Some Stough As To Doubolt Versus Rham Cohomologies

The general condition of there being the presence of a Rham cohomology, is always a temporary Ward-Caucy-based condition.  Any given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, is going to eventually be tugged into either a Real Reimmanian-based and/or a Njenhuis-based Chern-Simons condition -- that will work to form an antiholomorphic Kahler-based condition, -- of which will form the general ensuing Ward-Caucy-based condition of there then being the proximal localized state of the Kahler-Metric, that will then be implemented upon the said respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, in a Yukawa-based manner, over time.  Any "time" that there is the presence of an antiholomorphic Kahler condition -- from the Ward-Caucy-based Laplacian state that is to here exist, from "right before" until "right after" the Fourier-related activity of any respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, that is to proceed to go through what is to here involve the presence of a Chern-Simons singularity -- that is to reverse the general directoral-based flow of the said orbifold eigenset, -- this will happen to where there is to then be such a perturbation of the cohomology of such an orbifold eigenset, from initially being of a Rham-based cohomology, to then being of a Doubolt-based cohomology.  Such a general tendency of a directoral-based perturbation, will tend to always work to eventually be Yukawa upon any respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, over time.  So, superstrings tend to exist under the Ward-Caucy-based conditions -- of what will here tend to be the existence of what may be called of as the mappable tracings of Doubolt cohomologies.  The state of Rham-based cohomologies will always tend to be temporary.

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.