Orbifold Re-Bounding And The i*PI(del) Action

Let us initially consider an orbifold eigenset -- that is of a mass-bearing tense of discrete energy permittivity, that is here to be transferred back-and-forth, -- along a congruent Stoke's-based path, in so as to accelerate in one general direction, from an initial "stand-still", to then reaching its peak of its acceleration at one-fourth of the way along its general path, to then slowing down to a stand-still at one-half of the way along its general Stoke's-based path, to then accelerating up to its peak rate of transfer at three-fourths of its way along its general path, to then slowing down to a relative standstill, at the end of its here to be relatively antiholomorphic positioning.  As this orbifold eigenset is to be accelerating, in so as to then to be losing its correlative partition-based discrepancies at a relatively increased rate -- to then thereby later, to be accelerating in the opposite general direction, -- such a kinematic perturbation that is here to be happening, is here to be increasing in its rate.  As the orbifold eigenset is here to be decelerated in its rate of transfer, it will then work here to involve a decrease in the rate of its correlative i*PI(del) action. Let's try to consider here, that the end-points eluded-to, are here to work to form a pattern of the delineation of the overall gauge-metric, that is here of the inferred transfer of the said orbifold eigenset,  to where such a said eigenset is to go in a back-and-forth manner -- along the earlier mentioned Stoke's-based path, over time.  Each time that the said orbifold eigenset is to act in so as to reverse in its relative holomorphic direction, such a so-inferred antiholomorphic set of conditions may then work to delineated a Wick Action eigenstate, that is then to spontaneously enact an ensuing pattern, in which the orbifold eigenset of such a given arbitrary case is then to be about to be made as Gliosis to the Kaher-Metric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.