A Clarification, In Lieu Of The Grassman Constant

 The Grassman Constant, is a universal constant in physics. Superstrings tend to behave in such a manner, to where these appear to "want" to maintain the Grassman Constant, by keeping a Noether-Based Flow, by retaining a relatively orientable nature, when this is here to be taken, in terms of their general Ward-Cauchy-Related behavior. In the process of a superstring maintaining a sense or oientability, by my particular model of string theory, the field that is here to be latent in covariance, between the said superstring and its counter string, is to be of a heuristically homeomorphic nature. When this is to occur, the implicit discrete quantum of energy in question, is to remain of a Noether-Related nature, to where it will thereby spontaneously continue to move in a heuristically relativistic manner. This is to happen, when the eminently corroborative general tense of Betti Action involved here, is to work to involve either an even Imaginary ordering, when going into the eminently implicitly involved increment of BRST AND/Or when the eminently corroborative general tense of Betti Action involved here, is to work to involve an even Imaginary ordering, when going into the eminently implicitly involved increment of an ensuing Regge Action. If the Betti number involving the Betti Action, over the course of both of the two implicit incremental duration-related processes, is to only be odd, then, the eminently corroborative field that is latent in covariance, between the here involved super string and its directly associated counter string, may not be homeomorphic, if such a superstring is to spontaneously remain of a Noether-Based flow, to where the Grassman Constant is not able to be maintained, IF the superstring is here to spontaneously remain of a Noether-Based nature. Yet; The Grassman Constant is a Universal Constant, so it WANTS to be maintained. So; What happens, is that, instead of the said involved superstring remaining Noether-Based, it will then ensue, in so as to spontaneously become tachyonic, instead. So, Yes, the Grassman Constant is always to tend to be maintained, yet, if the Ward-Cauchy-Related Field is to threaten otherwise, the directly related discrete quantum or quanta of energy, will consequently spontaneously go, from being of a Noether-Based nature, to then subsequently becoming, instead, of an eminent taciyonic-related nature. 

When different interacting thought frequencies co-mingle, in a hermitian manner, this often tends to form agreement. Furthermore; When different interacting thought frequencies co-mingle, in a spurious manner, this often tends to form disagreement. 

Everyone, with their head adequately squared away on their shoulders, knows, that if variable one times one equals variable two, that variable two times one will thence equal variable one. Yet; If variable one times i equals variable two, it will actually be -i times variable two to equal variable one. This is because i*[-i] equals one.

A circle spinning around, in eminent association with a line going back and forth, distinctively represents the geometric motion, that complex numerical de notation works to impart. So; a holomorphic driven line, that is here to be eminently corroborative, in geometric covariance, with a spinning circle, may be said to work to represent, the gist of the general venue, of forward moving time. Furthermore; an anti holomorphic driven line, that is here to be eminently corroborative, in geometric covariance, with a spinning circle, may be said to work to represent, the gist of the general venue, of backward moving time. The NOW, is the balance, between forward and backward moving time. The purpose of a clock, in part, is to eminently extrapolate some sort of a sense, of a configuration of the NOW. So, understanding the general geometric implications of complex numbers, may viably facilitate, an improved understanding, of the nature of time. (Antikythera).

Part 1; How The Stated Trinomial Eigenstates Apply

 Grand Unified Field Theory: (See the post, Enhancement Of The Kahler-Metric, from March of 2023).

Introductory Explanation:

What The given arbitrary equation, of which utilizes, what I term of as being, trinomial eigenstates, is to be acting to describe, Are the attributes of physical nature, of a given region in time and space, as heuristically contingent, upon its environment. 

For any region of Stoke’s-Based field, in which 1<N<= 26; ( where N is an integer) — To where this is to be the case, for the mathematical situation of SERIES, that I have provided; (Yet; When in lieu of, as to what the “knot” of trinomial eigenstates happens to be, for that particular region, (that is, when working to determine the knot of trinomial eigenstate), the value of N, refers to a Cotangent Bundle, that will be anywhere from 3 to 96 (since this utilizes Chern Simons Theory)). Furthermore; Although, as everyone in math tends to know, in Euclidean use, the natural log of one is zero; Yet, with a Cartesian utilization of mathematics, the natural log of one may often tend to be 2PIin. When the eluded potential application of such a case is to occur, small n is to be simply 1.  So, depending upon where in the “ equation “ you are looking at, N may be anywhere from 2 to 26; N may be anywhere from 3 to 96; Or, N may be simply 1. In the “knotting equation “ of trinomial eigenstate, N is a single integer per layering, that is anywhere from 3 to 96. In the potential Cartesian case, where there is no viably present Planck Energy, small n is one. Whereas; In the summation (series),that is in the math that I did, N is recursively altered, from equaling one to equaling anywhere from 2 to 26 — depending upon the pertinent magnitude of Stoke’s-Based spatial dimensionality. So: Each centralized knot, (of which is eluded to, with the idea, as to the mentioned implicit trinomial eigenstates), is delineated in a twined configuration, that is anywhere from 3 to 96 spatial dimensional. The Stoke’s -based region itself, per potentially layered region, is comprised, in anywhere, from 2 to 26 spatial dimensions plus time. And the Cartesian implicit idea that I have eluded to earlier, is here to be considered, in a heuristically reductional case, in which small n is 1. I hope that this is clear now! If not, please ask any pertinent questions!

Use the hereupon Grand Unified Field Theory Equation, to determine, with at least some sort of viable expectation value, what the corroborative holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric, is to be expressed of as. I just Started to indicate how the eminently corroborative equation in consideration is to be utilized. I will continue with this explanation, a little bit more, in a future encounter. Till next time, Later! SAM ROACH from PINCKNEY MICHIGAN!

Hello.  I’m back! 

To get back to what I was saying about the attempted grand unified field theory equation:

There are 112 reductional “gamma knot of the field” general tenses to consider — simply for cotangent bundle R(sub N) alone, to consider. Depending upon the eminently associated Stoke’s-Based region, that one may have involved in such an implicit situation, one may often thereby, be potentially put into a situation, in which one is to find a resultant R(sub N), that can be formed, or formulated, by finding an intersection of such reductional fields. The more of a selection of co-deterministic interdependently interactive fields that are to be hereby considered, as being or acting upon the given arbitrary focused upon region, the greater that the expectation value is to consequently tend to be, as to what the determined holonomic substrate is to be tabulated as. Understanding what the holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric is to be, for a given arbitrary region in time and space, with a relatively high expectation value, may often work to help facilitate an increased knowledge, as to how such an implicit place in time and space is to behave. One is thereby, to have the viable potential, of any possible combination of the 112 implied "gamma knot of the field" trinomial eigenstate-related templates, when in conjunction with the viable potential, of any possible combination of regions, that may be tantamount to working to involve anywhere from 2 to 26 spatial dimensions plus time, when in conjunction, with the viable potential, of working to consider, any of the shapes and energy-related magnitudes, that may here to eminently corroborative, with the multiplicity of the general multi-considerate Stoke's-Based field of this.

In theory, if one were to consider a very large number of such co-deterministic interdependently interactive fields, one could potentially have a spontaneously immense predicated knowledge, of the viably possible behavior, that one could respectively gander to surmise, within reason, as to a relatively educated guess, as to how the region and its component parts, is relatively likely to act, in such a case.

I will continue with a furthered explanation, LATER!!! (Such as a set of pictures, showing 56 pairs of my 112 reductional "gamma knot of the field" general tendencies, for cotangent bundle R(sub N), when in terms of, here, the trinomial eigenstates, of which are here to be determined, to help to be able to solve, in lieu of the "equation" that I have provided, in, "Enhancement Of The Kahler-Metric," in so as to be able to facilitate the general process, of having the capability, of working to refine a knowledge, as to what the holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric is to be, for any Stoke's-Based region in time and space.)

Sincerely, Sam Roach!