Conductance And Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode

When one is to have a given arbitrary set of physical phenomenology -- that is to bear composite individually taken orbifold eigensets, that are here to work to bear a relatively high tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode,  -- then, such said individually taken orbifold eigensets, that are here to make up the said given arbitrary set of physical phenomenology, are here to come together in a way, that is to tend to work to bear a relatively high tense of both conductance and compacitence.  Consequently, -- when one is to have a given arbitrary set of physical phenomenology -- that is to bear composite individually taken orbifold eigensets, that are here to work to bear a relatively low tense of a  Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, -- then such said individually taken orbifold eigensets, that are here to make the said given arbitrary set of physical phenomenology, are here to come together in a way, that is to here to tend to work to bear a relatively low tense of both conductance and compacitence. 
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Orbifold Re-Bounding And The i*PI(del) Action

Let us initially consider an orbifold eigenset -- that is of a mass-bearing tense of discrete energy permittivity, that is here to be transferred back-and-forth, -- along a congruent Stoke's-based path, in so as to accelerate in one general direction, from an initial "stand-still", to then reaching its peak of its acceleration at one-fourth of the way along its general path, to then slowing down to a stand-still at one-half of the way along its general Stoke's-based path, to then accelerating up to its peak rate of transfer at three-fourths of its way along its general path, to then slowing down to a relative standstill, at the end of its here to be relatively antiholomorphic positioning.  As this orbifold eigenset is to be accelerating, in so as to then to be losing its correlative partition-based discrepancies at a relatively increased rate -- to then thereby later, to be accelerating in the opposite general direction, -- such a kinematic perturbation that is here to be happening, is here to be increasing in its rate.  As the orbifold eigenset is here to be decelerated in its rate of transfer, it will then work here to involve a decrease in the rate of its correlative i*PI(del) action. Let's try to consider here, that the end-points eluded-to, are here to work to form a pattern of the delineation of the overall gauge-metric, that is here of the inferred transfer of the said orbifold eigenset,  to where such a said eigenset is to go in a back-and-forth manner -- along the earlier mentioned Stoke's-based path, over time.  Each time that the said orbifold eigenset is to act in so as to reverse in its relative holomorphic direction, such a so-inferred antiholomorphic set of conditions may then work to delineated a Wick Action eigenstate, that is then to spontaneously enact an ensuing pattern, in which the orbifold eigenset of such a given arbitrary case is then to be about to be made as Gliosis to the Kaher-Metric.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wave-Tug Upon Mass-Bearing Superstrings

Superstrings that are of kinetic-energy-related phenomenology -- tend to be open-looped superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, to where such said strings will, as well when individually taken, tend to be of an isotropically stable nature.  The more of a homogeneous wave-tug, that is here to be applied By a set of Legendre-based superstrings Towards a given arbitrary set of orbifold eigensets of mass-bearing superstrings, over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eignemetric -- the faster that the velocity of the so-eluded-to mass-bearing strings, will then tend to be transferred, in that relatively holomorphic direction -- that is here to conform to both the manner and the application of the earlier mentioned homogeneous wave-tug.
Such an increase in relative velocity -- by the increased wave-tug of a set of Legendre-based strings upon a set of closed-stringular phenomenology, will then, in turn, tend to work to increase the scalar amplitude of the here correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction over time.  Such an increase in Lorentz-Four-Contraction will, in turn, work to increase the correlative rate of the i*PI(del) Action, -- over the proscribed so-eluded-to evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  The faster that the Lorentz-Four-Contraction is to be increased -- the quicker that the correlative i*PI(del) Action will result in accelerating. 
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

i*PI(del) Action and Majorana-Wayl-Invariant-Mode

The greater that the scalar amplitude of the correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode is to be, for a given arbitrary orbifold eigenset (over time), at a relatively internal reference-frame -- the less likely that there will tend to be an attribute of a Lorentz-Four-Contraction, upon the earlier mentioned said orbifold eigenset.  The less that there is an attributed Lorentz-Four-Contraction, to be enacted upon any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset over time, -- the less that there will be a tendency of the said orbifold eigenset, to then be going through the process of gaining and/or loosing a scalar amount of what I term of as being "partition-based discrepancies.)  The less that there is here to be neither a gain and/or a loss of partition-based discrepancies over time, -- the less that there will consequently be, the kinematic activity of what is here to be a proximal local tense of what I term of as being the i*PI(del) Action.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Rate Of i*PI(del) Action

The quicker that a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset is to approach light speed, the quicker that such a said eigenset is to attain a respectively greater Lorentz-Four-Contraction -- over the so-eluded-to duration of terrestrial time.  The quicker that the respective Lorentz-Four-Contraction is to increase, for any one said given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- the quicker that the directly corresponding partition-based discrepancies, that are correlative to the so-eluded-to individually taken superstrings that work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset, will decrease in their correlative scalar quantity.  This will then work to result, in a relatively increased rate in the directly corresponding i*PI(del) action -- that is here to be proximal local to the relatively internal reference-frame of the said orbifold eigenset.  Consequently, a rapid change in the Lorentz-Four-Contraction of this given arbitrary case (the corrilary of this is apparent, too -- and this thus works in the reversal of such a soon mentioned tendency), will then result in a rapid loss of those partition-based discrepancies -- that work to form the correlative tense of the homotopic residue, that may be attributed to the topological-related holonomic substrate, of those superstrings that work to comprise their directly corresponding orbifold eigenset.  Yet, as stated in similar words before, -- when an orbifold eigenset is to increase in the rate of its velocity, -- the decrease in the number of partition-based discrepancies, that are of those individually taken superstrings that work to comprise one said orbifold eigenset -- is accompanied by a proportional increase in the number of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work here to comprise the said orbifold eigneset, -- thereby, this general tense of activity may then work at helping to tend to work to allow for a conservation of the proximal local state of homotopic residue.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Why The i*PI(del) Action Is Named As Such

Let us -- in this given arbitrary case scenario -- consider the forward-holomocphic direction of one respective given arbitrary un-scattered photon,  to be going in such a direction, in so as to be moving relatively forward "into the page."  In such a given situation, the placement of its one attributed partition-based discrepancy, will be delineated here -- at a proximal locus, that is here to be at the relative "PI" positioning of the directly corresponding superstring of discrete electromagnetic energy permittivity.
All motion is relative to both the motion and the existence of electromagnetic energy.  This is part of as to why that I am here, to call the activity of the transference of partition-based discrepancies -- as being that term in which I am to call this to be the "i*PI(del) Action."
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely Samuel David Roach.

Spur In Acceleration

Whenever a given arbitrary orbifold eigenset is to change in the rate of its acceleration, over a given arbitrary evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- then, the spread of the activity of its correlative i*PI(del) action-related indices, -- will here have a tendency of not being delineated or applied smoothly in an overall homeomorphic manner, over the course of the here mentioned evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, that is here to be considered in the course of the Fourier-related activity of such a said respective orbifold eigenset, this orbifold eigenset of which is here to be transferred through space and time over the so-eluded-to duration.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach. 

Evenly-Smooth Application Of i*Pi(del) Action

Whenever one is to have a given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- that is here to work to maintain its genus of spatial dimensionality, in which the directly corresponding homotopic residue is to be conserved, over a given evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric -- from the vantage-point of the internal reference-frame of such a said respective orbifold eigenset -- there is then to tend to be an evenly-smooth application of the directly corresponding given arbitrary i*PI(del) Action. This will then tend to mean, -- that the respective given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of such a case, will then tend to maintain the tense of its rate of the acceleration of its pulsation, over the course of the duration of such a respective evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  This will then tend to mean, that the so-eluded-to set of discrete energy quanta, that are here to operate to perform one specific Ward-Cauchy-related function -- will then tend to bear no metrical-related "spurs" in its so-eluded-to acceleration. This will then work to tend to mean -- that, over the so-mentioned Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- that the said eigenset will, over the course of the so-eluded-to duration that is here to be extrapolated, tend to work to bear no spurs in its metric-based Chern-Simons singularities, -- since there is here to be no alteration in the acceleration of its dimensional-related pulsation.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

More As To The i*PI(del) Action

The resultant of the exchange of what I have mentioned in the past as to be partition-based discrepancies, is what I term of as being the phenomenology of homotopic residue.
That action that is then to occur, in so as to work to create any given arbitrary state of homotopic residue -- is what I term of as being the "i*PI(del) Action."
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Certain Genus Of Low Flow Of Homotopic Residue

Let us consider a case scenario -- in which there is here to be a mass-bearing orbifold eigenset, that is to maintain the rate of its "velocity," -- over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  Orbifold eigensets -- that are here to be comprised of by mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that are of a tightly-knit tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, are to work to bear an internal reference-frame, that is here to bear a basically non-existent tense of a correlative Lorentz-Four-Contraction, -- when such a tense of the said Lorentz-Four-Contraction, is here to be relativistic to the "vantage-point" of such a so-stated internal reference-frame.  The less that the Lorentz-Four-Contraction is to be, for any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, the higher that the scalar amplitude of the here correlative Polyakov Action eigenstate, is then to tend to enfold as.  The higher that the scalar amplitude of the correlative Polyakov Action eigenstate is to be, for any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset of such a respective case, the more partition-based-discrepancies that will then tend to be present per individually taken superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- along the Laplacian-based flow of that topological stratum, that is here to be taken -- along the contour of the directly affiliated surface, that is Gliosis to the surface of the said composite individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- when this is taken at the Poincare level to the core-field-density of the here mentioned individually taken superstrings.  This will then tend to mean, that any given arbitrary orbifold eigenset, that is here to work to bear a tightly-knit tense of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, when this is as taken at the internal reference-frame of the said orbifold eigenset -- the less of a tendency that there will then be, of there being the presence of a proximal local Fourier-related exchange, of those said partition-based-discrepancies, that are here to be directly corresponding to the individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are here to work to comprise those mass-bearing strings, that are here to work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset.  This will then work to mean, -- that there will here, in this case scenario, be a lower scalar amplitude of the resultant process of the Ward-Cauchy-based conditions of homotopic residue, for such a said orbifold eigenset, than there would otherwise be existent, for an orbifold eigenset, that is to, instead, be of the nature of either not being superconformally invariant, or of such a condition as to at least not being of such a tightly-knit tense of superconformal invariance -- at an internal reference-frame.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David.

Magnetism And The Right-Hand-Rule

As a beam of electromagnetic energy, is here to be propagating through time and space -- the correlative respective magnetic field, that is of such a case, is here to be wrapped around the correlative respective electric field, as is to be considered as by what is here to be called, -- the "right-hand-rule."
Let us here to be considering such a said propagation of electromagnetic energy -- to be traveling through the medium of a vacuum.  Next, let us consider that such a said beam of electromagnetic energy, is here to be set at one given arbitrary wavelength.  Such a said wavelength, is here to be the scalar distance -- that is here to be directly associated with one compete cycle of the fluctuation of the directly corresponding respective electric field.  Let us next say that the forward motion of the propagation of the correlative electric field, is here to be considered as the relative forward-holomorphic direction.  So, as a beam of such a tense of electromagnetic energy -- that is to here to be propagated by the distance of the so-eluded-to wavelength, that is of the so-eluded-to light-like phenomenology -- then, the directly corresponding magnetic field, that is here to be wrapped around the directly corresponding electric field, is to spiral in a clockwise manner -- around the respective electric field by one complete increment of cycle.  The larger that the wavelength of the light-like phenomenon is to be, the less tightly that the helicity or the spiraling will be, of the Laplacian-related torsion of such a said case -- when this is in consideration of the respective magnetic field to be wrapping around the respective electric field.  Consequently -- the smaller that the wavelength of the light-like phenomenon is to be, the more tightly that the helicity or spiraling will be, of the Laplacian-related torsion of such a case -- when this is in consideration of the respective magnetic field to be wrapping around the respective electric field.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Fluctuation In Electric Field

The wavelength of a beam of any given arbitrary tense of electromagnetic energy, is equal to one complete oscillation of the fluctuation of the directly corresponding respective electric field.
Here's one way of looking at what is here to be meant by "the fluctuation of the directly corresponding electric field."
Let us consider a metaphorical "shaft of brightness," that is here to be at one given arbitrary maximum cross-sectional measure of thickness, for such a so-eluded-to beam.  Let us now say that this said respective shaft, is here to be traveling in a vacuum -- to where it will be propagated, in so as to be traveling as straight as the general innate bending of space and time is to be designated-- along the general course of space and time.  As this said "shaft of brightness" is to be propagated along the general course of space and time -- the so-eluded-to projected beam of brightness, that is here to be linearly delineated, will then tend to go from smoothly decreasing in its cross-sectional thickness, to then going into smoothly re-gaining its initial so-eluded-to cross-sectional thickness, and back again.  In the meanwhile, the center of such a harmonic tense of a fluctuation is to be going as perfectly straight -- as the natural bending of space and time will tend to allow. The scalar distance that is to be considered here, as being taken along the vantage-point, of an extrapolation that is here to be Poincare to the topology-related center of such a so-named shaft of brightness, in which there is here to be the completion of one whole individually taken tense, of the earlier mentioned harmonic perturbation in the cross-sectional thickness of the so-eluded-to beam -- may be here to be analogous to what is meant -- as to what is here to be happening to a beam of electromagnetic energy, as it is here to be harmonically fluctuating in its electric field over time.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Kinetic Energy Associated With Mass-Bearing Superstrings

The higher that the quantum of Legendre-related superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that act in so as to work to form a wave-tug upon a set of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- over an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric -- the more kinetic energy, that is here to then tend to be directly associated with the said mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittiivty, that is of this so-mentioned given arbitrary case.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Wave-Packet

Since a soliton is a phenomenon of the holonomic substrate of a cotangent bundle, that is of a Complex or of a Njenhuis-related manifold -- that is: 1) To work to bear a flat Ricci Curvature.
                                                                     2) To bear no net change in the absolute value of the
                                                                          correlative magnitude of the index of its Beti number.
                                                                      3) To bear a Fourier-related activity -- that is to work to
                                                                           bear the delineation of a holomorphic vector field.;
Then, any given arbitrary example of the holonomic exhibition of a soliton -- is to act as one given arbitrary general genus of a "wave-packet" -- that is to work to bear its kinematic presence, as it is to be acting as a Ward-Cauchy-related Hamiltonian operator, as it is here to be present in the arena of time and space.

I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Some Stuff As To Discrete Energy And Homotopic Residue

Discrete energy -- particularly superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, -- tend to be delineated at the central cite of merging, that exists here between the cohomological convergence and the cohomological divergence of homotopic residue.  Homotopic residue is created by the general interdependent interaction of electromagnetic energy, with other phenomenology of discrete energy.  Partition-Based-Discrepancies exist, due to the Ward-Cauchy-based homotopic conditions, that are of the kinematic vibrations of discrete phenomena, of what works here to involve the general interaction -- that is here to exist between energy permittvity and the presence of the correlative gauge-bosons.  As mass-bearing discrete energy -- when this is here to be taken in terms of the kinematic activity of one distinct given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- works in such a case to approach the velocity of light, -- then, the number of partition-based-discrepancies that are to exist here among the here correlative individually taken superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- that work to comprise the mentioned orbifold eigenset, is thus to decrease, -- while in the meantime, -- the number of such superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work to comprise the so-eluded-to set of discrete quanta of energy, that operate to perform one specific function, is instead to increase.  This works to help, in the process of working to conserve homotopic residue.  This, in tact, works to help to allow for the continued kinematic motion of mass -- as such a mass is to here to be taken, when this is to be taken -- relative to both the motion and the existence of electromagnetic energy.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Cohomological Generation And Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode

Mass-Bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, are Yau-Exact.  Superstrings that are capable of generating as much cohomology as these are to degenerate over time -- are said to be of a Yau-Exact nature.  Mass-Bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, have the general tendency of being superconformally invariant at an internal-reference-frame, and are thus said to bear, what I term of as being of a Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode.  An orbifold eigenset is a set of discrete quanta of energy, that operate in so as to perform one specific function.  An orbifold eigenset is said to work to bear a De Rham cohomology -- when it is to work to bear no metric nor Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons singularities.  Consequently, an orbifold eigenset is said to work to bear a De Rham cohomology -- when it is to work to bear both hermitian metric and hermitian Lagrangian-based singularities.  When an orbifold eigenset, that is here to consist of mass-bearing superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, is to bear a De Rham cohomology, -- then it is then to be working to exemplify its capacity of exhibiting a tendency of being of a Yau-Exact nature.  The greater that the scalar amplitude is, of the correlative Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, of any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- the more tightly that there is here to be a consequent relatively even trade-off of the directly corresponding generation and degeneration of both cohomological eigenstates and cohomological eigenindices, over a demonstrable evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  The more of a relatively even trade-off that there is here to be, of the directly corresponding generation and degeneration of both cohomological eigenstates and cohomological eigenindices, that there is here to be, for any one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- over a demonstrable evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric, -- the less often that the vibrational oscillations of the directly corresponding superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that work to comprise such a said orbifold eigenset, will tend to need to re-adjust -- without the potential of slippage, in so to persist at working to bear a relatively orthogonal wave-tug at the Poincare level,  upon those physically-based norm-state-projections that these are to come into a Gliosis-related contact with, in the process of working to bear a homology-related geometry, that is of an abelian nature.  The reason as to why bosonic superstrings work to bear less of a tendency of that "slippage," that would otherwise work to allow for less of an orthogonal wave-tug impartation at the Poincare level (as is with superstrings that are, instead, to be of a Legendre homology), is in part, because bosonic strings are closed-loops of topological stratum, that are comprised of by "beads" of first-ordered point particles that are inter-laced by mini-stringular segmentation, while the said physically-based norm-state-projections that I have here mentioned -- are relatively small sets of first-ordered point particles, that are bound by chords of one or more strands of mini-stringular segmentation.  Ward-Cauchy-related discrete quanta-based phenomenology, is delineated by one Planck-Length and/or one Planck-Radii -- per iteration of BRST -- while such discrete quanta of energy, are to be constantly vibrating in the process (not to mention the then present activity of both the Polyakov Action and the Beti Action).  This is while the norm-state-projections mentioned, are to constantly to be moving from within their correlative individually taken sets of parallel universes.  Consequently -- as norm-state-projections are to come into a Gliosis-related contact with a bosonic string -- then, such a general genus of interaction -- will tend to be driven in the "direction" of altering its position, along the topology of the so-eluded-to closed string, until it is to come into a spot, -- where there is to be the exhibition of a relatively orthogonal wave-tug interaction, that is here to be at the Poincare level of the so-eluded-to Yukawa-related coupling.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Cohomology And Adjustment Of Manner Of Oscillation

Bosonic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, work to help to form both the presence of both cohomological eigenstates and cohomological eigenindices, over time.  Cohomologies work to involve the integration of grouping abelian states -- that are here to exist as geometrical eigenstates and geometric eigenindices -- that are here to be formed by the interaction of superstsringular phenomenology with physically-based norm-state-projections, -- in so as to work to form geometric entities, that work to make a direct wave-tug imparting with the Ward-Cauchy-related phenomena, that these are to come into a Gliosis-based contact with.  When a bosonic superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is to come into a direct or a Gliosis-related contact with such so-stated norm-state-projections -- there is here to tend to be a relatively orthogonal interaction between the topology of the said superstring, with the holonomic substrate of the said norm-state-projections -- at the Poincare level.  Cohomologies are comprised of by abelian groupings -- because bosonic superstrings, since these are here to be of a closed-looped nature, work to bear relatively less slippage than open-looped or open-stranded strings of discrete energy permittivity happen to do.  Bosonic superstrings adjust their vibrational mode, in so as to work to allow for such a said general genus of a lack of slippage to exist -- in so as to work to allow for the said relatively orthogonal wave-tug-based contact at the Poincare level, with those norm-state-projections that these are to strike, in a Gliosis-related manner -- by altering in the torsioning of their vibrational oscillations, -- in so as to work to allow for such a said direct wave-tug-related contact to persist, in so as to work to help to allow for the continued formation of abelian-related groupings to then to be able to form that general tense of cohomology-related structure, that the kinematic activities of bosonic superstrings are here to work to impart.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Proximal Local Generation Of Cohomology

Let us initially consider a given arbitrary bosonic superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- that is here to be increasing in the scalar amplitude, as to the general amount of cohomology, that it is here to be generating over a set duration of time.  This will then work to mean, that the general amount of cohomology-related eigenstates, that the said discrete quantum of energy permittivity will tend to be producing (to where this so-eluded-to set of cohomology-related eigenstates, of which are here to be produced by the process of the vibrational oscillations, that are of the here given arbitrary bosonic superstring), over the course of one evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric --, will then be increased to a greater general amount of cohomology-related eigenstates, over the course of an ensuing but equal scalar amplitude of an evenly-gauged Hamiltonian eigenmetric.  The more cohomology that is to be generated by a given arbitrary bosonic superstring of discrete energy permittivity over time, the more that physically-based norm-state-projections will tend to be drawn-in or convergent upon the correlative cotangent bundle -- that is here to be directly corresponding to the internal reference-frame of the kinematic-related covariant Lagrangian, that is to be of the proximal locus, that is here to be adjacent to the core-field-density of the moving overall vibrational oscillation of the directly corresponding superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- that is here to work to be directly involving the mappable-tracing, that is of the said discrete quantum of energy permittivity, as it is here to be transferred through its correlative Hamiltonian operand over time. 
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.