Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Cohomological Generation And Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode

Mass-Bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are Yau-Exact.  Superstrings that are capable of generating as much cohomology as these are to degenerate over time -- are said to be of a Yau-Exact nature.  Mass-Bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, have the general tendency of being superconformally invariant at an internal-reference-frame, and are thus said to bear, what I term of as being of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode.  An orbifold eigenset is a set of discrete quanta of energy, that operate in so as to perform one specific function.  An orbifold eigenset is said to work to bear a De Rham cohomology -- when it is to work to bear no metric nor Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularities.  Consequently, an orbifold eigenset is said to work to bear a De Rham cohomology -- when it is to work to bear both hermitian metric and hermitian Lagrangian-based singularities.  When an orbifold eigenset, that is here to consist of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, is to bear a De Rham cohomology, -- then it is then to be working to exemplify its capacity of exhibiting a tendency of being of a Yau-Exact nature.  The greater that the scalar amplitude is, of the correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, of any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- the more tightly that there is here to be a consequent relatively even trade-off of the directly corresponding generation and degeneration of both cohomological eigenstates and cohomological eigenindices, over a demonstrable evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  The more of a relatively even trade-off that there is here to be, of the directly corresponding generation and degeneration of both cohomological eigenstates and cohomological eigenindices, that there is here to be, for any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- over a demonstrable evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- the less often that the vibrational oscillations of the directly corresponding superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work to comprise such a said orbifold eigenset, will tend to need to re-adjust -- without the potential of slippage, in so to persist at working to bear a relatively orthogonal wave-tug at the Poincare level,  upon those physically-based norm-state-projections that these are to come into a Gliosis-related contact with, in the process of working to bear a homology-related geometry, that is of an abelian nature.  The reason as to why bosonic superstrings work to bear less of a tendency of that "slippage," that would otherwise work to allow for less of an orthogonal wave-tug impartation at the Poincare level (as is with superstrings that are, instead, to be of a Legendre homology), is in part, because bosonic strings are closed-loops of topological stratum, that are comprised of by "beads" of first-ordered point particles that are inter-laced by mini-stringular segmentation, while the said physically-based norm-state-projections that I have here mentioned -- are relatively small sets of first-ordered point particles, that are bound by chords of one or more strands of mini-stringular segmentation.  Ward-Cauchy-related discrete quanta-based phenomenology, is delineated by one Planck-Length and/or one Planck-Radii -- per iteration of BRST -- while such discrete quanta of energy, are to be constantly vibrating in the process (not to mention the then present activity of both the Polyakov Action and the Beti Action).  This is while the norm-state-projections mentioned, are to constantly to be moving from within their correlative individually taken sets of parallel universes.  Consequently -- as norm-state-projections are to come into a Gliosis-related contact with a bosonic string -- then, such a general genus of interaction -- will tend to be driven in the "direction" of altering its position, along the topology of the so-eluded-to closed string, until it is to come into a spot, -- where there is to be the exhibition of a relatively orthogonal wave-tug interaction, that is here to be at the Poincare level of the so-eluded-to Yukawa-related coupling.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: