If an equation that treats a time-oriented cartesian-based quotient of mathematical expression to be equal to a time-oriented polar-based quotient of mathematical expression, to where this is solvable as an even function, -- that works to bear an eigenbase that is Gaussian for either a Real Reimmanian space or for a Njenhuis space -- in so as to initially bear a general value of setting "gnu" (pronounced as "nu") to a scalar magnitude of 1/((2)^.5)(of whatever the specific units are of the respective given arbitrary case), so that between four and ten spatial dimensions may then be solved for as being directoral-based space-time coordinates, that will thus, in such a general genus of a case, work to plot the net Lagrangian that is to be solve for, once one has the so-eluded-to tense of the so-eluded-to four to ten Noether-based space-time-coordinates to be plotted towards one general net locus, to where this will form a space-time translation that is to happen over the course of a here proscribed set of a certain integer-based iterations of group-related instantons. (Let us say 3*10^8 consecutive of such instantons.) If the so-eluded-to space is Gaussian in either a Real Reimmanian or in a Njenhuis manner, then, it may be properly solved for as a Calabi-related space. Yet, if the so-eluded-to space is not Gaussian in either a Real Reimmanian or in a Njenhuis manner, then, it is of no actual potential tense as a delineation of a superstring, via a Calabi-based translation of those core-field-based indices of the topological transfer, that are of those coniaxial-based eigenstates, that come together in so as to work to make-up the holonomic substrate of a propagated superstring over time.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment