Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Partitions

What I mean by a partition is NOT the eigenstates of metric-gauge that comprise superstrings, and partitions also do not include the swivel-shape-tendencies of superstrings that are end-to-end yet do not form a completely colinear  or radial segment from the "bottom" (for one-dimensional superstrings) or toward  the relative zero degree part (for 2-d superstrings) part of one given first-ordered point particle toward the relative top (for 1-d strings) or the relative 360 degree mark (for 2-d strings) of the ensuing first-ordered point particle that comprises any given arbitrary superstring that acts as discrete energy permittivity as this phenomena exists when one maps in a Laplacian manner the directoralization of the first-ordered point particles from the relative reverse-norm-to-holomorphic to the relative forward-norm-to-holomorphic direction of where a given superstring exists during its tightly-knit "Fourier"-sub-metric vibration that happens during instanton.  What I mean by a partition is a condition in which a given first-ordered point particle that is in the relative or forward or reverse-norm-to-holomorphic Laplacian mapping of a given superstring is completely to the side of the topological flow of the given superstring while yet directly adjacent to the same topological flow of the said superstring -- touching with an unborne tangency (or, in other words, the touch is not Gliossi) -- with a separation that is the thickness and/or width a first-ordered point particle.  The separation itself is either in the holomorphic, reverse-holomorphic, forward-norm-to-holomorphic, and/or in the reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction of the said superstring.  The direction of the Laplacian flow of the topology of the said superstring where the said partition is at is either in the forward-norm-to-holomorphic, reverse-norm-to-holomorphic, and-or in the holomorphic or in the reverse holomorphic direction of a given superstring when taken respectively.  If the locus of where along the topology of the Laplacian mapping of a one-dimensional superstring is is in the norm-to-holomorphic direction of that mapping of a given superstring, then the separation that I here have called a partition is either in the holomorphic or in the reverse-holomorphic direction of the substringular momentum of the said one-dimensional superstring.  If the locus of where along the topology of the Laplacian mapping of a two-dimensional superstring is  is as what I just mentioned about one-dimensional strings, then the partitions are as before Except that these partitions will be mapped out radially along the topology of a given bosonic string And the said partitions will also simultaneously be mapped out also in the norm-to-holomorphic, reverse-norm-to-holomorphic, holomorphic, and or/in the reverse holomorphic direction of the Laplacian flow of the topology of the said bosonic string.  If the Laplacian flow just implied is radially in the holomorphic direction of the said bosonic string, then the direction of the corresponding separation is both in the holomorphic and in the norm-to-holomorphic direction of the described bosonic string.  Yet, if the Laplacin flow just implied is radially in the reverse-holomorphic direction of the said bosonic string, then the direction of the corresponding separation is both in the reverse-holomorphic and in the reverse-norm-to-holomorphic direction of the substringular momentum of the said bosonic superstring.  Next, I will explain the condition as to that the Minimum number of partitions in a one-dimensional superstring is one and the Minimum number of partitions in a two-dimensional superstring is two.  Generally, there are a lot more partitions in these.  I don't want to lose the reader, so I will continue with the suspence later!  
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.           

No comments: