Let us go back to the case in point that I had left off at during my last post. What we have here is a collective set of orbifold eigensets that are both covariant, codifferentiable, and codeterminable -- in a condition-based state of Noether Flow -- in which both the respective individual said orbifold eigensets, as well as the resultant of the interaction of such so-stated orbifold eigensets, are all moving under the means of a Noether-based flow, over a sequential series of group-related instantons. This would here mean that the initial condition of the kinematic-based differential flow of the initial interaction of the said set of orbifold eigensets, of this particular case in point, is not of a tachyonic-based nature. After a respective given arbitrary relatively transient group metric of iterative instantons, the initial Noether-based flow of the interactive set of orbifold eigensets of this case are perturbated -- into an ensuing tense of what is here to become a tachyonic-based flow of cohomological-based indices, when given the physical memory of the mappable tracing, as to both the plotting of both the existence and the activity of those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that have here undergone the performance of a set of unique interactive operations -- that have here acted in so as to do a specific set of functions in the substringular. The respective given arbitrary interaction of a covariant codifferentiable, and codeterminable set of orbifold eigensets, that work to perform one set of operational-based functions -- may either maintain a static-based substringular state of kinematic-based activities, work to perform a state of conformal invariance ( of which may be either of a superconformal-based or of a conformal-based nature), or, the so-eluded-to operational-based pretense of the genus of such a substringlular set of interactive functions may work to perform a divergent pretense of kinematic-based activity in the substringular.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Sam Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment