Tendency Of Rham Versus Doubolt

If an electron is moving through a d-field, that is to here be involved with the translation of the said electron to be delineated here via six spatial dimensions plus time -- then, it will tend to both be Yau-Exact, as well as such a so-eluded-to discrete metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator to here be working to form a Rham-based cohomological mappable tracing, -- since the said electron will here be changing in only as many derivatives as the number of spatial dimensions that it will be going through, in such a case, over the directly corresponding sequential series of instantons, by which the said electron will be translated through.  Yet, if the said electron is to either spike in either its Lagrangian-based translation and/or in its metrical-based translation, and/or if the said electron is to increase in the number of spatial dimensions that it is to here be traveling through -- then, such a so-stated tense of a discrete Hamiltonian operator, will often be altered in so as to then be working to spontaneously form the course of a Doubolt-based cohomological mappable tracing, -- over the ensuing metrical-based grouping of such a sequential series of instantons.  This will then work to form an occasional mode, as to what would tend to be of a Yau-Exact phenomenology -- to then work to bear at least one set of Chern-Simons-related index-based roots. Such Chern-Simons affiliated roots, will tend to be of an Imaginary-based eigenbase, -- If the spike that works to form such a tense of a so-eluded-to aberation -- is of a Njenhuis nature, over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.