What I believe the equation is, for determining what the discrete increment is to be, for the "sub-force" of metric-compactification, when given what the correlative Betti Number is to be:
(i*e^((The Betti Number)/(2*PI)))/(1/(e^(The Betti Number)))*(i*PI(del) Action)*(Zero-Point-Energy).
So; if the Betti Number is 0, such a said sub-force is simply:
i*(i*PI(del) Action)*(Zero-Point-Energy) -- Since e^0 is 1.
If the Betti Number is 1, such a said sub-force is: ~ 3.187*i*(i*PI(del) Action)*(Zero-Point-Energy).
If the Betti Number is (-1), such a said sub-force is: ~ -3.187*i*(i*PI(del) Action)*(Zero-Point-Energy).
However; If the Betti Number is 16, --
such a said sub-force is ~ 1.13404425*10^8*i*(i*PI(del) Action)*(Zero-Point-Energy).
And, If the Betti Number is (-16), --
such a said sub-force is ~ -1.13404425*10^8i*(i*PI(del) Action)*(Zero-Point-Energy).
As Inferred: It takes an integration of basically countless of such discrete increments of an eluded-to "sub-force," to be able to get a superstring to compactify/decompactify:
Let me know whether or not that this equation makes an adequate amount of logical sense, or, if you think that such an equation is here to need some modification. Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment