Friday, September 21, 2012

About Multi-Torsioned Ghosts

When a ghost anomalic region -- when either consisting of the physical memory of where a given arbitrary superstring has recently moved over a sequential series of instantons, or consisting of the phsyical memory of where a given cohomology of two or more superstrings that act together has recently moved over a sequential series of instantons -- bears one singularity from hermicity due to a torque in its overall Hodge-Field-Index, then, there would be a tendancy for one semi-group that would here consist of one set of negative-norm-states to have the ability to work to scatter the earlier mentioned ghost anomalic region in order to provide for the production of potential dilatons and dilatinos that may subsequently work to form those gravitational particles that are essential for the ability of Ricci Scalar metrics to work through the Rarita Structure so that gravity may occur.  Yet, if another theoretical ghost anomalic region, that consists of the physical mapping of the field trajectories of one or more superstrings over a sequential series of instantons, bears two or more singularities outside of the condition of a hermitian-based mapped out physical memtory in accord to the associated overall of path in terms of the associated Hodge-Field-Index -- that work to cause the said world-sheet-substrate -- whose mapping forms the mentioned ghost-like-region -- then, for every additional singularity that I described as may be occuring over the Laplacian mapping of  the mentioned types of ghost anomalies, there would be the necessity for an additional semi-group of negative-norm-states in order to scatter the said general type of ghost anomalic region. This is in order that: both room may be made for the existence and the motion of other substringular phenomena in the general region of the Ultimon, as well as in order that gravitational particles may continue to form and reform so that the Ricci Scalar may continue to occur via the Rarita Structure.
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: