The relative codifferentiable rate of one given arbitrary respective tense of a second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate, is to be taken to the sixth power -- while the relative codifferentiable comparison as to the scalar amplitude of the amount of mini-stringular segmentation, that is here to be fed-into the self-same said second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate -- is to be taken to the first power. So, how does this work to compare the condition, as to how many times as many Schwinger-Indices or gravity waves are to here be produced by the plucking of one respective given arbitrary second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate, of a discrete quantum that is of a Kaluza-Klein topology, versus the condition as to how many times less Schwinger-Indices or gravity waves are to here be produced by the plucking of one respective given arbitrary second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is of a discrete quantum -- that is of a Yang-Mills topology?
Let us say that a given arbitrary second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is of a Kaluza-Klein topology, is to work to bear one-half of the scalar amplitude of mini-stringular segmentation -- that is to be fed-into its immediate Ward-Caucy bounds, than a covariant-based comparitive second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is of a Yang-Mills topology, yet, the said eigenstate of a Kaluza-Klein topology, is to here vibrate at twice the relative rate as the said eigenstate of a Yang-Mills topology. (This would probably not happen literally, yet, this is just to give you an idea.) Two to the sixth power is 64. Two to the first power is 2. This would mean, in this given metaphorical case, that the said eigenstate of a Kaluza-Klein topology of this case, would then tend to form 32 times as many Schwinger-Indices -- than the said eigenstate of a Yang-Mills topology of this case.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment