Part One Of Session Two Of Course 11 -- Orbifolds

The Planck-Related phenomena of parallel universes of our set of universes surround the Planck-Related phenomena of our universe to more of an extent than one would normally think.  The Planck-Related phenomena of parallel universes that mirror our universe, as a complete reflection of our said universe, directly surround the Planck-Related phenomena our universe.  The different angles that the Planck-Related phenomena of different universes, that surround our universe most directly, are normal to our universe -- with the ecception that the angles of these said alterior universes do not bear a covariant codifferentiable angle of relativistc wobble of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees of one of these said universes relative to the other.  Such a condition that I have just mentioned works to cause the mentioned alterior universes to generally be undeterminable to our universe by ordinary means.  Planck-Phenomena are detectible to us by our ordinary means when the angle of vibration of the corresponding Planck-Phenomena is in  a Laplacian condition of orphoganation to each other, when this said angle is  relative to the adjacent Planck-Phenomena by the prior mentioned angle of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees.  When the said angle of vibration is greater, then, the angular momentum of the mentioned Planck-Related phenomena that angle in orphogantion by more of a degree than just mentioned does not have a correlative spin-orbital momentum that exists in four spots as a cross-like Laplacian-based mapping that bears orphoganation upon each other, in a manner that is not Gliossi, so as to not work to allow for a Real Reimmanian Exchange towards each other during the course of a given arbitrary iteration of group instanton.When the exchanges that happen that allow for the recycling of substingular differential geometries via the reallocation of mini-string segments in so as to involve Planck-Related phenomena of one universe to not be Real Reimmanian relative to the holonomic covariant codetermination of certain other Planck-Related phenomena, during a given arbitrary extrapolation of group instanton that more specifically happens during the BRST portion of the mentioned iteration of the said group instanton, then, the two elluded to sets of Planck-Related phenomena are of different universes during the mentioned iteration of group instanton.  Yet, if two sets of Planck-Related phenomena are of different universes, then, the Planck-Related phenomena of what may be described here arbitrarily as the "different" universe are not generally detectalbe to the other universe by ordinary means. 
I have a bit more to say about this. 
I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

Part Two Of Session 1 of Course 11 -- Orbifolds

An individual indsitinguashibally replaced orbifold may exist -- at one time or another -- in up to all 96 spatial dimensions plus time over a group-orientated metric that may involve a relatively inticate Fourier Transformtion.  This spin works to jerk (change the excelleration of) an arbitrarily given Planck-Related phenomenon during a given additive group metric of Ultimon Flow  Since 3*3 = 9 (There are three sets of parallel universes), and 10 spatial dimensions is one more than 9 spatial dimensions --  the Planck-Related phenomenon that is here being discussed must exist in a minimum of ten spatial dimensions plus time when at the locus of the mapping right at the Laplacian delineation of where the said Planck-Related phenomenon is at during BRST.  This is although the reverse-fracal of a photon, which is the basis of discrete energy permittivity, exists in a minium of ten spatial dimensions plus time over a minimum Fourier Transformation.  This is because as superstrings are basically at a standstill during an iteration of instanton, the corresponding Planck-Related phenomena dance at their general locus during the just mentioned duration.  The four ends of a Planck-Related phenomenon exist in four different covariant-based codifferentiably relative spots via its fractal of magnetic field, when in terms of its spin-orbital momentum, when during the correlatvie instantons in which the related said phenomenon is moving as a group along with the other discrete energy that exists here in an orbifold.  This prior activity works to allow for the Imaginary Residue of the mentioned Planck-phenomena to exchage with Fock Space in such a manner so that the directly associated Real Residue of the corresponding superstrings will have the "raw materials" for the said directly associated recycling of the condensed oscillation of mini-string.  (Topological delineation is recycled via the reassortment of the relative distribution of the mini-string that works to comprise discrete energy, substringular fields, norm-states, and other topological phenomena, on account of the need for the mutual reassortment of homotopic residue.  The loci-bases of the directly prior mentioned conditions bears at least some abelian-based wave-tug upon the prior mentioned Imaginary Exchange of the related superstrings and their counterparts, as the corresponding Planck-Related phenomena "dance" in a manner that works to settle the activity of the directly associated Ultimon Flow eigenmetrics that are about to bear holonomic phenomena propagated within the kinematics of their durations.  Such an exchange is named "Imaginary" in part because the exchange is just the end result of many exchanges that multiplicitly happen simultaneously through the relativity of a conipoint of a Global-Based coniaxial that may be mapped within the Ward-Caucy bounds of a given Laplacian -- and, the exchange that here exists is delineated back-and-forth off of the Real Reimmanian Plane.  (As opposed to on the relative Real Reimmanian plane.)
I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

Part One Of Session One Of Course 11 -- Orbifolds

While a Planck-Related phenomenon is wobbling during an iteration of instanton, the relative wobble that happens here works to allow for the spin-orbital momentum, or, the fractal of magnetic field, of the said Planck-Related phenomenon to be orphogonal to the adjacent Planck-Related phenomenon in four different places.  These four "legs" of the said discrete unit of energy impedance (in another words, of the said Planck-Related phenomenon) that are mentioned here works to form fields of Planck-Related phenomena that are known of as orbifolds.  This is because, the more that you can center on a specific locus of a Plack phenomenon-related field, the more that you may depict a "chain" of normalized Planck-Phenomena that are orphogonal to the initial said phenomenon, that is arbitrarily given here by a relativistic wobble of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)i degrees in terms of angular momentum -- if all of the corresponding discrete energy phenomena here are of the same universe.   Yet, the spin and orbit of these said Planck-Phenomena that here have this wobble occurs at four different locations.  This directly prior condition causes the formation of a relatively Laplacian mapping that bears the shape of a cross.  This is due to the condition that the mentioned Planck-Related phenomena, throughout one normal cycle of Ultimon Flow, each spin in ten dimentions over the course of BRST.  (Just as photons, in a reverse fractal-like tense, exist in a minimum of ten spatial dimensions plus time over a minimal Fourier Transformation.)  My right wrist is very tired.  I will continue with the second part of this session later!
You have a phenomenal day!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

A Little Addendum To Genus-Bases of Chern-Simmons Indices

Let us consider a case scenario in which a superstring is projected through a smooth planar curvature in a three-dimensional field in which the shape of the elluded to trace that is thus formed over time is sinusoidal in nature.  The trace vibrates over a Fourier Transformation in a harmonic manner initially.  At one point after the initial vibrational-mode of the said trace, the kinematic projection of the mentioned trace bears an anharmonic pulse that involves a truncation in the sway of the vibration of the kinematic projection of the corresponding superstring that is here moving over time.  The related spot where the truncation happens here is during a point in which the given arbitrary superstring has just reached the point at which it is trying to change in concavity.  (The superstring has here just reached the point where there is to theoretically to be a change in the second derivative of its curvature.)  On account of the anharmonic truncation of the vibratorial oscillation of the trace -- the just mentioned trace, here, being a kinematic projection of a superstring --, causes the trace to not end up changing in concavity at the point in which it normally would, on account of the prior mentioned truncation of the corresponding harmonic mode of its vibratorial oscillation.  As an ansantz, this is due to the mathematical condition that infinity*0+ = 1, and not infinity.  (Or, also, infinity*0(-) = -1, and not -infinity.)  This condition will here cause the mentioned trace to need to reorganize in so that it may actually change in concavity at some future spot, during the translation of the projection of the said given arbitrary superstring over an ensuing metric that involves the here continuing Fourier Transformation of the kinematic motion of the related superstring that we are discussing here.  Yet, if the anharmonic sway of the vibratorial oscillation of the type of trace that I am here discussing is instead bearing an ellongation of its vibratorial sway over an eigenmetric that is part of the overall metric that involves the projection of such a format of substringular motion of a discrete unit of energy permittivity over time, then, the concavity of the curve will still change at the right spot -- if the action of the said ellongation of the vibratorial oscillation that would otherwise be harmonic is made anharmonic right at the spot in which it would tend to change in concavity.  Yet, such a motion would form an additional coefficient of singularity that acts as a multiple of infinity or as a multiple of negative infinity -- based on whether the mentioned ellongation is in the positive holomorphic direction or in the negative holomorphic direction, repectivley.  Such an ellongation in the prior harmonics would then form a tense of spuriousness that would form a detectible jointal-based spike in the relationship of the projection of the kinematic motion of the here discussesd superstring.  Spuriosness, as such in substringular cases, will always involve at least one instanton of an abberation from Noether Flow.
I will continue with the supense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Part Two Of Genus-Bases oF Chern-Simmons Indices

The reverse-holomorphism of the previously mentioned singularities would thus be -infinity,
-infinity^2, -infinity^3, and -infinity^4, -0+, -0+^2, -0+^3, and -0+^4 -- respecitively.  This is based on both the singularities that here refer to a hermitian case and also those singularities that here refer to a non-hermitian case. 
When singularities are based on spuriousness, each truncated jerk in the accelleration/decelleration of the related vibrations of the said trace fors a 0+ based singularity (if holomorphic and in one normal coniaxial framework).  If the related holomorphism is reversed with the initial conditions of what here works to define a positive directoralization, then, the singularity is based on 0- instead of 0+.  If more axials vibrate than that which allow for a condition of hermicity, then, for each added covariance, multiply the truncation-based singularity by 0+ -- for positive holomorphicity, or 0- -- for negative holomorphicity.  This is for one eigenmetric of truncated anharmonic sway.  Ellongated jerks involve the  same concept, yet here involving a multiple of singularity of infinity+ -- for positive holomorphicity, or infinity- -- for negative holomorphicity.  Indiscrete scalars may be multiplied by the values of singularity when there is a given set of conditions of an additional lack of hermicity.  For instance, if a trace similar to what I have mentioned is different on account of changes in all 32 spatial dimensions that are inter-twined in one given set of parallel universes that this situation would here refer to -- and also, if during a set of iterations of instantons that correspond to the directly related Fourier Transformation, the trace of a kinematically projected superstring bears an anharmonic sway that is ellongated during a gauge-metric that is part of the overall group metric in which the mentioned trace is vibrating, then, the superstring, in the course of kinematically traversing the said trace, will bear a singularity of infinity^31*infinity -- or, infinity^32.  Yet, if the mentioned trace that here changes in all 32 spatial dimensions bears an anharmonics that is briefly truncated in a gauge-metric that happens during the same overall group metric in which the said trace is vibrating, then, the trace will here bear a singularity of infinty^31*(0+) -- or, infinity^30.  In both cases, the Chern-Simmons index will bear a genus of 30.  (32-2=30.)  As another example, if the same type of trace that changes in all 32 spatial dimensions of its set of parallel universes is truncated in what may be here described arbitrarily as the negative direction, then the overall singularity that it will bear will be infinity^31*(0-) = infinity^(-30).  As one last example for the day, if the said just mentioned trace bears an ellongated anharmonic sway in the "negative" direction during a gauge-metric that exists within the locus of the extrapolated vibration of the said trace, then, its corresponding singularity at the junction of the change in its dimensionality will be infinity^31*(-infinity) = infinity^(-32).  That's all for now.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam.

Genus-Bases For Chern-Simmons Indices

For every additional axial-related directoral-based sway that the said traversing path that is being mapped-out via a Fourier Transformation, there is an added degree of indiscrete tensorism that is involved with the here corresponding singularity format.  For instance, if a trace that a superstring is being projected through curves through a kinematic path that is moving through a binary coaxial plane, and the said trace vibrates back-and-forth in five different codifferentiable axials over the group metric that involves the related Fourier Transformation in which the corresponding superstring that is pulled through the mentioned trace, as it is swayed back-and-forth via a coniaxial that involves five different spatial axes that are redelineated along the kinematic-based mapping of the action of the mentioned trace, as it is going through its given arbitrary Lagrangian, then, the genus of the Chern-Simmons Index -- when this is in relationship to the here non-hermitian-based singularities -- will here then be of a third-ordered euclidean Hamiltonian operator.  This is on account of the condition that five axials minus two axials forms three axials, and, the existence of a tritiary coniaxial-format that extends beyond the hermicity capability of the given trace, when given the scope of the here present differential geometry, will form singularites that will here involve limits that are tantamount to numbers that are based on both infinity,infinity squared, infinity cubed, and infinity^4.  The Reverse-Dirac functions of such singularities would thus be involving limits that are tantamount to numbers based on both (0+),(0+^2),(0+^3), and (0+^4).  I have got to go now!
I will continue with the supense as soon as I can.
Sincerely,
Sam Roach.

About Some Of What's Coming Up

Hi, this is Sam Roach.  In some of my ensuing posts, I am about to relate some knowledge about certain singularities that appertain to situations that are either completely Chern-Simmons or partially Chern-Simmons.  This conversation that I am about to convey soon relates to situations that involve both non-hermtian case scenarios that are not spurious -- as well as conveying case scenarios that are either hermitian and spurious or not hermitan and spurious.  So, in some of the ensuing posts, I will convey, to a certain degree, what is going on in certain given arbitrary cases that involve either electromagnetic energy, plain energy, entropy, mass, phenomena that is safely translated through a worm-hole, and/or phenomena that is not safely translated through a worm-hole.  The type of knowledge that I will convey here in the ensuing posts that I am reffering to is stough that reffers to the format of singularities that inter-relate to the condition of the superstrings that are involved with the here given arbitrary cases.  These situations that I will work to describe in the posts that I am reffering to will involve cases when the genus of the Chern-Simmons inter-relation involves a genus of one, two, etc... .  The situations will also involve cases in which the conditions of spuriousness involves a genus of one, two, etc... .  Also, cases of spurious conditions may involve singularities that are either infinite and/or infinitessimal.  The conditions of certain of the case scenarios will also consider situations that may also involve inter-relations that combine incidents in which both prior mentioned genus-types are two or more.  The nature of such related case scenarios of singularity formats brings into picture odd function of attributes in which the related conditions are either discrete by infinity, or infinity squared, or... .  Or, the cases may involve situations in which the singularity formats bring into picture odd functions of attributes in which the related conditons are either discrete by (0+), (0+squared), etc... .  Also, such conditions of singularity may consider the relationship of Reverse-Dirac inter-relations in which the corresponding attributes are respectively discrete by (0+). (0+squared), etc..., or, (infinity), (infinity squared), etc... .  The work that I am elluding to also works to describe the inter-relations that involve the previous -- with multiconsideration of changes and inter-relationships that involve cases of relative reverse holomorphicity.  Such knowledge is not only an important heads up to course 16, yet, it also is an important start to understanding what is about to be written as course 11 on Orbifolds.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Basis As To How Cassimer Invariance Works

Cassimer Invariance works to reconnect homotopy during a duration that I call the "space-hole" in such a manner so that mini-string is brought into a topological interconnection between all of the unfrayed superstrings, due to the conditon that black-holes tend to currently "try" to eat up the mini-string that surrounds these during each group instanton.  The reconnection of homotopy is a condition that happens -- whether or not black-holes exist during particular given arbitrary group instantons -- as a mechanism, so that, if a black-hole were to possibly form in any future or present tense, such a formation of a phenomena that unfrays substringular phenomena may not be able to automatically harm the general conditon of homotoy.  The space-hole may also be considered the condition of substringular phenomena almost breaking homotopy so that there may be a reorganization of topological order so that motion may be spontaneously freed up, so that energy may persist.

Substringular Recycling

Substringular Recycling -- The indistinguishably different exchanging of the condensed oscillation of mini-string that allows for the indistinguishable exchanges of superstrings into norm-states that re-exchange back in an indistinguishable manner into superstrings and vice-versa.

String Theory Basis

String Theory -- The study of tiny vibrating hoops and tiny vibrating strands (mainly tiny vibrating hoops) of phenomena that form the discrete energy permittivity that forms the basis of the stough that makes up space-time-fabric.  This includes all of the accomadating phenomena that allows this basis of energy, and its other relating phenomena, to exist.

Some More Stough About The Dangers Of Colliding Gluons

Gluons are hadrons whose metrical activity directly causes leptons and/or quarks to "glue" together in so that protons, electrons, and nuetrons may be formed.
Gluons put the directly prior mentioned subatomic particles to be brought together via an Ante-De-Sitter/De-Sitter gravitational mode.
The metrical activity of gluons as these interbind leptons and/or quarks in such a manner so that the said larger sub-atomic particles may exist -- so that matter may exist in any organized reasonable fashion -- indirectly works, via the extensions of the Rarita Structure, to allow for that delineation of a Hausendorf Projection that is known of as a Wick Action to move through time in a way that it may apply a certain general type of pressure upon a gauge-action that is known of as a Landau-Gisner-Action.  The pressure applied to the just stated Landau-Gisner-Action works upon a field of mini-string via a stratum that is known of as the Fischler-Suskind-Mechanism in such a manner so that leverage may be applied to a small boson that is known of as the Higgs Boson.  The just stated boson acts to raise the Klein Bottle in order for the Kaeler-Metric to occur in the general neighborhood of superstrings that need to soon undergo a Gaussian Transformation. Gaussian Transformations are needed in order for superstrings to regain the permittivity that these need so that the related superstrings may remain as discrete units of energy permittivity -- so that energy may exist at all.
So, bombarding gluons is potentially dangerous to the proper formation and delineation of the Wick Action -- such activity can possibly steer the stated Hausendorf projection in a manner that may veer Gaussian Transformations from doing what these need to do.  Such a corresponding mis-allignment may potentially dominoe in a manner that could keep superstrings from re-obtaining their permittivity, and thus, such a veering may work to cause certain superstrings to not be able to remain as discrete units of energy.
You don't want that.  You want energy to remain as energy so that space-time-fabric may remain safe.
Please end the Hadron Colliding Experiment.
Thank You.
I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely,
Sam Roach.

Relating To Calabi Interactions

Hello, my name is Samuel Roach. First of all, when electromagnetic energy scatters upon a mass, the action here is a Calabi-Yau interaction -- whose sub-space of interaction is a Calabi-Yau Space. Yet, the mass that is struck by a given electromagnetic energy is -- within the mass' orbifold in this case -- Yau-Exact with superstrings that have a light-cone-gauge eigenstates that have a Kaluza-Klein topology. Normally, electromagnetic energy has a light-cone-gauge topology that is Yang-Mills, yet, within the duration of relatively few instantons once this given arbitrary EM energy initially has struck the mentioned mass, its light-cone-gauge topology briefly converts to a Kaluza-Klein topology that consequently converts the configuration of the said light's orbifold to be temporarily virtually Yau-Exact until the described electromagnetic energy begins to requantize back into a beam of photons. Such a tranformation of the Yau-conditions of this EM energy -- as well as such a transformation of the light-cone-gauge topology of the same arbitrarily described EM energy -- happens to any photon over a brief number of instantons when such photons initially scatter upon anything. Yet, unscattered quantized photons are partially Yau-Exact and Yang-Mills. The factor that makes initially scattered photons very different from substringular regions that bear mass is that the initially scattered photons are surrounded by a Yang-Mills eigenset of orbifolds that are partially Yau-Exact in a manner that allows these scattered photons to be briefly tachyonic without having all of the mass in the universe due to an "insulated border" of the described eigenset that pulls these photons back into quantized EM energy. Mass, on the other hand (yet not in a worm-hole) is always completely Yau-Exact and of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology. Orbifold eigensets of a mass are in a static equilibrium that forms a local conformal invariance that is covariant with its surroundings based on more of a direct wave-tug placed upon it by the Rarita Structure via the Ricci Scalar as well -- even though the here related orbifold eigensets bear an exterior that is Yang-Mills yet Yau-Exact. If I make any inadvertant mistakes, let's form a dialogue, and we will learn together.

About Certain Assymetric Needed Delineation

Hello, my name is Samuel David Roach. When you consider the condition that E(6)XE(6) strings that are adjacent are to spin assymetrically, then photons are not to collide head on.

Photons tend to propagate in the direction of their permittivity, such as the inertial nature of all phenomena related to superstrings. Given the construction of the discrete energy permittivity and the construction of the discrete energy impedance of a photon in the Lagrangian Fourier propagation of an arbitrary photon as it is propagated through space-time-fabric, the direct collision of photons head-on would potentially jeapordize the condition of the E(6)XE(6) strings that are directly affiliated with the said arbitrary photons in terms of the natural tendency of such named heterotic strings to spin assymetrically.
E(8)XE(8) strings are to spin assymtrically. So, the bombardment of orbifolds head-on in terms of the related E(8)XE(8) strings invading each others direct Gaussian sub-space would infringe upon the inertial tendency of the mentioned heterotic strings to spin assymetrically.
So, colliding the holomoriphiclly Laplacian-based ends of heterotic strings that are of a substringular nature in our kinematic-based region of space-time-fabric over the course of the Fourier activity of the propagation of such superstrings would infringe upon some basic Pauli-Exclusion-like conditions that are essential for the continued protection of local space-time-fabric. Saying silly things like, "Well, it only creates a fissure!" is like saying, "Well, we only put a little hole in the damm!" When one understands what I am trying to say, it becomes painfully clear that the collision of such hadrons in any such manner is shear foolishness.
Also, the Higgs Action is essential for the continued existence of Gaussian Transformations.
Gaussian Transformations are essential for the spontaneous existence of kinematically-based energy and thus for the continued existence of reality. I dare you to do the math that I prepared back in 2009 as to the dangers of illucidating the Higgs Action. Every eigenstate of such a basis of Action is differentially kinematic for the continued motion of each minute subspace that involves the spontaneously kinematic translation of energy. Without such a translation, energy would be unable to correlate in the manners that allow for covariant Fourier differentiation that is time-wise related, not to mention that the translation of changing norm-conditions allows for the differential reconfigurations that allow for commutations that even allow for the flow of different Laplacian configurations. Therefore, illucidating the Higgs Action should not happen, and the Hadron Colliding Experiment should be shut down for even the simple fact that the continued exsitence of Gaussian Transformations is essential for perpetual change and thus for the continued existence of unfrayed space-time-fabric.
Finally, the strong force is the gluonic force that interbinds leptons and/or quarks -- given what particle you are talking about. Gluons metrical activity are the source of the Wick Action. Am I talking to the wall! My Gosh, the Wick Action is essential for the proper Fourier Translation of the Higgs Action so that the Higgs Action may do its job in allowing the conditon of Gaussian Transformations to happen at all! So, learn all you can, and we will all agree that we need to end the Hadron Colliding Experiment! God Bless You, and so long!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

More As To Certain Dangers (Hadron Colliding Experiment)

 I understand that the Hadron Colliding Experiment is just making a "fissure" in space-time-fabric, as it detects -- indirectly -- apparently a Higgs Boson, yet, does this make sense or not to you, a tiny hole in a dam is not safe!? Black-Holes are a Pandoras Box (whatever the case the spelling is) that should not be opened. If anything, black-holes are to be avoided from being near our range as Earthlings. To me, a "fissure" in space-time-fabric is a "discrete unit" of a black-hole. (Didn't know how to word the last concept better.) Est-ce que vous-comprendez? Do you understand? Si! Nous Somme Ici! We must think about other ways of engineering -- although indirectly -- down to the region local to the Higgs Boson Without Illucidating it. No more details.

To my understanding, a superstring is a discrete unit of energy permittivity.
Directly to its reverse-holomorphic side, there is an inverse field-trajectory-based physical phenomena which is what I call a Planck-Related phenomena -- which acts as a discrete unit of energy impedance. Directly in the forward holomorphic direction of the initially stated superstring is its counterpart -- it is like the string, yet, with counterposing partitions that form the topological sway of its homotopical-based entity. A light-cone-gauge eigenstate interconnects the said Planck-Related phenomena with the said superstring. So, the said light-cone-gauge eigenstate acts as a holomomic substrate in such a way so as to behave as the said Planck-Related phenomenon's counterpart. The light-cone-gauge is not only what works the most in so as to spring superstrings into motion, yet, the vibrations that are formed by the plucking of gauge-bosons upon the second-ordered-light-cone-guage eigenstates works to form those vibrations that indirectly work to cause both gravity, as well as working to cause the gauge-metrics that bring the Wick Action into play. As you well know, the Wick Action is what instigates the beginning of a Gaussian Transformation. Enough said for now. P.S. E(6)XE(6) strings are to spin asymmetrically.
E(8)XE(8) strings are also to spin asymmetrically. These are called hadrons. Colliding these could potentially mess up the root of certain Gaussian Transformations, causing a domino effect. There is to be no "fissure" in the space-time-fabric!!!
Nous Somme Ici! We Are Here! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Hi, this is Sam Roach here. The condition as to whether or not two given different adjacent substringular phenomena are of the same universe or not is dependent on their relativistic norm-condition-based angle of vibration or oscillation via their covariant codifferentiable wobble during a group instanton that is involving both substringular phenomena. If there is a condition of normalcy -- with just the additional advent of a wobble of ~1.104735878*10^(-81)I degrees between their corresponding Planck-Related phenomena, then, the two said adjacent substringular phenomena are said to share a common Gaussian-Based Real-Related (as opposed to Njenhuisly-related) spatial relationship.

To my understanding, the following logic makes sense.
 A superstring is a discrete unit of energy permittivity.
Directly to its reverse-holomorphic side, there is an inverse field-trajectory-based physical phenomena which is what I call a Planck-Related phenomena -- which acts as a discrete unit of energy impedance. Directly in the forward holomorphic direction of the initially stated superstring is its counterpart -- it is like the string, yet, with counterposing partitions that form the topological sway of its homotopical-based entity. A light-cone-gauge eigenstate interconnects the said Planck-Related phenomena with the said superstring. So, the said light-cone-gauge eigenstate acts as a holomomic substrate in such a way so as to behave as the said Planck-Related phenomenon's counterpart. The light-cone-gauge is not only what works the most in so as to spring superstrings into motion, yet, the vibrations that are formed by the plucking of gauge-bosons upon the second-ordered-light-cone-guage eigenstates works to form those vibrations that indirectly work to cause both gravity, as well as working to cause the gauge-metrics that bring the Wick Action into play. As you well know, the Wick Action is what instigates the beginning of a Gaussian Transformation. Enough said for now. P.S. E(6)XE(6) strings are to spin asymmetrically.
E(8)XE(8) strings are also to spin asymmetrically. These are called hadrons. Colliding these could potentially mess up the root of certain Gaussian Transformations, causing a domino effect. There is to be no "fissure" in the space-time-fabric!!!
Nous Somme Ici! We Are Here! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Rationality of Numbers

Often, an irrational Real number (besides pi) is rationally just another way of describing a fraction. Pi is sensible, because it is a scalar value that literally represents how many times of a traversal a half of an arc of a circle is when relative to the radius of the said given arbitrary circle. Again, the second example is similar to the first one.
Take the value of (e^(ipi)). It equals a negative one when one considers the formula isin(pi)+icos(pi). This formula is obviously correct, when one considers the radial delineation of the initial value. ln(e^(ipi))=ln(-1)=0-, which amounts to basically nothing, again, when radially delineated. Yet, if one is to linearly delineate such an imaginary scalar through a physical tensor that amounts to the traversal of an entity in anterior dimensions, then, numbers divisible by i(pi) are not then considered to be such zeroes anymore.
Think about it for yourself: If anterior dimensions and parallel universes are indeed real, is this actually possible?! I will continue with the suspense later! Sincerely, Sam Roach.

More As To the Formation Of Photons

When photons form, electrons drop back an energy level and then go back to their original energy level. When this happens, the individual photons that form are formed via the Fujikawa Coupling that happens according to the Green Function. As a fermionic superstring that acts as a discrete unit of kinetic energy converts into a bosonic superstring that here is a photon, the topology of the open string that converts into a closed string bends hermitianly as the forming photon moves in the direction of energy permittivity. As this is happening, the actual folding of the loose strand of discrete energy acts in the opposite direction as the motion that the said photon is propagated in. -- The forming photon moves in the relative holomorphic direction as it bends to form the said photon in the relative reverse holomorphic direction. Hermitian means smooth in all of the derivatives that are equal to the number of dimensions that it exists in. So, the motion of a discrete strand of energy permittivity closing to form a discrete hoop of energy permittivity is pulled in the opposite chirality of holomorpicity than the direction in which the said forming photon is propagated in. What causes the Fujikawa Coupling to happen in a hermitian manner is the corresponding activity of zero-norm projections that acts at a conipoint that is subtended from the reverse holomorphic side of where the forming photon is propagated. So, the creation of E.M. always involves a smooth topological translation in terms of the here arbitrary example of a fermionic superstring changing into a bosonic superstring. So, in this case, topologically related Hamiltonian Operations are smooth in terms of the basis of relativity. -- The basis of relativity is the motion and the existence of E.M.. Sam.

Another Major Force

The strongest when considered overall, yet, the weakest when taken in a locally sub-Gliossi manner, force, would be that fractal of pressurized vacuum that holds sub-mini-string together in such a manner so that third-ordered-point-particles -- and thus, second-ordered-point-particles -- may be held together. Such a force thereby works in such a manner in so that mini-string may keep together, so that the fields of superstrings may remain fractally vigilant. The ability of the fractal strength of substringular fields works to keep first-ordered-point-particles and also decompacitified substringular fields together so that superstrings, and thus, phenomena, may remain in tact.


Sincerely,

Samuel David Roach.

An Outlook of M-Theory

Hello, this is Samuel David Roach. M-Theory is the study as to the how, why, where, and during what metrics, superstrings tend to exist in membranes that may be described as orbifolds. Orbifolds form a general structural format in which superstrings may differentiate in both timeless and time-oriented delineations so as to form a particle-like and organizational-like basis in which to exist as bases of discrete spaces that may codifferentiate in such a manner in so that norm-conditions may both interact and alter.


The norm-conditions of superstrings must perpetually alter over multiplicit sequential series of interactive instantons so that phenomena may continue to kinematically move around each other so that motion, and thus energy, may persist at existing. The membranous condition of orbifolds works to allow phenomena to coexist as both energy-related, particle-related, and wave-related phenomena at the same focal-based-locus of metrical duration. This works to help explain part of why so much of phenomena may act as both a spot of discrete phenomena (particle-like), a general basis of kinematic motion (energy-like), as well as a displacement of a directoralized trace along a Ward-based Lagrangian (wave-like). This works to explain why electrons -- which, when these drop an energy level and then return back in order to remain in a condition that allows for the most stability, form photons -- are the atomic-based basis of the netting of the basis of pointal mass (particle), the foundation of mass that allows for E.M. to exist (energy), and are also the atomic-based foundation of wave-fronts (waves). Also, the condition that electrons exist in a basis of D-Fields that involve Fourier Transforms that bear a minimum of 6 spacial dimensions plus time over a sequential series of instantons is alagorical to the condition that, when one takes the maximum number of spacial dimensions in Minkowski Space (26 spacial dimensions plus time), and add 6 interactive Njenhuis integrative spacial dimensions, one arives at the 32 spacial dimensions of one set of parallel universes. Neuclons exist in 4 plus time over a Fourier, and 6+4 =10.

Photons exist in a minimum of 10 spacial dimensions plus time in a Fourier.

Also, with steps that I will show at some other time, this is why the first Gaussian Transformation started after the equivalence of the first 50 million instantons. This relates to the condition that E.M. in a vacuum travels at 3*10^8 meters per second, and, 3*10^8/6 = 50 million. I do not know if this has been coined yet, yet, I would venture that one may be able to call the initial Higgs Boson eigenstate an

Isoelliptiabelianoid. I may be a tad wrong on the naming of this initial particle, yet, the rest of what I was saying makes perfect sense to me! I will continue with the suspese later! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

P.S.: I coined the term Isoelliptiabelianoid based on my effort to describe what I described in the end of my blogpost that was titled, The leverage of the Higgs Action in 2009.

samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.

A Little More Good Stuff About The Higgs Boson

Hello, this is Samuel David Roach. M-Theory is the study as to the how, why, where, and during what metrics, superstrings tend to exist in membranes that may be described as orbifolds. Orbifolds form a general structural format in which superstrings may differentiate in both timeless and time-oriented delineations so as to form a particle-like and organizational-like basis in which to exist as bases of discrete spaces that may codifferentiate in such a manner in so that norm-conditions may both interact and alter.
The norm-conditions of superstrings must perpetually alter over multiplicit sequential series of interactive instantons so that phenomena may continue to kinematically move around each other so that motion, and thus energy, may persist at existing. The membranous condition of orbifolds works to allow phenomena to coexist as both energy-related, particle-related, and wave-related phenomena at the same focal-based-locus of metrical duration. This works to help explain part of why so much of phenomena may act as both a spot of discrete phenomena (particle-like), a general basis of kinematic motion (energy-like), as well as a displacement of a directoralized trace along a Ward-based Lagrangian (wave-like). This works to explain why electrons -- which, when these drop an energy level and then return back in order to remain in a condition that allows for the most stability, form photons -- are the atomic-based basis of the netting of the basis of pointal mass (particle), the foundation of mass that allows for E.M. to exist (energy), and are also the atomic-based foundation of wave-fronts (waves). Also, the condition that electrons exist in a basis of D-Fields that involve Fourier Transforms that bear a minimum of 6 spacial dimensions plus time over is alagorical to the condition that, when one takes the maximum number of spacial dimensions in Minkowski Space (26 spacial dimensions plus time), and add 6 interactive Njenhuis integrative spacial dimensions, one arives at the 32 spacial dimensions of one set of parallel universes. Neuclons exist in 4 plus time over a Fourier, and 6+4 =10.
Photons exist in a minimum of 10 spacial dimensions plus time in a Fourier.
Also, with steps that I will show at some other time, this is why the first Gaussian Transformation started after the equivalence of the first 50 million instantons. This relates to the condition that E.M. in a vacuum travels at 3*10^8 meters per second, and, 3*10^8/6 = 50 million. I do not know if this has been coined yet, yet, I would venture that one may be able to call the initial Higgs Boson eigenstate an
Isoelliptiabelianoid. I may be a tad wrong on the naming of this initial particle, yet, the rest of what I was saying makes perfect sense to me! I will continue with the suspese later! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
P.S.: I coined the term Isoelliptiabelianoid based on my effort to describe what I described in the end of my blogpost The leverage of the Higgs Action in 2009.
samsphysicsworld@blogspot.com.

Electromagnetic energy is the basis of what causes the ampllitude of the Polyakov Action, in the manner that the Polyakov Action is what most directly reflects what physically happens so that Lorentz-Four-Contractions may occur in the manner that these do so that physical phenomena may differentiate in a Fourier manner relative to the said general phenomena known of as electromagnetic energy.
What I term of as the Bases of Light helps to determine, along with the light-cone-gauge, the positioning, the Ward Caucy conditions, and the delineation of superstirngs that the relalted massive strings will have in their subsequent iterations during instanton.
Light is the basis of a quantized group of harmonically vibrating bosons in Noether Flow, being directed in a relatively transversal manner thru a relatively unitary Lagrangian over Fourier Transforms -- as a general concept -- going thru enough of a distribution so as to effect and be effected by alterior forms of E.M.. Enough for now! Sam Roach.

A Little Bit Of Refinement About Ways Of Looking At Mass

Hi, this is Sam Roach again! To be more clear and specific, my understanding is that inertial mass has more to do with the tension that exists among various given arbitrary superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that ineract with the activity of the Rarita Structure over time, while, gravitational mass has more to do with the tension that exists between various given arbitrary superstrings of discrete energy permittivity with gravitational-based particles via the Rarita Structure. Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Different Types Of Mass

The whole general idea as to the difference between an interia-based mass and a gravitational-based mass is the integrative effect of the partial wave-tug eigenstates that move along as the corresponding effect of the Schwinger-Indices that differentiate in a Fourier-Based manner along the the corroborative Rarita Structure eigenstate that is local to a here given arbitrary specific general lous. I am limited now in how much I can type at this point, yet, I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.

A Liltle Bit About The Rarita Structure

The Rarita Structure is the topological substrate that works to interbind the light-cone-gauge -- in a strucural manner -- with both gravitational-based particles, the Wick Action, and the given arbitrary superstrings, in such a manner so that gravity may have some sort of abelian-based codetermination with both superstrings, their light-cone-gauge eigenstates, and those norm projections that work to allow for the indirect occurance of Gaussian Transformations, along with allowing for interactions among other norm projections. The activity of the Rarita Structure -- via its Schwinger-basd vibrations -- works to directly in some ways and indirectly in others -- act in such a manner so that such gravitational pulls may happen so that gravity may exist at all. The scalar amplitude of this activity is called the Ricci Scalar.

A Little Bit More Of A Heads Up

1)  A mass has both a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology and Yau-Exact singularities.

2)  Entropy eigenstates have a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology and completely Chern-Simmons singularities.

3)  Electromagnetic energy has a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology and Yau-Exact singularities.

4)  Plain kinetic energy that bears an even accelleration/deccelleration has a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology that has singularites that are not hermitian and not spurious.

5)  Plain kinetic energy that fluctuates in its accelleration/deccelleration has a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology has singularities that are both hermtian and spurious.

6)  Mass that is translated through a worm-hole safely (in this case, it technically is not a mass) has a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology that is not hermtian, and, the said singularities are not spurious.  (Partially Yau-Exact singularities.)

7)  Mass that is translated through a worm-hole in a manner that is not safe (in this case, it technically is  not a mass) has a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology that is spurious yet not hermitian.  (Another case of partially Yau-Exact singularities.)

The directly previous is a heads up to Course 16 that may help one to better understand Course 11.
I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely,
Samuel David Roach.