Monday, January 27, 2014

Tenses of Gaussian Transformations

Often, there are adjacent orbifold eigensets from different universal settings that are each in a relative transit to undergo their respective Gaussian Transformations, in so as to readjust their norm-based conditions.  When this happens, often, the specific mechanism that works to activate the process of the directly corresponding Kaeler  Metric eigenstate is multiplicity utilized -- over consecutive iterations of Gaussian Transformation eigenmetrics --  on the behalf of different orbifold eigenset-based regions that each, individually, appertain to different universal settings that are spatially proximal in the substringular.  This often means, in this case anyhow, that, only one Gaussian Transformation eigenmetric will here be inactivated for the specific locus that would here appertain to each individual universal setting, that is of the just eluded to general substringular neighborhood.  This appertains to the so-stated orbifold eigensets that are of the same universe, when in terms of a relatively transient duration of time for spatial Hamiltonian operators that are each only of the same universe.  This happens as any one of the eluded to specific orbifold eigensets, that are to alter in their norm conditions via the so-stated Gaussian Transformation eigenmetrics,  is to readjust its norm-based spatial conditions.  This is to where the other mentioned orbifold eigensets, that are each of different respective universal settings -- of which are proximal to each other at the Poincaire level, which is true even though these different orbifold eigensets are not Yakawa to each other in a Gliossi manner that is viable, are sequentially being acted upon in a consecutive manner in so as to spontaneously make the necessary changes in norm conditions that are allowed to change -- due to the said activity of the said group metrics of the said Gaussian Transformation eigenstates.  The difference in universal setting is due to the manner-based geni of the directly related intrinsic vibration and angling of both the directly related Planck-like phenomena and the directly related superstrings of discrete energy permittivity.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sam.

No comments: