3) Let us consider one respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, initially, that is of one respective universal setting -- over a directly corresponding Fourier-Transformation, in which such a set of superstrings that operate in so as to perform one specific function, are Yukawa to a relative proximal localized cite -- that is of one substringular region, in which such a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator is to work to bear here, a topological flow that is Gliosis to the Ward-Caucy bounds of one specific universal tense of a Gaussian-based spacing. All of those discrete quanta of energy, that work here to comprise the so-stated orbifold eigenset, are both codeterminable, covariant, and codifferenitiable to the same Gaussian-based tense of a Jacobian-related eigenbase -- to where all of the "packets" of discrete energy that work to make-up such an orbifold eigenset, are of the same universal setting, or, in other words, to where all of the "packets" of discrete energy that work to make-up such an orbifold eigenset, are all of the same universe. Next, let us say that there is to here be another relatively adjacent orbifold eigenset, that acts in a Fourier-based manner -- in so as to have component parts that wobble in such a manner -- in so as to not bear here a Yukawa-based Ward-Caucy-related topological sway, that would otherwise be viable in an abelian manner -- upon the eigenstates of the discrete energy quanta, that have worked here to comprise the initially said orbifold eigenset, that is of this respective case. Since the two mentioned orbifold eigensets of such a given case, bear such a Li-based Jacobian eigenbase -- that is heuristically non-viable -- the one tense of the given eigenbase -- when in relation to the first said oribifold eigenset, upon the other tense of the given eigenbase -- when taken in relation to the second said orbifold eigenset, when this is taken in terms of the lack of an abelian topolological sway of the correlative eigenstates of the Rarita Structure of the first mentioned so-eluded-to orbifold eigenset, upon the other respective mentioned so-eluded-to orbifold eigenset, then, the Li-based Gaussian spacing of the two individually taken orbifold eigensets, are not of such a nature, in so as to have a direct spontaneous interdependent homotopic interaction of one of such eigensets upon the other. This would thus work to cause the two said respective orbifold eigensets, to be of two different universal setting.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment