Some More Cool Stuff As To Gravity Waves

The following is like an epiphany. What I term of as Rarita Structure eigenstates, are generally a certain framework of mini-stringular segmentation -- that work here more specifically in so as to help in the inter-relationhip of bringing a kinematic interdependence between the holononmic substrate of quanta of discrete energy And the holonomic substrate of both gravitons and gravitinos. Schwinger Indices are norm-state-projections that act as vibrational oscillations -- that are pushed from the general multiplicit locus of the light-cone-gauge, into the multi varied loci as to where the countless Rarita Structure eigenstates are differentiating at, in a Fourier-based manner, over time. Schwinger-Indices are another manner of basically stating the existence of gravity waves. Both Rarita Structure eigenstates and Schwinger-Indices tend to be different functional groups -- of what tend to be two different genre of zero-norm-state-projection-based Hamiltonian operators, that are of the metrical-gauge-based kind. The main difference, is, that the Rarita Structure tends to act as more of a norm-state-projection-based operand, that acts as well as a template for the activity of gravity-based motion to move upon, while, the Schwinger-Indices act as the Fourier-based oscillation-based genre of that motion by which the interdependence of gravity-based operation may be helped into being brought into existence and spontaneity. The oscillations of the disturbances in space, that are what may be called of here as Schwinger-Indices, act upon the Rarita Structure -- in so as to help to bring in this so-eluded-to interdependence. Maybe this physics model could be improved, yet, this is my current perception. Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To The Flow Of The Second-Order Eigenstates Here

During the Polyakov Action, the correlative second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates are to undergo a general genus of a Clifford Expansion, that works here to bear mini-stringular segmentation that is to consequently be put into the process of being "fed-into" the core-field-density of the directly corresponding first-order light-cone-gauge eigenstate -- in so as to work to help at allowing for those homotopic interconnections, that are here to exist between the directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate and its correlative superstring of discrete energy permittivity, over a correlative fractal of time.  For discrete energy quanta that are of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology -- this will tend to generally mean, that, besides that bending of the directly corresponding second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that is due to the earlier mentioned general genus of such a Clifford Expansion, as well as taking into consideration the condition, that besides the "plucking" of second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates by their correlative gauge-bosons, -- the second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are directly related to such an abelian topology, will tend to bear a relatively intrinsic supplemental wave-tug, during such an iteration of BRST.  Furthermore -- for discrete energy quanta that are of a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology -- this will tend to generally mean, that, besides that bending of the directly corresponding second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that is due to the earlier mentioned general genus of such a Clifford Expansion, as well as taking into consideration the condition, that besides the "plucking" of second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates by their correlative gauge-bosons, -- the second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are directly related to such a non abelian topology, will tend to bear a relatively intrinsic sinusoidal wave-tug, during the course of any case of such an example of an iteration of BRST.
I will continue with  the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Exceptions -- Light-Cone-Gauge Topology

Generally -- if the amending groupings that work to form the homology of a given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, are here to be of the nature of being abelian groupings -- then, the directly corresponding discrete quantum of energy is then said to have an abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  (Kaluza-Klein).  Such correlative discrete quanta of energy, tend to bear a relatively supplemental oriented set of second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates.  Furthermore -- it is generally the case, that, if the amending groupings that work to form the homology of a given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, are here to be of the nature of being non abelian groupings -- then, the directly corresponding discrete quantum of energy is then said to have a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  (Yang-Mills).  Such correlative discrete quanta of energy, tend to bear a relatively sinusoidal oriented set of second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates.
There are two exceptions that I can think of "from the top of my head" -- non-scattered electromagnetic energy and tachyons.  Electromagnetic energy has a homology-related structure, that is comprised of by abelian groupings (it is of a cohomological nature, as it is of a symplectic geometry.)  Yet, since non-scattered discrete quanta of electromagnetic energy have  second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are here to have of a relatively sinusoidal nature, -- non-scattered electromagnetic energy is of a Yang-Mills nature.  (Non-Scatteted electromagnetic energy works to bear a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology.)
Whereas, -- tachyons work to bear second-order light-cone-gauge eigenstates that are relatively supplemenatal.  Yet, since its homology-related structure is comprised of by non abelian groupings -- tachyons are of a Yang-Mills nature.  (Tachyons work to bear a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology.)
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach