A phenomenology is Gliosis upon another phenomenology, when there is a direct topological contact, that will work here to bear a borne tangency at the relative Poincare level. A phenomenology is Yukawa upon another phenomenology, when there is either a non-direct or a direct topological contact, that is not necessarily a borne tangency at the relative Poincare level. Not every superstring is always in a Gliosis-based relationship with the general Ward-Caucy-based condition of the Kahler-Metric, all of the time, yet, -- every superstring is always going to tend to be in a Yukawa-based relationship with the general Ward-Caucy-based condition of the Kahler-Metric, all of the time. This is due to the condition, that individually taken superstrings do not need to literally be constantly in the process of re-attaining there fractals of discrete energy quanta with no relent, yet, the process of that general-based Fourier-related activity of the re-attaining of the fractals of discrete energy quanta are to be happening "all over the place" in the substringular "all of the time." The higher the scalar amplitude is of the Yukawa-related wave-tug -- that is to be enacted upon any respective given arbitrary discrete energy quantum by the activity of the Kahler-Metric, the sooner that there is to be that general Fourier-based activity of the said respective discrete energy quantum, to be undergoing the processes of working to re-attain the fractals of its discrete energy. Once that such a Yukawa-based coupling is to then be of a Gliosis-based nature, then, this so-eluded-to Kahler-Metric-related eigenstate is to then be eminent. Therefore, there is always the presence of the Kahler-Metric upon the holonomic substrate of the multiplicit array of substringular eigenstates.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment