Although the cohomology of any given arbitrary open substringular strand is to tend to be conical in a jointal-related manner, -- the cohomology of any given arbitrary open substringular loop tends to be conical in a smoothly-curved-related manner. Let me explain. When the cohomology of an open substringular strand is to be mapped-out externally, from the region of the core-field-density of the said strand outward, in a Ward-Cauchy-related manner -- the correlative physical memory, in a Laplacian-based manner, is to tend to bear two converging linear metrical-gauge-related Hamiltonian operators, that are here to meet in a Gliosis-based manner, at an apex-like conipoint. Yet, when the cohomology of an open substringular loop is to be mapped-out externally, from the region of the core-field-density of the said loop outward, in a Ward-Cauchy-related manner -- the correlative physical memory, in a Laplacian-based manner, is to tend to bear two converging hyperbolic metrical-gauge-related Hamiltonian operators, that are here to meet in a Gliosis-based manner at an apex-like conipoint. The just mentioned hyperbollic-related convergence is to then to bear a set of concavities that are isometric around a central coniaxion, that may be mapped-out along the center of the so-eluded-to region of approach, in a Laplacian-based manner.
I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment