Part 7 Of Session 1 Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

Just as any respective given arbitrary electron drops an energy level, this general tense of activity -- of which works to bear an antiholomorphic Kahler condition -- will, at this point in activity, work to initiate a directly corresponding Wick Action eigenstate.  This said Wick Action eigenstate will then ensue to work to form a correlative Landau-Gisner Action eigenstate.  The holonomic substrate of what is to here act in so as to work to perform the so-stated Landau-Gisner Action eigenstate, will then work to cause what may be called of here as an eigenstate of the here proximal local Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism.  The just mentioned Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism, will then work to push the directly corresponding holonomic substrate of the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate -- in so as to move this just mentioned eigenstate -- in what will here be in the relative norm-to-forward-holomorphic direction, in so as to work to move the so-stated holonomic substrate of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate -- into that general region of the relative Real Reimmanian Plane, so that those discrete quanta of energy, that are to here be in the need of re-attaining their fractals of discrete energy quanta, will be in such a substringular position, in so as to be facilitated to be able to then undergo their respective Gliosis-based interaction with the said holonomic substrate of the correlative eigenstate of the Klein Bottle.  This so-stated activity of the Kahler-Metric eigenstate, will happen just after the said electron that is to here be releasing its spare kinetic energy, has to have then just dropped that correlative energy level, that is here being discussed.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part 6 Of Session One Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

When an electron drops back-and-forth in energy levels -- this general genus of activity, works to form an antiholomorphic Kahler condition.  This is on account of the condition, that such a said electron is to here immediately reverse in the general relative holomorphic direction -- as it works to drop an energy level.  Such a so-stated antiholomorphic Kahler condition, works to then cause the ensuing activity of a proximal localized Kahler-Metric.  This will then tend to work at helping to cause the emission -- of what is to then exist from within the Ward-Caucy bounds of the here directly pertinent electron, as the spare energy that is to here be brought into and then out of the so-stated electron, on account of the initial quantum leap back-and-forth of the said electron, to and fro the respective given arbitrary energy levels. The here ensuing activity of the so-eluded-to eigenstate of the proximal localized Kahler-Metric, will then work to help at bringing in the local Yukawa-based interaction -- of those two individually taken zero-norm-state-projections, that will then act, in so as to help in the process of the ensuing eigenstate of the respective correlative Fujikawa Coupling via the Green Function, in so as to help in the process of working to form a photon.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Five Of Session 1 Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds and Calabi Interactions

As one one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity is being released from the Ward-Caucy bounds, of any respective one directly corresponding electron -- the local centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure eigenstate, that is most directly affiliated with the locally associated Fourier-based differentiation, that is of the said respective electron -- is relatively discombobulated from its immediately prior condition.  The thence caused decrease in the need, as to the amount of kinetic energy that the correlative electron is to then have, is to then result in the just previously stated relative discombobulation.  Such a so-eluded-to back-and-forth wave-tug, that is applied to the Ward-Caucy-based conditions of the here pertinent electron, happens -- as it is to be tugged from initially  moving inward into then immediately moving outward -- of which works to help in causing the tendency of such a released discrete quantum of energy, to then be pushed into that directoral-based holomorphicity, that is in the opposite relative direction from that by which the correlative nucleus of the directly pertinent atom is in.  Such a drop, in and of itself -- in the corresponding energy level of the directly corresponding electron, will then act at such a rate --  by which the specific one-dimensional strand of energy, that is to here be released, will then tend to be brought to the "outskirts" of the Ward-Caucy bounds of the correlative electron, as a fully contracted open strand of kinetic spacial disturbance.  As the said open strand of fully contracted kinetic energy, is to then be in the process of being pushed-out of the correlative electron, the two individually taken zero-norm-state -projections that both work -- in so as to tie the two ends of the initially stated one-dimensional superstring together, in so as to work to form a photon from the now released kinetic energy -- this of which has here been emitted from the so-stated electron, to where the process itself of the Fujikawa Coupling via the mathematical conditions that may be eluded-to by the Green Function, work to help in so as to provide that needed additional thrust, to the said emitted discrete quantum of kinetic energy, -- in so to then work to cause the then formed photon, of which is one discrete quantum of electromagnetic energy, to result in going at the speed of light -- when this is taken in multi-consideration with the directly associated Ward-Caucy-based conditions, that are to here be correlative to the locally proximal state, that may be associated with Snell's Law.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Four Of Session 1 Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

Bosonic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, work to bear a circumference that is equal in a Laplacian-based manner -- to a scalar amplitude that is of the equivalence to the Planck Length.  For instance, the Laplacian-based length of any respective given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is of the scalar amplitude of one Planck Length.  Whereas, the Laplacian-based circumference of any respective given arbitrary two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is of the same Sterling approximation of scalar amplitude of one Planck Length.   Photons have a circumstance, that is equivalent in scalar amplitude -- to the length of a fully contracted one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity.  For instance, when any given arbitrary respective one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- that is of the directly corresponding circumstance of a discrete quantum of energy, that is released as the spare energy that is emitted from a photon that has jut dropped an energy level -- has just worked to leave the Ward-Caucy bounds of the physical bounds of the said respective electron, the so-stated one-dimensional superstring works to undergo what may be termed of as the Fujikawa Coupling, via the correlative math that may be extrapolated as what is termed of as the Green Function.  What this entails in general, is that the so-eluded-to open strand of discrete energy permittivity, is to here be propagated from the general Ward-Caucy bounds of the electron, in such a manner to where the directly corresponding end-points of what was the initially considered as of the said one-dinensional string, are to then be pulled together in a hermitian-based manner, -- to where these said endpoints are to here be drawn together In the relative holomorphic direction At the relative reverse-holomorphic side of such a so-eluded-to substringular projection of Hamiltonian-based motion, by which these ends are to then come together, in so as to work to form what is to then become the holonomic substrate of one discrete photon.  It is the holonomic substrate of two covariant, codeterminable, codifferentiable respective given arbitrary zero-norm-state-projections, that are to here act upon both respective individually taken ends of the so-stated initially mentioned one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittiivty, that act in so as to work to push these said end points into each other--  in so as to work to form a closed loop from the so-eluded-to initially inferred open-loop, in so as to work to form one discrete quantum of electromagnetic energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

An Addition To The 3rd Part Of Session 1 Of Course 20

During any given arbitrary iteration of BRST, at any of one respective given arbitrary substringular loci -- the superstring of discrete energy permittivity of any respective case, and its correlative counterstring, bear both a covariant, a codeterminable, and a codifferentiable tense of oscillation, that is of a tightly-knit Fourier-based assymetric generation of their respective permutative indices -- as both the so-stated superstring and its correlative counterstring, will work here to decompactify, during the course of their dual scalar amplitude of the correlative eigenstate of the Polyakov Action, to the inverse of what their directly corresponding Lorentz-Four-Contraction happens to be -- during the course of the so-eluded-to iteration of BRST, of which is applicable at the so-eluded-to proximal localization at which such an iteration of instanton is to be happening at.  This tendency of a dual Fourier-based tense of an assymetric-related covariant-based spinning nature, is even more of an exemplification of the qualitative means of the Pauli Exclusion Principle, than the condition of the Laplacian-based assymetric delineation of the eigen-related discrepencies of one respective superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- when this is taken in comparison to the delineation of the eigen-related discrepencies of the directly corresponding counterstring.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part 3 of Session 1 of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

The holonomic substrate-based discrepencies of any respective given arbitrary counterstirng, work to bear a Laplacian-based assymmetry to the holonomic substrate-based discrepencies -- of any correlative respective given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity.  This then eludes-to the condition, that, during BRST, the said discrepencies of a counterstring work to bear a complementary norm-state basis of their Laplacian-based delineation, to the said discrepencies of the correlative superstring that it is pairing-up with the said counterstring -- during the so-eluded-to iteration,  of which works to act as one individually taken increment of pulse, of the discrete energy quanta of the Ultimon.  Such an assymetry, acts as a fractal -- at a very small scale, of the condition, as to that adjacent electrons tend to always spin assymetrically, which eludes-to here as the Pauli-Exclusion Principle.
To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Two Of Session 1 Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

A closed-looped superstring of discrete energy permittivity,is generally a two-dimensional superstring.  A couterstring that is correlative to a two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- that is positioned during BRST at a spot that is just to the relative holomorphic side of the said closed string -- works to bear "substringular discrepencies" that are positioned during BRST, at a spot, that is at the opposite side of the "substringular discrepencies" that are of the so-stated two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity of any respective given arbitrary case, as the said superstring is homotopically attached to the said counterstring, during the course of any individually taken iteration of BRST.  During BRST. the mentioned discrepencies of the said counterstirng, work to bear orphoganal-Ward-Caucy-based conditions to the here mentionedscrepencies of the here said superstirng of such a respective given arbitrary case -- as the so-stated counterstring is here to be positioned at a spot that is, again, just to the relative holomorphic side of the spot where the said superstring is at.  The individually taken first-ordered point particles that work to comprise a counterstring work to bear a relatively high Hodge-Index of mini-stringular segmentation, that is stemmed at the Gliosis-based topological stratum of each of such eigenindices that work to comprise the said respective counterstring. Whereas, the individually takenfirst-ordered point particles that work to comprise a superstring, work to bear a relatively minimal Hodge-Index of mini-stringular segmentatino, that is stemmed at the Gliosis-based topological stratum of each of such eigenindices that work to comprise the said respective superstring.  This is part of as to why, superstrings of discrete energy permittivity work to act as the holonomic substrate that is of the particle-based nature of discrete quanta of energy permittivity -- while the correlatiev counterstrings of discrete energy permittiivty work to act as the holonomic substrate that is of the wave-based nature of discrete quanta of energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part One Of Session One Of Course 20 -- Calabi Manifolds And Calabi Interactions

Light is the most well-known form of electromagnetic energy.  What is normally thought of as light, is what is known of as visible light.  The basis of visible light, is known of as white light.  Electromagnetic energy is energy that fluctuates, in both its electric field and in its magnetic field.  Depending upon how you look at it, electromagnetic energy may be viewed of as an energy, electromagnetic energy may be viewed of as a wave, and/or, electromagnetic energy may be viewed of as a particle.  Electromagnetic energy is a kinetic form of energy.  Electromagnetic energy is propagated in waves.  The individual particles of electromagnetic energy, exist in tiny little packets that are known of as photons.  Photons are discrete particles.  A photon consists of, as a discrete form of energy -- a topological substrate, that consists of individually taken bosonic superstrings, as their basis for that discrete energy permittivity that works to make these up.  As usual, such so-eluded-to discrete packets of closed-loops -- that work to help to form the discrete energy permittivity that comprises these particle-like phenomenology that are photons, when individually taken -- work to bear a counterstring at its immediate relative forward holomorphic side, as well as a Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate at is immediate relative reverse holomorphic side.  As with other superstrings of discrete energy permittiivity -- the so-stated superstring works to form the Laplacian-founded basis of the particle-based nature of its discrete energy permittivity, the correlative counterstring works to form the Laplacian-founded basis of the wave-based nature of its discrete energy permittivity, the so-stated Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate works to form the Laplacian-founded basis of the particle-based nature of its discrete energy impedance, and, the so-stated first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate works to form the Laplacian-founded basis of the wave-based nature of its discrete energy impedance.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The 14th Test Solution To The Last Test Of Course 19

14)  The initial Fourier-based activity that I am to describe of, as to the Klein Bottle eigenstate -- is of appertaining to the holonomic substrate of a said individually taken Klein Bottle eigenstate.  As a respective given arbitrary Higgs Boson eigenstate is working to help move the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate, into the norm-to-holomorphic direction at the start of the Kahler-Metric, the so-stated Higgs Boson eigenstate is situated at the relative center of the  norm-to-holomorphic end of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate -- as such a so-eluded-to Fourier-based activity is in the process of moving the said Klein Bottle eigenstate, into the relative range of the Real Reimmanian Plane that is here to be directly associated with the Fourier-based activity of those correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittiivty, that are, as eigenindices of the correlative one or more orbifold eigensets that are to here be directly associated, to undergo the so-stated Kahler-Metric.  Once the said Klein Bottle eigenstate has reached the so-stated relative tense of the here local Real Reimmanian Plane, the correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate is to then angle at 22.5 degrees -- in such a manner that is here to be subtended between the relative holomorphic and the relative norm-to-holomorphic direction, by which the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to ensue upon moving into.  Later on, as the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to then be moving back into the relative reverse-holomorphic direction, the correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate is to then angle at 22.5 degrees -- in such a manner that is here to be subtended subtended between the relative reverse holomorphic and the relative norm-to-holomrphic direction, by which the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to ensue upon moving into.  Once that the said Klein Bottle eigenstate has re-reached the initial spot as to the locus of where it had started to move upon the respective relative Real Reimmanian Plane, by which it had started to bear its Gliosis-based relationship to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that were to enter into its Ward-Neumman bounds, in-between the individually taken increments of the here successive correlative iterations of BRST and the Regge Action eigenstates -- the correlative Higgs Boson eigenstate is to then be translated into bearing in the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction, as this so-stated Higgs Boson eigenstate is to now be located, in a Laplacian-based manner, at the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic positioning of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate. The 382nd to the 384th iterations of the correlative Kahler-Metric eigenmetric, work to reposition the Klein Bottle eigenstate, in such a manner by which it may strategically enter its ensuing eigenmetric of the Kahler-Metric.  This general format of activity, works to map-out a cohomological mappable tracing of a relatively deep bag-like bottle, that bears a handle that may be mapped-out at 22.5 degrees in the relative (-ihat, +zhat) direction, as the Klein Bottle is entering the Real Reimmanian Plane of the Kahler-Metric.  And as the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate is to act in so as to leave this relative Real Reimmanian Plane, this will work to map-out a cohomological mappable tracing of a relatively deep bag-like bottle, that bears a handle that may now be mapped-out at 22.5 degrees in the relative (+ihat, -zhat) direction.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Test Solution 13 To The Last Test Of Course 19

13)  Here is a general summary, as to the manner by which the eigenindices of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity are recycled.:  Every unfrayed superstring of discrete energy permittivity, during instanton -- has 10^43 first-ordered point particles, that work to bear the general composition of the topological substrate of each of such individually taken so-stated superstrings.  During each individually taken iteration of the corresponding intervals of BRST, there is to be one first-ordered point particle, that is of the topological stratum of one of such respective given arbitrary so-eluded-to superstrings of discrete energy -- that is to be replaced by what was immediately prior as a point commutator, in a manner that is of an indistinguishably different means of replacement.  In the meanwhile, there is simultaneously, via the vantage-point of a central conipoint, the indistinguishably different replacement of the so-eluded-to point commutator, by the homotopic residue of the holonomic substrate, of what was immediately prior, of the existence of an eigenindex of the said respective correlative superstring of discrete energy permittivity.  This general format of activity is to here go on for about 10^43 instantons, afterwhich, the topological stratum of the so-stated superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is to be then tend to be entirely indistinguishably replaced, via the recycling of norm-to-ground-states and vice-versa.  This may be viewed of as the general idea behind what may be thought of as the recycling of homotopic residue -- in the substringular.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Test Solution 12 To The Last Test Of Course 19

12)  Let us consider an orbifold eigenset, that is to here be currently undergoing the process of the Kahler-Metric.   Let us say that the said respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, is to then be currently moving in a tachyonic manner.  Let us say that -- over the whole general course of such a respective group-based activity of the Kahler-Metric, that the said orbifold eigenset will be moving in the so-eluded-to manner, that is to then not be of the tendency of the motion of a Noether-based flow, over the directly correlative duration of time by which such a set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform one specific function, is to be going through such a so-eluded-to group-metric.  In so long as such an eigenset is to fully go through the said duration of the Kahler-Metric -- the directly corresponding orbifold will then be going through those 384 iterations of group-related instanton, that are to be related to a flow that is of the Kahler-Metric, although the so-stated orbifold eigenset will be directly associated with an indistinguishably different specific substringular neighborhood or substringular region -- over the course of each succeeding iteration of group-related instanton, in which the said orbifold eigenset is to be going through each successful ensuing step, that is here to be related to the successive series of the Kahler-Metric.
I will continue with the suspense later!   To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To Discrete Quanta Entering Holonomic Substrate Of Klein Bottle Eigenstate

As The Kahler-Metric is Yukawa to the topological stratum of an orbifold eigenset of discrete energy quanta, the directly associated discrete quanta of energy that are to work to inter-mingle with the Ward-Caucy-based bounds of the holonomic substrate of the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate -- immediately after each individually taken iteration of BRST -- fall into the Ward-Neumman bounds of the said respective given arbitrary Klein Bottle eigenstate, in so as to then shake back-and-forth eight overall times (primarily from the relative holomorphic direction to the relative reverse-holomorphic direction and back again, a total of eight times until the completion of such a "shaking"), in so as to work to help the so-eluded-to discrete quanta of energy, to reattain one fractal of the cross between both discrete energy permittivity and discrete energy impedance, -- right before finishing up in the process of one iteration of group-related instanton, by then participating in the gauge-metric of the directly affiliated correlative iteration of the Regge Action. As discrete energy quanta work to enter the "shuffleing," so-to-speak, upon the Ward-Neumman bounds of the said holonomic substrate, that is of the respective Klein Bottle eigenstate -- then, those individually taken norm-state-projections, that had initially worked to bear what would have tended to be a purely harmonic Reimman-based distribution, will then be pushed into a resultant Rayleigh-based scattering, -- at the Poinare level to the Gliosis-based topological stratum of those norm-state-projections, that had initially been in what would have started out as bearing both a homeomorphic and a homogeneous distribution. The activity of both the shaking of the discrete quanta of energy, that had just entered into the Ward-Neumman bounds of the so-stated holonomic substrate of the respective Klein Bottle eigenstate, along with the process of the said discrete quanta of energy being temporarily scattered in an annharmonic manner, -- works to imbue the needed individually taken fractal of discrete energy quanta, upon the topological substrate of those "packets" of energy that need to go into the process of both persisting and existing, in the ensuing Ultimon Flow.  Once that discrete energy quanta leave the Ward-Neumman bounds of the so-stated holonomic substrate of the respective eigenstate of the Klein Bottle, the general motion that the substringular realm bears, during the then eminent Regge Action -- will then work to cause the eigenindices of the said Klein Bottle eigenstate, to then perform a Reimman-based scattering, -- in so as to bring these said eigenstates back into a condition of being both of a homeomorphic and of a homogeneous nature, at the Poincare level to the topological surface of the so-eluded-to Kahler-based eigenstate.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

About The Phenomenology That Is In The Klein Bottle

Inside the general Ward-Neumman parameters of that phenomenology, that is of the holonomic substrate of any given arbitrary eigenstate of the Klein Bottle -- there is a Higgs Boson eigenstate that works to guide its motion, in such a manner by which it is hooked to the so-eluded-to holonomic substrate of such a so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate -- that is situated at the center of the immediate exterior to the relative norm-to-forward-holomorphic positioning (at the relative "top") of the said respective Klein Bottle eigenstate.  The rest of the room that is occupied by the Ward-Neumman bounds of such a so-stated "bottle-like" eigenstate of phenomenology, is filled with norm-state projections, that are put into such a boundary-like state, to where there is just enough ample room -- for it to work to include a relatively multivarious scalar magnitude of Hodge-based index, of what would enter here as fully uncompactified discrete quanta of energy.  The Laplacian-based spread of those first-ordered point particles that work to comprise the general Ward-Neumman bounds of the said holonomic substrate of such a said Klein Bottle eigenstate, tend to be both as homeomorphically and as homeogeneously spread as feasible.  As discrete energy enters the said Ward-Neumman bounds of such a so-eluded-to eigenstate -- any scalar amplitude that had effected the length of those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, will be temporarily abated -- as the so-stated superstrings go into the Gliosis-based physical bounds of the said "bottle."  At this point, the bottle is to shake, in such a manner -- in so as to work to help those fractals of discrete energy quanta to be re-attained upon that Gliosis-based topology of the entering discrete quanta of energy, in so as to work to help in the process of tending to help, in the activity of keeping discrete energy both persistent and existent.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continue!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Eleventh Test Solution To The Last Test Of Course 19

11)  The Klein Bottle goes through the process of the Kahler-Metric, subsequent to a prominent proximal localized state of affairs -- that may be called an antiholomorphic Kahler Condition.  Once there is any respective given arbitrary relatively local antiholomorphic Kahler Condition, that is to happen here from within a given specific region in the substringular -- the local correlative Wick Action eigenstate is to then work to initiate that motion of a correlative Landau-Gisner Action eigenstate, in so as to work to form the leverage of the Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism, -- in so as to move the local holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle eigenstate , via the correlative Higgs Action eigenstate, into such a Yukawa-based field of those relatively local discrete quanta of energy, that are in need of undergoing what may be termed of here as the Kahler-Metric.  The said holonomic substrate of the Klein Bottle eigenstate, is to then be brought initially into the relative norm-to-forward-holomorphic direction -- until it is to reach the earlier mentioned relative Real Reimmanian Plane -- by which it may be brought into the ensuing Gliosis-based contact with discrete energy quanta, that are in need of re-attaining their necessary fractals of discrete energy quanta.  (This is, as well, in so as to help to cause those needed Gaussian Transformations to happen -- in so as to help at working to free-up space, so that the here relative given arbitrary respective local substringular region may be able to ensue those multiplicit Ward-Caucy-based conditions -- that are needed, in order for that unique region to not be clogged-up, at any viable locus in proximal space.)   Once that the just eluded-to activity of the said Kahler-Metric is to happen, in such a manner in so as to inter-relate with discrete energy -- so that the so-eluded-to discrete quanta of energy are to re-attain their fractals of such discrete energy -- the so-stated Klein Bottle eigenstate is to then be brought into what is here to be the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction, in such a manner in so as to work to produce a Fourier-based tense of a Ward-Caucy-based symmetry.  Since all of the superstrings that work to belong to any one orbifold eigenset, will tend to be of the same universal setting -- during the actual Kahler-Metric itself -- all of the superstrings that are to interact with the said holonomic substrate of one respective Klein Bottle eigenstate, will tend to be of the same universal setting.  Yet, immediately after the so-eluded-to Kahler-Metric -- the corelatve Klein Bottle eigenstate is to adjust by a pulsation, that is to work to involve three consecutive iterations of group-related instanton -- after which, the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate is to work upon another substringular tense that is to undergo the Kahler-Metric.  Depending upon the summed differential geometric activity of the so-stated re-adjustment -- the ensuing activity of such a so-stated holonomic substrate of the initially stated Klein Bottle eigenstate, may or may not then act upon either a different universal setting that is to then need to undergo the Kahler-Metric, or, it may or may not then act upon a different region of the same universal setting that is to then need to undergo the Kahler-Metric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The 10th Test Solution To The Last Test Of Course 19

10)  Generally, when one is to refer to superstrings, one is to here be referring to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  Permittivity has more to do with the magnetic field than the electric field.  This would then mean, that superstrings are directly associated with the pointal characteristics of the fractal modulae of phenomenology -- whereas, the immediate counterparts of superstrings, or, in other words, the correlative counterstrings -- are directly associated with the wave-based characteristics of the fractal modulae of phenomenology.  One prime example of this, on a reverse-"fractal"-based manner -- is iron.  Iron is highly magnetic, and, iron tends to have a higher fractal modulus than an elastic modulus.  Whereas, generally, when one is to refer to the Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates, one is to here be referring to discrete quanta of energy impedance.  Impedance has more to do with the electric field than the magnetic field.  This would then mean that Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are directly associated with the pointal characteristics of the elastic modulae of phenomenology -- whereas, the immediate light-cone-gauge eigenstates that work to inter-bind the said Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates with the correlative superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are directly associated with the wave-based characteristics of the elastic modulae of phenomenology.  One prime example of this, on a reverse-"fractal"-based manner -- is water. Water has a high ability to transfer charge, and, water has a higher elastic modulus than a fractal modulus.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

A Little Bit More As To Phenotypical And Recessive Bonding Cites

When one set of one or more sub-atomic particles acts as the source of a phenotypical bonding cite, while a second set of one or more sub-atomic particles acts as the source of a recessive bonding cite -- the said set of sub-atomic particles that works to act as having the phenotypical bonding cite, acts as a "catylist," while, the said set of sub-atomic particles that works to act as having the recessive bonding cite acts as a substrate, -- by which the bonding cite that is to exist here, in so as to work to help to allow for the bonding that is to exist here between the two so-stated sets of sub-atomic particles, is to be Gliosis at the Poincare level -- at the set of those sub-atomic particles that act as having here a phenotypical bonding cite.  When the bonding cite, that is to exist at a locus that is positioned on the proximal locus of one set of one or more sub-atomic particles, is phenotypical -- this will tend to mean that there will here be a certain given arbitrary respective Hodge-Index of mini-stringular segmentation, that is effectual at the respective bonding cite, that is either of a cylindrical and/or of a shaft-like nature -- in so as to act as an eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.  Whereas, when the bonding cite, that is to exist at a locus that is positioned on the proximal locus of one set of one or more sub-atomic particles, is recessive -- this will tend to mean that there will be a certain given arbitrary respective Hodge-Index of mini-stringular segmentation that is effectual at the respective bonding cite, that is either of an oriface and/or of an annulus-based nature -- in so as to act as an eigenstate of what may here be thought of as a complentary homotopic nature in a directly covariant manner, towards the specific local correlative eigenstate of the centralized knotting of the Rarita Structure.  Often, one given arbitrary sub-atomic particle may have both of the just mentioned general types of bonding potentials immediately attatched to the holonomic substrate of its Gliosis-based topology, yet, the manner by which these so-eluded-to particles come together with other particles, will work to effect whether or not this will act as a particle that will act as having either a phenotypical or as a  recessive  bonding cite.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The 9th Test Solution To The Last Test Of Course 19

9)  A given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is to inter-connect to its directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov Trace eigenstate -- at the relative reverse-holomorphic side of the so-stated superstirng of discrete energy permittivity -- via the mini-stringular segmentation, that may be described of here as a correlative first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  The so-eluded-to respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate, is the metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator of the pointal-based discrete quantum of energy impedance -- just as the said superstring of discrete energy permittivity is here to be the metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator of the pointal-based discrete quantum of energy permittivity.  A one-dimensional superstring of such, is interconnected to the correlative respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate -- by five second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates, while a two-dimensional superstring of such, is interconnected to the correlative respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate -- by ten second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates.  During any respective given arbitrary iteration of BRST -- the directly associated second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates, are "plucked" like a harp during the directly associated Clifford Expansion in which proximal localized mini-stringular segmentation is to here be fed into the core-field-density of the correlative light-cone-gauge eigenstate, in so as to work to form Fourier-based vibrations that may be termed of as Schwinger-Indices.  The so-stated Schwinger-Indices, are to then be propagated along what may be termed of here as the Rarita Structure -- in so as to act as gravity waves -- that work to interact indirectly with both gravitons and gravitinos, in order to form a relatively immediate inter-relationship between both discrete energy permittivity and discrete energy impedance, with the actual more innately gravity-based particles.  Such an inter-relationship is enacted, in so as to work to keep discrete energy quanta from flying apart -- in order to tend to work to allow, in general, for those discrete inter-relations of energy phenomena to be enacted upon each other over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

More As To Both Phenotypical And Recessive Bonding Cites

When a sub-atomic particle is to bear what would here amount to of as having a recessive bonding cite, during which directly associated group-metric -- the other one or more sub-atomic particles that are to bond to the initially so-stated sub-atomic particle, are to bear what would here amount to of as having a phenotypical bonding cite -- then, that holonomic substrate as to the "fitting" of the bonding cite that is recessive, will not tend to bear an adequate Hodge-Index of that mini-stringular segmentation that is immediately Yukawa to the Fourier-based activity of the bonding by which the two so-eluded-to sets of sub-atomic particles are to bond -- via that Gliosis-based inter-relation, in which what is here to be the phenotypical bonding cite, is to, instead, work to bear that adequate scalar magnitude of a Hodge-Index of that mini-stringular segmentation that is immediately Yukawa to the Fourier-based activity of the said bonding of the two so-stated sets of sub-atomic particles, that are here to work to form a less fractaled composition, as to this tending to be of a higher order of the  building blocks of the construction of a given arbitrary respective atom.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To Phenotypical And Recessive Bonding Cites

  Think of the general condition of both phenotypical and recessive genes, at the level of the nuclei of living cells.  Now, think of such a general condition -- as a fractal that is to here be taken at the sub-atomic level.  Whenever a quark works to bond to another sub-atomic particle -- the bonding cite is always on the quark -- at the gluon of the respective quark.  So, whenever a quark is to bond to another sub-atomic particle -- the bonding cite of the quark, which is at the gluon of the said quark -- is of a phenotypical nature.  So, whenever one or more leptons are to bond to one or more quarks -- the bonding cite that is of such a said set of letpons, is always to tend to be of a recessive nature.  Yet, when two or more leptons bond to one another -- the bonding cites of the said two or more leptons, instead of being of a recessive nature, are to here be of a phenotypical nature. That's all for now!
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.