Let us initially say that there are two different orbifold eigensets, that are both of the same general constitution, as well as of the same Hodge-Index as to the general quanta of energy that are to work to comprise the two so-eluded-to eigensets, as well as working to bear the same directoral-based tense of its Lagrangian-based propagation, that are then of the same general genus, that are both of a Noether-based flow, that work to bear two different radial-based velocities -- at the vantage-point of a central Lorentz-based conipoint, yet, to where, these two so-eluded-to eigensets are to bear the same relative transversal-based velocity -- at the vantage-point of a central Lorentz-based conipoint, -- over a set gauged metric, that is both covariant, codeterminable, and codifferentiable, over a sequential series of group-related instantons. This will then work to determine the condition, that, even though both of such said orbifold eigensets are to then to tend to here be of the condition, as to working to bear the exact same general scalar amplitude as to both the degree and/or the manner as to how loose and/or how tight the transversel eigenbase of the directly correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode of both of such said orbifold eigensets is, during the set group-metric, yet, both of such orbifold eigensets are to then to tend here to be of the condition, as to working to bear a different general scalar amplitude as to the degree and/or the manner as to how loose and/or how tight the radial eigenbase of the directly correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode of both of such said orbifold eigensets is, over the set group-metric. I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment