Session 18 Of Course 10

How do Planck Phenomena-Related-Phenomena propagate?  The strings are in iteration.  Imaginary exchange as described by an odd function happens as real residue is given off and recieved.  This means that the relative bottoms of superstring' will have here exhanged with the tops of stringular counterparts, (The corresponding superstrings and their counterparts are now decompactified by a factor of two as an arbitrary given example.), raising the substringular counterparts in such a manner that these said counterparts are here to move "down" closer to the actual superstrings.  The slack that thence happens causes the "bottom", or norm-to-reverse-holomorphic end, of the corresponding substringular counterparts to exchange with the norm-to-foward-holomorphic end of the associated superstrings.  (This involves a reciprocal Imaginary Exchange.)  This activity that I just described works to lift the superstrings while yet moving these said phenomena "down" closer to the corresponding Planck-Related-Phenomena.  The related said Planck-Related-Phenomena tends to stay relatively stationary as compared to their corresponding superstrings and their corresponding counterstrings, in the meanwhile.  The directly prior mentioned activity works to add wave-tug to the related light-cone-gauge eigenstates like a spring, causing the ensuing Ultimon Flow to be fascilitated.  The said spring-like activity here "flaps" the angular momentum related indices that are most directly associated with the local Phenomena that are eigen with the corresponding respective superstrings and counterstrings in an anharmonic/harmonic cycle that "flaps" just enough to allow for the fascilitation of Ultimon Flow in a manner that one could alagorically compare to the acitivity of a paint stirrer when it is released after it has been torqued without breaking.  Such a spring-like motion that is the result of a fractal of a non-resonant torquing works to twitch the phenomena of the directly corresponding locus.  The twists in the light-cone-gauge eigenstates here work to determine whether or not the related superstrings are to immediately afterward travel at any given arbitrary velocity or not.  A full twist in the fabric of the said directly affiliated light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are respectively to be considered here work to allow for potential basically "infinite" speed-like re-delineation, while any alterior twist quotient that is here-wise determinable that may exist in-between the general locus where the said respective superstrings intermingle with both their corresponding counterstrings as well as their corresponding Planck-Related-Phenomena would thence bear holonomic interaction in either a virtually Gliossi manner or in an actually Gliossi manner.  The said intermingling would exist in such a manner to where the said affiliated phenomena that here are either virtually cohomologically bound or cohomologically bound in the said locus of the individually-based fabric of the corresponding general entity that I am mentioning will tend to have at least a little bit of a significant effect upon the related second-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstates -- the integration of the any directly affiliated second-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstates are what form the holonomic entity of a respective first-ordered-light-cone-gauge eigenstate.  Two-dimensional superstrings may often influence one-dimensional superstrings in such a manner so that the respective light-cone-gauge eigenstates of both the said bosonic and the said fermionic superstrings -- when taken as individually pinpointed interactions -- work to help twist or torque each other's fabric to the proscribed extent that these are to exist in in the manner that involves the least resistance.  The metrical conditions and the related Ward-Caucy boundary conditions that would here be associated with the directly prior mentioned acitivity may be determinable over a sequential series of instantons via an extrapolataion of the related codifferentiation of the corresponding arbitrary given superstrings as well as an extrapolation of the dimensional limits of the said related superstrings in any arbitrary given case that would thence be involved.  Sincerly, Samuel David Roach.