10) Generally, when one is to refer to superstrings, one is to here be referring to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity. Permittivity has more to do with the magnetic field than the electric field. This would then mean, that superstrings are directly associated with the pointal characteristics of the fractal modulae of phenomenology -- whereas, the immediate counterparts of superstrings, or, in other words, the correlative counterstrings -- are directly associated with the wave-based characteristics of the fractal modulae of phenomenology. One prime example of this, on a reverse-"fractal"-based manner -- is iron. Iron is highly magnetic, and, iron tends to have a higher fractal modulus than an elastic modulus. Whereas, generally, when one is to refer to the Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates, one is to here be referring to discrete quanta of energy impedance. Impedance has more to do with the electric field than the magnetic field. This would then mean that Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are directly associated with the pointal characteristics of the elastic modulae of phenomenology -- whereas, the immediate light-cone-gauge eigenstates that work to inter-bind the said Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates with the correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are directly associated with the wave-based characteristics of the elastic modulae of phenomenology. One prime example of this, on a reverse-"fractal"-based manner -- is water. Water has a high ability to transfer charge, and, water has a higher elastic modulus than a fractal modulus.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment