Hi there, this is Samuel Roach here! How are you doing today folks!
Today, I am going to provide a little bit more of an explaination as to what I mean by tori-secor-ranges.
What I mean by a "tori-sector-range" is a set of substringular phenomena that comprise one layer of actual reality in one set of parallel universes. The reason as to why I call these individual "layers" tori-sector-ranges is because, when one detects a conformally invariant superstring that is not superconformally invariant, it often appears via detection to behave as a torus when one includes the associated Gliossi-Sherk-Olive field. So, when a very high quantity of such often torroidal appearing phenomena interact as one layer of reality within the multiplicitly Minkowski Space that is integrated into six additional Njenhuis dimensions to form a relatively Hilbert Space (which is thence not defining a holographic space), such a sector of substringular neigborhoods defines a range that comprises one actual layer of reality.
So, how are there layers of reality while yet there is an Overall reality? Every so often, one-ten-thousandth of history -- including the relative past as well as the relative future -- alters. Such a perturbation is when the most kinematic layer of reality switches to a different "tori-sector-range." Yet, during each instanton, all of the tori-sector-ranges are interactive, even though only one of such layers is kinematic in a reverse-fractorially "Gliossi" manner at a time.Every time history alters to an extent, I call this perturbation a Major Reality Change. Yet, since space-time substance tends to be more granular than fabric, it is easier to change the future than the past.
Also, what do I mean by the "Bases of Light?" During the brief metric of what I call the "space-hole" which is in-between the majority of Ultimon Time that is based on Imaginary Time and the quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse-mode which is directly before instanton, the substringular encoders are attached to what reties into Planck Phenomenon related phenomena just as the related substrings are reorganizing in such a manner so as to allow for the appropriate norm conditional sequential spacial differentiations that allow for subsequent Gaussian Transformations, the prior described Planck Phenomenon related phenomena are, for one brief sub-metric, tied together into very large sets of phenomena that are shaped like Planck Phenomena. So, just as quaternionic-instanton-field-impulse begins, which is just before instanton, such large manifestations of Trace untie homotopically and retie homotopically into the googles of Planck Phenomenon related Phenomena that are associated with their correlative substrings.
So, how do these interact without breaking homotopy? Since there is so much potential of abelian-like untying of compacified condensed oscillation among first-ordered-point particles, there is a constant back-and-forth ebbing of mini-string which allows for very distant and close wave-tug interactions.
I wil continue with the suspense later! Sinerely, Sam.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Monday, September 27, 2010
Course 5, Session 8, Part 2
Hi! This is Sam Roach again. How are you?! Now, to continue with the second part of Session 8!
The Bases of Light does what it does because the tieing of superstringular fabric during the sub-metric that occurs when the Bases of Light are manifested is a taught enough stringular tie to pull in at least one stringular encoder into combination with this. The residue of the point phenomena, which is manifested by the tying of these strings is molded back into superstringular fabric within a given Basis of Light. As the just described arbitary Basis of Light is partially undone, the fabric of the manifestation of such a Basis unties to form the countless Planck Phenomenon related phenomena that are associated with such a Basis in such a way that mini-string is not severed, or, in other words, in such a manner so that homotopy is maintaned. This redistribution of mini-string that happens during a sub-metric that transpires just before each instanton helps to form Planck Phenomena types of superstringular substance that frees the points that form strings from being isolated. The point particles related are then caught up with one another. Whenever point particles become caught up with one another, this tieing forms a loosenable by wave-tug 'knot" in spaceformed on account of the associated Basis of Light. The Bases of Light always directly effects a fraction of a nunber of parallel universes involved with the substringular encoder that is directly effected in one tori-sector-range. Each tori-sector range involves 16*10^(98) substrings per universe. Ripples of waves need to follow from the other associated strings of the affiliated tori-sector range to the effected string since the wave-tug of each Basis of Light tugs "through the loop" as the substrings are loosened along with the loosening of the mini-string in such a way so that each substring is associated with one Planck Phenomena related phenomenon via the light-cone-gauge. The strings of the said tori-sector-range then become freed from being strings after instanton to become lightly scattered point particles. Again, only a stringular tie that is associated with one potential eigenstate associated with one Basis of Light will form one substring that is interconnected with one Planck Phenomena related phenomenon which are interconnected via the light-cone-gauge. Such a process may only be frayed one part at a time by black-holes, which are not the best solution to renewing spac-time fabric. Superstings may seem to often be the same stough, yet what is indirectly detected is often indistinguishably different phenomenon that is worked upon from within the overall World-Tube in-between instantons via the activity of imaginary residue (residue that is exchanged in-between instantons). This residue is never wasted in so long as their is no substringular fraying do to black-holes, thanks to Cassimer Invariance.
The Bases of Light does what it does because the tieing of superstringular fabric during the sub-metric that occurs when the Bases of Light are manifested is a taught enough stringular tie to pull in at least one stringular encoder into combination with this. The residue of the point phenomena, which is manifested by the tying of these strings is molded back into superstringular fabric within a given Basis of Light. As the just described arbitary Basis of Light is partially undone, the fabric of the manifestation of such a Basis unties to form the countless Planck Phenomenon related phenomena that are associated with such a Basis in such a way that mini-string is not severed, or, in other words, in such a manner so that homotopy is maintaned. This redistribution of mini-string that happens during a sub-metric that transpires just before each instanton helps to form Planck Phenomena types of superstringular substance that frees the points that form strings from being isolated. The point particles related are then caught up with one another. Whenever point particles become caught up with one another, this tieing forms a loosenable by wave-tug 'knot" in spaceformed on account of the associated Basis of Light. The Bases of Light always directly effects a fraction of a nunber of parallel universes involved with the substringular encoder that is directly effected in one tori-sector-range. Each tori-sector range involves 16*10^(98) substrings per universe. Ripples of waves need to follow from the other associated strings of the affiliated tori-sector range to the effected string since the wave-tug of each Basis of Light tugs "through the loop" as the substrings are loosened along with the loosening of the mini-string in such a way so that each substring is associated with one Planck Phenomena related phenomenon via the light-cone-gauge. The strings of the said tori-sector-range then become freed from being strings after instanton to become lightly scattered point particles. Again, only a stringular tie that is associated with one potential eigenstate associated with one Basis of Light will form one substring that is interconnected with one Planck Phenomena related phenomenon which are interconnected via the light-cone-gauge. Such a process may only be frayed one part at a time by black-holes, which are not the best solution to renewing spac-time fabric. Superstings may seem to often be the same stough, yet what is indirectly detected is often indistinguishably different phenomenon that is worked upon from within the overall World-Tube in-between instantons via the activity of imaginary residue (residue that is exchanged in-between instantons). This residue is never wasted in so long as their is no substringular fraying do to black-holes, thanks to Cassimer Invariance.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Two General Types Of Tangency
Hi! This is Samuel Roach here. What do you think of my blog -- particularly what do you think of my more recent posts! Well, I am writing here today to help my readers understand tangency better. It will be fun!
Tangency specifically refers to a ninety degree relationship. Ninety degrees is like the intersection of a horizontal line with a vertical line. Tangency also reffers to any sort of touch, since, whenever two or more things touch each other, there is a ninety degree angle involved with each of such touchings.
Tangency occasionally means a direct touch or interaction which may either be in one timeless framework of setting (Laplacian), or such a direct type of touch or interaction may involve a time oriented sequential framework of setting (Fourier). When two or more things directly touch or interact, the tangency described here is called a borne tangency.
Tangency occasionally means an indirect touch or interaction which may either be in one timeless framework of setting (Laplacian), or such a direct type of touch or interaction may involve a time oriented sequential framework of setting (Fourier). When two or more things indirectly touch or interact, the tangency described here is called an unborne tangency.
Tangency always involves any sort of touch because whenever two or more things comingle in any way, one may pictorially inscribe a vertical axial with a horizontal axial to explain the basis of the differential geometry that explains the Laplacian and/or Fourier seting of the here described connectiveness.
Tangency always involves any sort of interaction because whenever two or more things cominge in any way throughout any conformally invariant Laplacian or Fourier Transformation or also throughout any perturbative Fourier Transformation, there is going to be some sort of either direct or indirect touch involved that operates in such a way so as to help describe the differential framework and/or differential kinematic operation that the associated things that are involved are going through.
The conditions of the differential operations, operators, and operands that involve just how, what, where, when, and why the specific touchings among substringular phenomena happen are described by norm Ward conditions. Ward Conditins are conditions that involve the intrinsic possibillity of involving more than three spacial dimensions either over a Laplacian condition or over a Fourier condition. The interaction of the norm Ward conditions among substringular phenomena help to define the potential conformally invariant as well as the potentially perturbative interactions that are inevitably spontaneaous over a metric that may involve one ore more instantons. It is the norm Ward conditions through a sequential series of Fourier Transformation that help to determine the settings in which any sort of Gaussian Transformations are to occur. If it wasn't for Gaussian Transformations, the Kaeler Metic could never happen. I will continue the suspense later, Sam.
Tangency specifically refers to a ninety degree relationship. Ninety degrees is like the intersection of a horizontal line with a vertical line. Tangency also reffers to any sort of touch, since, whenever two or more things touch each other, there is a ninety degree angle involved with each of such touchings.
Tangency occasionally means a direct touch or interaction which may either be in one timeless framework of setting (Laplacian), or such a direct type of touch or interaction may involve a time oriented sequential framework of setting (Fourier). When two or more things directly touch or interact, the tangency described here is called a borne tangency.
Tangency occasionally means an indirect touch or interaction which may either be in one timeless framework of setting (Laplacian), or such a direct type of touch or interaction may involve a time oriented sequential framework of setting (Fourier). When two or more things indirectly touch or interact, the tangency described here is called an unborne tangency.
Tangency always involves any sort of touch because whenever two or more things comingle in any way, one may pictorially inscribe a vertical axial with a horizontal axial to explain the basis of the differential geometry that explains the Laplacian and/or Fourier seting of the here described connectiveness.
Tangency always involves any sort of interaction because whenever two or more things cominge in any way throughout any conformally invariant Laplacian or Fourier Transformation or also throughout any perturbative Fourier Transformation, there is going to be some sort of either direct or indirect touch involved that operates in such a way so as to help describe the differential framework and/or differential kinematic operation that the associated things that are involved are going through.
The conditions of the differential operations, operators, and operands that involve just how, what, where, when, and why the specific touchings among substringular phenomena happen are described by norm Ward conditions. Ward Conditins are conditions that involve the intrinsic possibillity of involving more than three spacial dimensions either over a Laplacian condition or over a Fourier condition. The interaction of the norm Ward conditions among substringular phenomena help to define the potential conformally invariant as well as the potentially perturbative interactions that are inevitably spontaneaous over a metric that may involve one ore more instantons. It is the norm Ward conditions through a sequential series of Fourier Transformation that help to determine the settings in which any sort of Gaussian Transformations are to occur. If it wasn't for Gaussian Transformations, the Kaeler Metic could never happen. I will continue the suspense later, Sam.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)