Tuesday, October 17, 2017

Orbifold Eigenset Oscillating In Velocity

Let us initially consider one given arbitrary orbifold eigenset -- that is to be traveling through a discrete Lagrangian, over a gauged-metric.  Next, let's consider that the orbifold eigenset of this case, is to oscillate in its relative velocity -- from one given arbitrary speed in the relative holomorphic direction, to a hightened speed in the relative holomorphic direction, while then going back to its initial speed in the relative holomorphic direction, and so on.  Let us say that this given arbitrary scenario, does not include the Ward-Cauchy-based condition of working to bear perturbative Lagrangian-based spikes.  This will then tend to mean, that those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset, -- will go from one tense of Lorentz-Four-Contraction, to then working to bear a greater scalar amplitude of a tense of Lorentz-Four-Contraction, while then going back to working to bear its initial tense of Lorentz-Four-Contraction, and so on.  This will then tend to mean, that those superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that work to comprise the said orbifold eigenset, -- will go from one tense of Polyakov Action eigenstate, to then working to bear a condition of having a diminished scalar amplitude of a tense of Polyakov Action eigenstate, while then going back to working to bear its initial tense of Polyakov Action eigenstate, and so on.  Furthermore, if the changes in the velocity of the said orbifold eigenset are not of a gradual nature, then, the metrical changes that are thence to be gauged, will be of the nature of working to bear perturbative metrical-based spikes -- of which will work to include the Ward-Cauchy-based conditions of the proximal local existence of metrical-based Chern-Simons singularities, -- that will then be Yukawa to the topological stratum of the said orbifold eigenset, over time.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

No comments: