time. Both of such individually taken orbifold eigensets, are to here be quite similar in their topological structure -- at a Sterling Approximation, except that one of the two said orbifold eigensets, is to bear a relatively looser tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, than the other of the two said orbifold eigensets - over an immediately prior group-metric, that is to here be of a relatively transient manner. If all of the other Ward-Caucy conditions, that are of the two so-stated orbifold eigensets, is to here be of the same nature-- then, that orbifold eigenset, that was mentioned as to here be of the nature as to having an attribute of working to bear a relatively looser tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode -- is to here, tend to bear a larger scalar amplitude of a Ward-Caucy-based Hamiltonian pulse, and thereby is to, as well, go into the process as to tending to bear a larger scalar magnitude of a substringular tense of "momentum." This will then, tend to work to cause that orbifold eigenset, that is to here bear a looser tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, and thereby to bear a higher scalar magnitude of a substringular tense of a Ward-Caucy-based momentum, -- to then tend to bear a greater tense of a topological sway, and thereby to, as well, to then tend to "win-out," as to work to bear the advantage, as to work to determine the resultant predominant holomorphic wave-tug, over the immediately ensuing sequential series of group-related instantons.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment