Sub-Light-Cone-Gauge-Topology

When one considers the topology of either a superstring at the Gliossi-based Ward-Neumman-bounds of its directly corresponding core-field-density at the Poincaire level, the correlative counterpart of the so-stated superstring at the Gliossi-based Ward-Neumman-bounds of its directly corresponding core-field-density at the Poincaire level, or the correlative Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate at the Gliossi-based Ward-Neumman-bounds of its directly corresponding core-field-density at the Poincaire level, the mini-string segments that work to form the eluded-to topological formats bear different abelian-based tendencies that work to form the physical nature of the corresponding genus of the counterpart of the so-stated discrete energy permittivity, as with the corresponding discrete energy impedance, respectively.  A superstring of discrete energy permittivity bears a relatively abelian composition of the integration of the partition-based segments at the timeless moment of its iteration of the bascially stand-still Hamiltonian-mode that it imparts, over the course of such a succeeding display of group instanton that it acts as being of one discrete partial of -- over the sequential series of such iterations, of which works to form the mobility of discrete energy "thrust" over time.  This is at a level that is more succinct than the light-cone-gauge-based-level -- since this is at the Ward-Neumman-based mappable tracing of its topology, at the corresponding Gliossi-based core-field-density that it works to designate as at the Poincaire level, as I have already mentioned.  This here relative abelian nature is a consideration of its comparative kinematic-based differential geometry, that is more of an integration of supplemental-based partials. Through the relatively non-abelian-based nature of its directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate -- that works to form that discrete energy impedance that would here interact with the eluded-to discrete energy permittivity, that is of the so-stated general condition of its correlative superstring.  Again, this is at the Gliossi-based topology that is at the Poincaire level of the respective superstring -- when this is related to the Gliossi-based topology that is taken at the Poincaire level of the respective Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate.  As eluded-to before, this is due to the less supplemental-based and timeless based delineation of the mini-string segments that work to comprise the said given arbitrary Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate.  Counterstrings bear a relatively abelian-based topology at the Gliossi-based core-field-density of their respective topological-based eigenstate, as taken at the Poincaire level -- such as is the differential oscillation-based nature of their correlative directly associated superstrings.