The Nature Of Dimensionality And The Transiency Of Ghosts

Let us initially consider an orbifold eigenset, that moves in a p-field.  A p-field is a substringular field, that exists -- over any respective given arbitrary Fourier-based translation -- in a minimum of ten spatial dimensions, plus time.  Consider the physical memories that are to be formed as those cohomological-based tracings, that are formed by the projection of the trajectory of those superstrings that act in so as to behave as the orbifold eigenset-based Hamiltonian operator, that is of any of such a respective p-field.  These so-eluded-to ghost anomalies that are thence formed, will initially be formed in the organization of one Reimman-based scattering -- to where these so-eluded-to coholomogical-based tracings are to later be broken down by an ensuing Rayleigh-based scattering, that will eliminate the initially said formed ghost-based pattern.  Next, consider a d-field.  A d-field is a substringular field that exists -- over any respective given arbitrary Fourier-based translation -- in a minimum of six spatial dimensions, plus time.  Consider the physical memories that are to be formed as those cohomological-based tracings, that are formed by the projection of the trajectory of those superstrings that act in so as to behave as the orbifold eigenset-based Hamiltonian operator, of any of such a respective d-field. These so-eluded-to ghost anomalies that are thence formed, will initially be formed in the organization of one Reimman-based scattering -- to where these so-eluded-to cohomological-based tracings are to later be broken down by an ensuing Rayleigh-based scattering, that will eliminate the initially said formed ghost-based pattern.  The Fourier-based translation of a p-field, will tend to work to bear the elimination of its ghost-based pattern in a quicker manner -- than the Fourier-based translation of a d-field will tend to work to bear the elimination of its ghost-based pattern.  The tendency is -- that the higher the dimensionality is of any respective given arbitrary  Fourier-based translated field -- the quicker, timewise,  that their directly corresponding ghost anomalies or cohomological-based patterns will be annharmonically scattered out of existence.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Ensuing Part As To Entropic Photons

You can probably see the pattern of what happens to a photon, that has just become entropic -- for the immediately ensuing iterations of group-related instanton, if the said photon does not once again scatter upon another holonomic substrate of physical phenomenology in the meanwhile.  For the fourth set of 64 consecutive iterations of instanton that the said entropic photon is going through, starting upon its direct impact upon another phenomenology, it will work to bear what may be described of as having holomorphic torsional-based eigenindices that will bend in a hermitian-based manner, in up to three of the ten correlative coniaxions that are related to the spatial dimensionality that the said photon is moving through.  This is because the so-stated entropic photon will tend to bend here in ten spatial derivatives as it is moving in a minimum of ten spatial dimensions, plus time, over the course of the said entropic photon being in the process of being delineated through time and space.  This will then work to decrease the degree of the genus of the so-eluded-to Chern-Simons nature of the so-stated entropic photon -- seeing that it will, during the said fourth consecutive set of 64 said iterations of being "entropic," be Chern-Simons now, in a Lagrangian-based manner, in only seven of the ten spatial coniaxions that it is moving through, instead of being Chern-Simons in a Lagrangian-based manner in eight of such covariant and codifferentiable Fourier-translated coniaxions that are directly related to the ten spatial dimensions that such a given arbitrary photon is going through, as a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator, as it is tending to change in this Fourier-based process in up to ten spatial derivatives, over time.  This will work to cause such an entropic photon to still be partially Yau-Exact.  Such a photon will still work to bear here -- what may be deemed of as an abelian or as a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology.  This will be the tendency of such, during the 193rd to the 256th of such consecutive iterations -- upon colliding with another physical phenomenology, in a Gliosis-based manner at the Poincare level -- if such a photon does not directly strike another orbifold eigenset in a direct manner in the meantime.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Next Part Of "Entropic Photons"

Let us consider what tends to happen, over the course of the third set of 64 consecutive iterations of group-related instanton, that start from the moment that the respective given arbitrary photon acted in so as to strike another holonomic substrate-based physical phenomenology, in a Gliosis-based manner, at the Poincare level -- up to the ensuing so-eluded-to iterations of group-related instanton, by which I am about to describe as happening.  In so long as the so-eluded-to "entropic photon" does not act in such a Fourier-based manner, in so as to strike another orbifold eigenset -- from the instant that the directly associated respective photon has worked in so as to make a direct and immediate contact with another orbifold eigenset-based phenomenology, up to the so-proscribed and the soon to be described set of what are to here be mentioned, as being of the successive series of iterations of group-related instanton, -- that go from the 129th consecutive iteration of such a successive series of instantons that start from the moment of impact, up to the 192nd consecutive iteration of the self-same successive series of instantons, that had started from the moment of impact -- the same "entropic photon" will be mildly partially Yau-Exact -- since only two of the holomorphic-based coniaxions of the torsional-based eigenindices, that are to here be related to the contorsioning of the holonomic substrate of the said "entropic photon," will bear a bending that is of a hermitian-based nature.  The rest of the holomorphic-based coniaxions of the so-eluded-to torsional-based eigenindices are here to bend in a Lagrangian-based Chern-Simons nature.  The light-cone-gauge topology of the said "entropic photon," will here be of an abelian or of a Kaluza-Klein nature, instead of being as a Yang-Mills nature.  This is in contrast to the light-cone-gauge topology of a non-entropic photon -- of which is of a Yang-Mills nature.