Part One of the Ninth Session of Course 9 on Fock Space and the Light-Cone-Gauge

There are many times as many two-dimensional superstrings as one-dimensional superstrings.  Another way to put it, there are many times as many closed or bosonic superstrings as there are open or fermionic superstrings.  So, for instance, when an electron forms a photon by dropping an energy level, a phenomena that contains one-dimensional superstrings in terms of its plain kinetic energy -- this phenomena with plain kinetic energy being an electron -- drops an energy level so as to emit a particle that is comprised, in part, of a two-dimensional superstring that here is a photon.  A photon is an arbitrary example of a phenonema whose discrete energy permittivity is comprised of a bosonic, or closed, or another words, of a two-dimensional superstring.  Nuclei of atoms do not bear much plain kinetic energy as compared to that of electrons.  For that reason, the nuclei of atoms have a higher percentage of two-dimensional superstrings than the percentage of two-dimensional superstrings that an electron has.  Superstrings may open and superstrings may shut.  A one-dimensional superstring shuts to form a two-dimensional superstring, as an arbitrary example, when the plain kinetic energy that comprises an elecatron forms the substringular  portion of a photon.  A two-dimensional superstring of a photon opens to form a one-dimensional superstring that comprises a discrete unit of kinetic energy permittivity when a discrete unit of electromagnetic energy converts to a discrete unit of kinetic energy.  Zero-Norm-States (loose point particles) are what open or shut superstrings.  When a point particle that forms a line of tangency by being norm to a disc-like configuration of point particles that interconnect directly via a mini-string segment, this is an example of a negative-norm-state when these states travel in the reverse-holomorphic  general direction during Ultimon Flow.  If I previously accidentally flipped the concept of the relative holomorphicity before as to this, this right here is the way it is.  Here is how I can see better as to what I am talking about now:  The scattering of the collision of negative-norm-states with substringular phenomena leaves a ghost-like and virtually motionless pattern of where the prior mentioned substringular phenomena had been in an arbitrary prior iteration.  I will continue with the suspense later.  Until then, aim your spear for the moon so that you can get your spear across the river.
The just mentioned comment is a metaphor for trying to continually improve in life.
Have a phenomenal day!                          
Sincerely,                          
Sam Roach.                                              

Some Help As To The Nature Of Scattered Light

When a photon initially strikes a phenomena, it goes from very briefly tachyonic to light-speed to under light speed in such a fashion so that the said photon may be homologous with the orbifold eigenset that it belongs to in the ensuing instantons when it has finished scattering and has been quantized into the beam of electromagnetic energy that it is to be absorbed into.   This happens in such a fashion so as to obey Snell's Law.  --  A beam of electromagnetic energy is propagated slower in any normally conceived medium than it is propagated through a vacuum.  The reason as to why EM energy initially becomes tachyonic when it first strikes another phenomenon is that the light-cone-gauge of the arbitrary EM energy will here initially alter from Yang-Mills to Kaluza-Klein analogous to the function of a shock-absorber, while the environment of the said photons converts its light-cone-gauge topology back into a Yang-Mills topology due to the equal and opposite response to the lack of resistence that the mentioned photon is then going through.  The photons consequently slow to the speed of light while yet slowing to under the speed of light in such a fashion so as to requanize with the orbifold eigensets that are excepting of the spin-orbital momentum, angular momentum, and the various Ward Caucy and Njenhuis characteristics of momentum that are associated with the ability of photons to be absorbed into a beam of light in a quantized manner.  This overall process goes as is according to Snell's Law.
If a photon that scattered never changed temporarily in terms of its light-cone-gauge, then the above wouldn't happen.
If the above didn't happen, then photons would not be able to succesfully be absorbed into beams of light that were homologous enough to allow for the proper requantization.  If that were to happen, light would chaotically scatter in a manner so that heat would not be able to organize to allow for the perpetual existence of mass.
Yet, because of the nature of the Yang-Mills nature of EM-related superstrings, when light scatters, it initially becomes tachyonic due to the initial change into a Kaluza-Klein topology due to the basic nature of the corallary of how springs work.  This is an unchangeable fact just like 1+1 will always be 2.  As photons that have just scatterd are releaved of stress, these will naturally go back to having a Yang-Mills topology due to the fact that physical nature works to obey the laws of inertia.  This activity of the release from the physical stress of scattering causes the described photons to slow down to under the speed of light.  Due to the fact that photons that have arbitrarily just been scattered need to be quantized with orbifold eigensets that are compatible with them, the process of light propagation through something besides a vacuum obeys Snell's Law.  By light, I do not just mean visible light.  --  I mean electromagnetic energy of any sort except that of Kirchoff Radiation.  This is not a eutopia as to how light scattering works, yet, this gives you the general idea.                     
Siincerely,
Sam.                                                      

A Little About Orientable And Non-Orientable Superstrings

When a superstring is about to be tachyonic, it has more of a swivel shape than it would normally have otherwise. What I mean by a swivel shape is that the torsion due to the Gliossi norm states that act upon the given superstring produce a tensoric torsion upon the structure that is formed by the tying of first-ordered-point-particles that comprise the said one or two-dimensional superstring. Such a multiplicit dimensional torsion transpires over a Fourier Metric, yet the non-orientable nature that is produced by certain swivel shaped superstrings is cheifly displayed by the gauge-metrics that occur during the Bette and Polyokov Actions, which is a relatively Laplacian condition. When a superstring is acted upon with a multiplicit dimensional torsion that bears an assymetry in the Ward Caucy bounds of the Laplacian structure of the given superstring during the Bette Action which is during instanton, then the Grassman Constant is not respectively unitary. A non-unitized field between a superstring and its counterpart that remains as such during the Regge Action will cause the associated superstring to spring the basis of its light-cone-gauge-eigenstate in such a manner that the said string will not be able to differentiate according to Noether Flow in-between two consecutive instantons. This makes the given superstring tachyonic. Reverse-Holomorphic Gliossi norm states always eventually form an equal and opposite untorsioning of the Njenhuis bending of interconnected first-ordered-point-particle states in order to form a unitary vibration that is to exist along the topology of the said vibrating hoop or along the topology of the said vibrating strand. Such Njenhuis torsion is caused by the interaction of dark matter upon light matter. Such an interaction produces the said Gliossi interaction that I initially described in this discussion, due to the Ward Polorazation effect that transpires in an interaction of multidimensional dark matter residue that assymetrically pulls upon the topology of a superstring. Such a pull may even happen when the transient ghost anomalies formed by dark matter assymetrically tug Njenhuisly upon a superstring. Please comment whether or not you understand, so that I may learn how to communicate better.