Epiphany

This is like an epiphany. What I term of as Rarita Structure eigenstates, are generally a certain framework of mini-stringular segmentation -- that work here more specifically in so as to help in the inter-relationhip of bringing a kinematic interdependence between the holononmic substrate of quanta of discrete energy And the holonomic substrate of both gravitons and gravitinos. Schwinger Indices are norm-state-projecitons that act as vibrational oscillations -- that are pushed from the general multiplicit locus of the light-cone-gauge, into the multi varied loci as to where the countless Rarita Structure eigenstates are differentiating at, in a Fourier-based manner, over time. Schwinger-Indices are another manner of basically stating the existence of gravity waves. Both Rarita Structure eigenstates and Schwinger-Indices tend to be different functional groups -- of what tend to be two different gene of zero-norm-state-projection-based Hamiltonian operators, that are of the metrical-gauge-based kind. The main difference, is, that the Rarita Structure tends to act as more of a norm-state-projection-based operand, that acts as well as a template for the activity of gravity-based motion to move upon, while, the Schwinger-Indices tend to act more as the Fourier-based oscillation-based genre of that motion by which the interdependence of gravity-based operation may be helped into being brought into both existence and spontaneity. The oscillations of those disturbances in space, that are what may be called of here as Schwinger-Indices, act upon the Rarita Structure -- in so as to help to bring in the so-eluded-to interdependence. Maybe this physics model could be improved, yet, this is my current perception. Sincerely, Samuel David Roach. I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!

Time Is What It Is

 Dear Readers, my idea as to what time is, is that is it the sequential series of group-related instantons. My belief is that there is the iteration of ~473,364*10^(55) iterations of group-related instanton -- a compilation of the "equivalence" of 15 billion years in 13.7 bilious years -- since the rate of group-related instanton has slowed over "time." (Like a bullet goes at its fastest at its beginning.) Each of such group-related instantons happens at the same "time," as this is integrated into the existence of multiple universes, that, when of the same set of universes, are all intermingled. The predominant layer of reality will then vary, until Tau as a whole bears at least some sort of renewal, after the said number of iterations of group-related instanton have "happened."

Part 14 Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The torsional "orientifolds" that work to comprise that part of a worm-hole, that is just to the exterior of that general sector of its semi-anuulus-based section, works here in so as to form an integration of six different smoothly compiled two-dimensional surfaces, -- that come together in so as to form a torsional toroidal Minkowski Space, that is the equivalence of a heuristically majorized Hilbert Space (of a 12 spatial dimensional region of space).  This said integration of six general sets of two-dimensional flat space contours, works to act as a doubling-up of the initial dimensional compactification -- that exists from within what would exist in the Ward-Caucy-based bounds for the spatial dimensionality of an electron -- of which exists in what is known of as a d-field, and, a d-field exists in six spatial dimensions plus time (6*2=12).  I am here just referring to the bare minimum spatial dimensionality that is to exist for such fields in a minimum directly related Fourier-based differentiation.  So, when one takes the initial Laplacian-based condition of the 12-spatial dimensional Minkowski spatial contour of the ulterior Ward-Caucy boundaries that are of a worm-hole, and when we consider this as the divulging of a flat six spatial dimensional space that works to here complete its Mobiaty at both ends, in so as to form, in a sense, an arena of 12 spatial dimensions plus time -- to where the Lagrangian-based path of the said worm-hole will then work to form the equivalence, as well, of a heuristically majorized 10-dimensional field, -- that works to form those two extra sets of complex-roots, that work to pull (or to actually push), as an added Minkowski-based leveraging, in so as to work to project the propagation of phenomenology that moves relative to both the existence and the motion of electromagnetic energy -- to be "pulled" into the cross-product-based delineation of the respective given arbitrary contorsioning of space-time-fabric -- that is due to the wave-push of the Hamiltonian eigenindices of the so-stated worm-hole.  This acts as a sense of working to complete the second-side/second-edge of physical phenomenology, over the potential warping of space-time-fabric -- since the release of the spare energy from an electron is what works to form the holonomic substrate of electromagnetic energy.  This happens as is according to the Green Function via the Fujikawa Coupling.  I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Thirteen Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The earlier mentioned "Sterling Lagrangian" or "Sterling Hamiltonian Operand" related Ward-Caucy-bearing condition of a worm-hole, works to for a loop -- that bends without the added set of Ward-Caucy conditions that would here be working to form what would otherwise be a tense of jointal-based-space-time-fabric, -- since the contorsioning or the bending of space-time-fabric, that is directly associated with the Fourier-based differentiation of a worm-hole, is of a Doubolt-based nature, -- that will here tend to be piecewise continuous in a manner that does not tend to cause the Laplacian-based conditions for any spurious Lagrangian-based Chern Simons singularities, from within the Li-based setting of the general Hamiltonian-based field operation, that would work here in so as to operate in so as to help to form the torsional toroidal-based leveraging and pulley-based set of wave-tugs/wave-pulls(pushes), -- that would here work to form that general tense of gyration/oscillation-based Hamiltonian-based operators, that would here function in so as to bring the incoming holonomic substrate of phenomenology towards its furthered positional-based destinations of exit.  This would then tend to work to make the light-cone-gauge topology of any given arbitrary worm-hole, to be basically of a completely Yang-Mills or of a non abelian-based nature.

The Thrilling Part Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

In a certain sense, the toroidal-based compilation that works to form the holonomic substrate of the phenomenology of a worm-hole -- is an integration of what would otherwise act, as the integration of torqued semi-Laplacian-based orientifolds -- these of which would then work here to form the surrounding light-based energy, that works to encapsulate the semi-anuulus of the said given arbitrary respective worm-hole -- by which the entering phenomenology that is to be transferred through the so-stated worm-hole is to be pulled through, by the performance of a multiplicit "Green Function" that exists as a semi-Fourier differentiating "Sterling Lagrangian (or Sterling Hamiltonian Operand)," that works here to bear torsional toroidal-based flaps, -- that are here to be formed out of space-time-warped "Wilson Lines" that are here to be shut at the end of the worm-hole, where the entering phenomenology has come in --- to where the automation of the torsioned "Wilson Lines" that are of the so-stated worm-hole, are to then gyrate and oscillate in such a manner -- that works to act as a kinematic "screwing process," that works to both leverage and pulley the holonomic substrate of the entering phenomenology, in so as to re-translate the contorsioned or bent space to a furthered space-time-bearing of position, in so as to open at the point of re-entry, -- whereupon, the so-stated respective worm-hole as a whole is to at least temporarily be closed.  To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

A Little Bit To Add On To The Last Part Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The Kunneth formulation of any given arbitrary worm-hole is, in general, of a Njenhuis-based tense.  Worm-Holes may be typified as being thought of as off of the Real Reimmanian Plane -- when this is taken in a multiplicit manner.  This would then work to elude-to the condition that worm-holes may then be thought of as being in a general categorization, of an entity-based phenomenology -- that has a general bearing of being of a Fock Space space-time-fabric-based nature.
To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

A Little More As To Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

As when something that is of a relatively macroscopic level than that of the substringular -- that is of a holonomic substrate, is to move upon an ulterior given arbitrary operand, -- in so as to work interdependently, through a respective Fourier-based kinematic differentiation, in a manner that is to form a tense of static charge on account of the resultant formation of a correlative tense of static friction -- is to act in so as to tend to form a certain scalar amplitude of heat or infrared energy to a certain extent, -- the said activity of the general Fourier-based differentiation of a beam of electromagnetic energy, or a beam of light, that is to move upon the Hamiltonian operand of a medium that is other than that of the physical presence of a vacuum, will then tend to work to form at least a certain degree or a certain scalar amplitude of the presence of heat or infrared energy, -- as the Fourier-based activity of the kinetic interplay of any respective given arbitrary scattering of light, will then tend to always work to form, in the process of the formation of entropic photons, at least a certain degree or a certain scalar amplitude of what may here be described of as infrared photons.  This general said tendency --  as to the formation of the presence of a certain quantum of heat energy, whenever any electromagnetic energy is to scatter in a Gliosis-based manner upon any given arbitrary phenomenology other than a vacuum, is to here be akin to the factual condition that is of a relatively macroscopic level, that whenever there is the presence of a static charge that is to here be formed by the Fourier-based kinematic activity of the general course of action that is known of commonly as static friction, that there is then to be in such a case, the general tendency of such a said kinematic differential activity to as well tend to always work to form at least a certain degree or a certain scalar amplitude of the physical condition of the presence of a certain resultant of a quantity of heat energy.  Such an added formation of a certain quantum of heat energy -- that is to here form at any given arbitrary general locus -- will always tend to work to form the condition of an increased scalar amplitude of the differential-based existence of infrared or heat energy, at the so-eluded-to specific locus, at which the said general heat energy is to be generated or formed. This would then tend to work to here increase the temperature that is to then exist at the specific locus, where the heat energy is formed -- for at least a transient quantum of time, or, for a transient integration of the correlative Hodge-Indices of what is to here be the ensuing sequential series of group-related instantons.  In this so-stated general manner of activity, the formation of static charge is to here act like an inverse fractal of the so-stated activity of both the formation and the activity of entropic photons.  In both of these general cases, the Laplacian-based condition of both of these general tendencies of Ward-Caucy-based activities, will here tend to indirectly form the so-stated heat, via the manner by which the formation of the multiplicit respective fractal of static charge, as well as the formation of entropic photons, acts upon the general respective operands through which the said activities of the respective formation of the fractal of static charge and the scattering of electromagnetic energy are to  then happen, upon the general said medium through which these are to be translated over time.
To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

A Thought To Explain

Think of a quantum of light -- that is here in the form of an orbifold eigenset of light, that is comprised of many photons -- as an "oblong log of energy."  As the imagined "oblong log of energy" moves into a Hamiltonian operand, that may here be thought of as a medium other than a vacuum -- the orbifold eigenset works to form a fractal of  "static friction," in which the individually taken entropic photons are to then be multidirectorally scattered in a manner that is to here be similar to what I have just metaphorically described.  Think of the metaphorical "sparks" of the so-stated fractal of "static friction" as being the so-eluded-to initially scattered entropic photons.  Perhaps this will make you more able to understand my last post.  I will continue with the suspese later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Part Ten Of The Twelvth Session Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

Let me start out with an obvious ansantz -- of which is to here be followed by an explanation of a concept, which will here at that point, be of more of a simpler degree of thought to be understood than otherwise.:  Any given arbitrary imaginary number that is to be multiplied by another given arbitrary imaginary number -- if both of such so-stated imaginary numbers are of a positive imaginary-based nature -- will then result in the computation of what will then be of a negative Real-number-based nature.  Nextly, any given arbitrary Real-number-based value that is to then be multiplied by another given arbitrary Real-number-based value, will then result in the computation of what will here be another value that is of a Real-number-based nature.  Any given arbitrary Kunneth formulation, that would here work to involve the directly corresponding import of a Yukawa-affiliated Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology, -- will then result in the Hodge-based adding of the directly associated orbifold eigensets, that are to here be of the so-eluded-to non abelian, or, in other words, of the so-stated Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology, to where such a euclidean additive process would then work to acrue to a set of compiled imaginary, or, in other words Njenhuis indices -- since the directly corresponding Yang-Mills symmetry may here be described of as being of an imaginary-norm relation -- to what would here be of a kinematic interaction that is to happen here, towards the directly correlative entropic Real Reimmanian Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge-based supersymmetry.  Here.  Let us consider here a set of photons - that, when not scattered, are always to tend to be here of a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology -- that are to quantifically strike and then scatter upon another initially set phenomenology.  The electromagnetic energy, or, in other words, the quantized set of photons -- are to then act in so as to scatter, in what may here be described of as a Calabi-based interaction -- of which will then tend to work in so as to form a Gaussian inter-relation, that is known of as as gauge-transformation. The thus entropic photons, when this is taken immediately after these so-stated photons have been scattered -- will then tend to be perturbated from the initial Yang-Mills topology, into what is to now to be of a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology, BUT NOT OF A YAU-EXACT NATURE -- for the initial 384 iterations of group-related instanton, right after the said collision for each individually taken scattered photon is to happen, which is again right after these said photons have acted in so as to bear their correlative Gliosis-based contact, with the multiplicit holonomic substrate that these have collided with.  Even though the overall said scatterered quanta of electromagnetic energy is slowed-up, when it strikes a medium other than a vacuum -- the initially entropic photons are to here initially be sped-up in a flow that is not of a Noether-based nature -- during the said initial 384 iterations of group-related instanton, after these have collided with a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator, in a Gliosis-based manner.    Immediately after the said 384 initial instantons in which these entropic photons had just sped-up, these respective photons are to then slow-down to a greater scalar amplitude than these had initially sped-up.  Yet, the process of the directly correlative orbifold eigenset -- being put into a "position" in so as to need to "catch-up" with the said entropic photons, as these said scattered photons are being multidirectorally scattered -- works to tend to involve the ironic condition, due in part to the means of the activity of this said "catching-up,"  that scattered light that strikes any medium other than a vacuum will always tend to go slower than light would otherwise travel at, as it is traveling through any of such a medium other than a vacuum, -- as is according to Snell's Law.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Nine Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The Laplacian integrative structure of the 12 spatial dimensions that work to comprise the heuristically majorized Hilbert Space -- that is to here directly affiliate with the spatial premises of a worm-hole -- when this is taken over a sequential series of those iterations of group-related instanton that are to happen, during the integrative overall general quantum of time in which such a so-stated worm-hole is to exist as a metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator of a set of orbifold eigensets, that act, in so as to work at bending or contorsioning the space that surrounds them, will happen in so as to pull any given arbitrary entities of holonomic substrate that are to enter into the Ward-Caucy bounds of their kinematic Fourier-based operational leveraging, in such a manner in so as to translate the so-stated or the so-inferred entering phenomenology, --  into a process of being translated in such a tendency of being initially stationed at one general specific locus, into later being stationed at another totally different general specific locus.  This happens via the kinematic activity of the torsional-based sliding of the internal Li-based Gaussian indices, that are of the interior of the here stated respective given arbitrary worm-hole, -- from one initial Minkowski-based Laplacian set of Jacobian-associated eigenindices, to an ensuing Minkowski-based Laplacian set of Jacobian-associated eigenindices.  This general format of activity, will bear two sets of additional complex roots than that of a p-field, per eigenpulsation of the bending of the eigenbase of the Laplacian-associated torsioning -- that is of the so-eluded-to sliding of the so-eluded-to translated Li-based Gaussian-associated eigenindices, that will here work to pull the here entering physical phenomenology of holonomic substrate, from the so-stated initial general given arbitrary eigenlocus, towards the then ensuing general given arbitrary eigenlocus.  Such a set of orbifold eigensets will here tend to be of a Real Reimmanian-based nature, as as structural unit, yet, it will bear an internal tense at the Poincare level, to those Gliosis-based eigenindices that are Yukawa to the holonomic substrate-based eigenstates -- that are of the semi-anuulus-based Fourier-associated motion, that is of the torsioning of the sliding of the earlier mentioned Li-based Gaussian eigenindices, that act here in so as to propagate the here entering phenomenology via a cross-product-based manner, from one specific general spot to another -- that is, instead, of a tendency of being of purely a Njenhuis-based nature.  This tendency is due to the incorporation of the Fourier-based operation of the directly corresponding kinematic activity, that is due to the Kunneth formulation that is to here be most associated with how the said given arbitrary respective worm-hole is to behave -- due to the incorporation of the functional basis of the so-stated two added sets of complex roots than that of a p-field, that are to here exist per each quantum of eigenpulsation, that works to come together in so as to work to form the overall general functioning of the said respective given arbitrary worm-hole of such a case.  To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Eight Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

A worm-hole works to bear a set of orbifold eigensets, that differentiate in a Fourier-based manner in so  as to being a group-associated metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian operator -- in so as to act, as well, as one overall Hamiltonian operand -- that behaves as one overall general genus of what may here be considered as the equivalece of a field-based transmitter, that also works to pull those phenomenology of a holonomic substrate that are to initially enter the depth of the semi-anuulus-based region of the said worm-hole, through a controrsioning or in other words throgh a bending of space-time-fabric, that works to translate the so-eluded-to Gaussian indices of the said entering holonomic substrate, in a kinematic manner, that pulls these said individually taken spaces through a mappable Lagrangian-based path, in a kinematic manner, into what would here tend to end-up being a completely different spatial region as to the destination-based volumed region where the so-stated holonomic substrate of entry is to end-up exiting the said worm-hole at.  This happens, in so as to make a projection of a Njenhuis tense of a Doubolt cohomological-based mappable tracing -- as to the physical mapping of the trace of one entity that is to then be transferred from one physical locality to another -- to happen, via what would mainly be due to the Fourier-based differentiation of a Minkowski-based bending of space, that is to here convey a directly corresponding Gaussian set of physical indices that are to here be translated from one spot to another -- in what would tend to be a difference of the equivalence of practically zero terrestrial-based time.  The spatial complexity of the Njenhuis tensorism of such a spatial contorsioning, would tend to involve two more sets of complex roots per eigenpulse of the self-same given arbitrary worm-hole, than the Real Reimmanian-based translation for a p-field would otherwise tend to bear, when this is taken under its directly corresponding Ward-Caucy-based conditions (this being that of the respective given worm-hole) -- which would here tend to make such a general state of a worm-hole to act as the equivalence of a heuristically majorized Hilbert Space.  To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

The Next Part Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

When it comes to the presence of a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- as the given arbitrary string wobbles here slightly from its initial relative Njenhuis-norm-to-holomorphic positional side to its relative Njenhuis-norm-to-reverse-holomorphic positional side, during a respective iteration of BRST, it will as well have a tendency of bearing a smooth-curved and semi-sinusoidal topological sway -- that is perturbated from an initial disturbance of space that is drawn into the holomorphic direction in such a manner that is positional-wise towards its counterpart, in so as to then be perturbated from a disturbance of space that is drawn into the relative reverse-holomorphic direction in such a manner that is positional-wise away from its counterpart.  As what I have just mentioned is happening -- the directly corresponding counterpart of the said given arbitrary open-loop that acts here as a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity, will here bear a covariance -- that is both codeterminable and codifferentiable -- in so as to work to act in the sub-Fourier-based "direction," that happens in so as to bear the capacity of forming the conditions that are necessary, in so as to cause there to be a homeomorphic field that is to be formed during the directly respective iteration of BRST -- to where this field, of which is then to be formed here, is to then exist in a semi-Laplacian-based manner, in-between the so-stated superstring and its counterpart.  As all of this is happening -- the superstring of such a said case is to then be decompactifying to the inverse scalar amplitude, as to its directly associated Lorentz-Four-Contraction that is to be considered here.  Here -- the so-eluded-to Clifford Expansion that is to here happen to the directly corresponding light-cone-gauge eigenstate that is directly associated with the kinematic activity of a one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity,  is to then bear both Real Reimmanian and Njenhuis torsional indices, -- that are to then act upon the thence formed Schwinger-Indices of such a given respective case,  in so as to here work to help to form a tense of what works to comprise part of the delineatory eigenbase of the directly corresponding gravity-waves -- that are to here be propagated by the so-eluded-to activity of the so-stated light-cone-gauge eigenstates, that are of the said given arbitrary respective one-dimensional superstring that is of such a so-stated case
To Be Continued!  I will continue with the suspense later!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

An Aside To The Last Interim During Course 19

Any given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity, is of the nature of being -- during BRST -- as a relatively open strand, at the specific locus where it is iterating -- over the course of each individually taken discrete increment of group-related instanton.  For any unfrayed superstring of any nature -- there will always be what I term of as mini-stringular segmentation, that will here work to inter bind the respective superstring, with the fields of all of the other unfrayed superstrings that exist in the substringular, during the generally noticed sequential series of the iterations of group-related instanton.  One-Dimensional superstrings tend to act as the discrete quanta of energy permittivity for kinetic energy that is not directly corresponding to being that of electromagnetic energy.  Electromagnetic energy is comprised of photons -- and photons that are not frayed will always be, instead, of a bosonic, or, in other words, of a two-dimensional nature.  (Photons are always comprised of closed loops.)  One-Dimensional superstrings may be termed of as fermionic superstrings.  Fermionic superstrings are of an open-loop-based nature, during any individually taken iteration of instanton.  Fermionic superstrings are said to work to bear, what may be termed of as a fractional spin.  An open-loop-based structure does not tend to bear as much of a capacity of being able to work to bear a spin-orbital-based vibrational oscillation -- that would otherwise bear such a radial delineation of its internally-based eigenstates, in so as to harmonically gyrate, in so as to bear a homeomorphic flow with its immediately correlative counterpart.  This is why the holonomic substrate of one-dimensional superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, tend to bear a relatively annharmonic vibrational oscillation -- in so as to work to form a homeomorphic field in-between the so-stated superstrings of discrete energy permittivity with their correlative counterstrings, during any respective multiplicit given arbitrary iteration of BRST -- in which such a so-stated open-loop quantum of discrete energy permittivity is acting -- in so as to be of the said quanta of kinetic energy permittivity.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued! Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Another Interim In-Between Parts Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle Differentiation

When any two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity is undergoing an iteration of BRST, which is when both the Beti Action and the Polyakov Action are taking place -- the vibrational oscillation of the said given arbitrary respective so-eluded-to bosonic superstring, is to then be undergoing a sub-Fourier-based differentiation -- in which the directly corresponding superstring and its correlative counterstring are to then be radially vibrating back-and-forth during the so-stated iteration of BRST.  Such a semi-Laplacian-based topological sway, that is of the so-eluded-to genus of the vibrational oscillation of such a respective superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- will here tend to be of more of a spin-orbital-based nature than the genus of the vibrational oscillation that would instead tend to be exhibited by the sub-Fouriier-based differentiation of a respective given arbitrary one-dimensional or a fermionic superstring that is of discrete energy permittivity, during its respective genus of a semi-Laplacian-based activity -- that would tend to happen when such a one-dimensional superstring is to iterate during its correlative activity, that is to here be directly involved with an iteration of BRST.  This is in part the reason why the vibrational oscillation of a two-dimensional superstring during BRST will always tend to be of a harmonic topological sway during the directly associated sub-Fourier-based activity that would here be represented by the Calabi-based motion of a bosonic superstring -- during the main thrust of any respective given arbitrary iteration of the directly corresponding iterations of group-instanton, in which a bosonic superstring is iterating as a discrete quantum of energy permittivity.  This is  related to the condition that bosonic superstrings exhibit -- what may be termed in an individually taken manner, as a whole spin.  Next -- why fermioinic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity tend to vibrate in a enharmonic manner during BRST.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Sam Roach.

An Interim In-Between Parts Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

An orientable superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- is a superstring that works to bear a homeomorphic field that is to here exist in-between the said string and its directly corresponding counterstring, during any correlative iteration of BRST.  What makes such a superstring orientable, is that the overall average distance that is to exist in-between each individually taken first-ordered point particle that works to comprise the self-same superstring With each individually taken first-ordered point particle that works to comprise the directly associated counterstring that is eigen to the so-stated superstring -- to where the so-eluded-to counterstring is to exist at BRST in a Laplacian-based manner,  just to the relatively forward-holomorphic side of the said superstring of discrete energy permittivity that is being discussed in this case -- is to be of one given distance when one is dealing with two dimensional or bosonic superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, while such a given distance is to be of another scalar amplitude when one is dealing with, instead,  one-dimensional superstrings, or, in other words, when one is dealing with  ferminonic superstrings of discrete energy permititivty.  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

As To What The Grassman Constant Is

Any given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity, over the course of BRST -- is acommadated by the Laplacian-based existence of its directly corresponding counterstring.  The said respective superstring of discrete energy permittivity works to mainly act as the particle-based presence of discrete energy permittivity, while its directly corresponding counterstring works to mainly act as the wave-based presence of discrete energy permittivity.  During BRST and/or during the Regge Action -- the respective superstring and its directly correlative counterstring are to work to bear a homeomorphic field, or else the said respective superstring will ensue to not be orientable.  The constant that works to bear any respective superstring of discrete energy permittivity, to act in a Laplacian-based nature in so as to then have the condition of obtaining a homeomorphic field -- when in terms of that field that is formed in-between the said respective superstring and its directly corresponding counterstring -- may be thought of as the Grassman Constant.  When the Grassman Constant is not maintained in both the Beti Action eigenstate of one given arbitrary respective iteration of BRST -- and in the directly ensuing Regge Action eigenstate that is of the self-same given arbitrary respective iteration of BRST, then, the superstring will immediately tend to ensue in so as to temporarily alter from working to be of a Noether-based flow.  This is because, when the Grassman Constant is not maintained during both the Beti Action and its directly correlative Regge action -- the superstring is then said to not be of an orientable nature.  A superstring that is not of a Noether-based flow is not orientable, and will then tend to temporarily be of a tachyonic nature.  Therefore, a superstring that is said to not bear the Grassman  Constant over both the course of a respective eigenstate of the Beti Action as well as during the ensuing iteration of the directly associated Regge Action eigenstate, in so as to make the directly correlative discrete quantum of energy to not be orientable, then, that self-same superstring of discrete energy permittivity is to then tend to temporarily become of a tachyonic nature.
To Be Continued!  Samuel David Roach.

Part Six Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

Any given arbitrary worm-hole works to bear a Laplacian-based Grassman Constant -- that is both of a Njenhuis and of an unorientable nature.  The Laplacian-based condition -- that the Grassman Constant of a worm-hole is of a Njenhuis nature, is due to the physical quality that a worm-hole is the equivalent of the annulus of a bending and of a warping, of what was an initially Real Reimmanian space. The Laplacian-based condition -- that the Grassman Constant of a worm-hole is of an unorientable nature, is due to the physical quality, that a worm-hole is of the same general genus of space-time-based fabric as substringular phenomenology that is of a tachyonic-based nature.  This is true, even though a vast majority of the added velocity that any respctive worm-hole works to bring to any physical entity that is to be accelerated to go "faster than light," actually tends to be due to what is here to be just due to the so-stated condition of the fact that a worm-hole is a contorsioning or in other words of a bending of space-time-fabric -- that works to pull space-time-fabric into a further scalar locality of space, even if the actual speed that an entity itself that is pulled through such a said worm-hole, is not even moving close to light speed.  A worm-hole's speed actually tends to be basically due to the condition that the directly appertaining space-time-fabric that is of the said worm-hole -- is what is moving "faster than light," and not the respective holonomic substrate that is transported through it to be being transported "faster than light."  Yet, unorientable superstrings do always tend to become spontaneously tachyonic -- once these work to neither bear an orientable Grassman Constant during both the directly corresponding Beti Action and the directly corresponding Regge Action.  This is due to the condition that such a so-stated unorientable superstring is to here be temporarily altered -- from working to bear an initially  Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology into then working to bear instead a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology.  This is due to the condition that a mass that works to bear a Kaluza-Klein topology, would need to bear an infinite fractal modulus in order for it to actually go at the speed or light or faster -- to where it would then need to bear all of the mass of the Continuum.  Yet, if one were to cause the so-eluded-to and temporary alteration of the light-cone-gauge of a mass-bearing superstring of discrete energy permittivity -- to alter into then work to bearing instead a Yang-Mills or in other words a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology, then, such a mass-bearing phenomenology can indeed go at the speed of light or faster.  Such an alteration of the correlative light-cone-gauge topology, is what will always tend to occur -- when the directly corresponding superstring is unorientable during both its directly corresponding Beti Action and its correlative Regge Action.  This is when a superstring will actually become tachyonic. I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Five Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

When taken along the topological surface of any given arbitrary second ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate, that is of a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology -- the directly corresponding holonomic substrate of the Laplacian-based condition of the so-stated topological surface, that is pertinent in this respective case, is of a sinusoidal nature and Not of a supplemental-based nature, during the correlative individually taken durations of BRST that are to here be directly related to the so-eluded-to iterations of group-related instanton, by which any respective given arbitrary Yang-Mills or non abelien light-cone-gauge topology is to be interactive, when upon its Gliosis-based environment in the substringular.  This is to where, to an extent, one may say that the tendency of any respective given arbitrary non abelien or Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology, is to be of more of a smooth-curved nature than that of an otherwise jointal-based nature -- over the course of each individually taken iteration of BRST, that is to here be directly related to each of the correlative individually taken iterations of the directly pertinent sequential series of group-related instanton.  This will here work to indicate that the Laplacian-based nature of a Yang-Mills or a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology, will tend to have a relatively higher scalar amplitude of working to bear a relatively stronger elastic modulae over time -- than that of a directly comparitive Kaluza-Klein or an abelien light-cone-gauge topology -- while the Laplacian-based nature of a Kaluza-Klein or an abelian light-cone-gauge topology, will tend to have a relatively higher scalar amplitude of working to bear a relatively stronger fractal modulae over time, than that of a directly comparitive Yang-Mills or a non abelien light-cone-gauge topology.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Four Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

An initially conformally invariant substringular Calabi-Yau manifold that is initially Yau-Exact, that had just worked to bear a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology, that is to then be converted through a superstringular perturbation, into a tense of a manifold that works to instead bear a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology -- will not tend to ensue to bear a Noether-based flow, over the immediate transient translation of the so-eluded-to said Calabi-Yau manifold -- over a set and relatively brief sequential series of iterations of group-related instanton, by which the so-stated respective given arbitrary manifold is to then be delineated -- in what will here tend to be a relatively transient duration, by which the so-eluded-to mass-bearing orbifold eigenset will then be briefly translated from the said Noether-based flow, into what will here be an ensuing tachyonic-based flow.  This respective given arbitrary substringular condition is here, in part, the case of as to what would then tend to happen in such a case, on account of the Ward-Caucy condition that such a so-formed Yang-Mills topology works to form a Gaussian-based eigenbase -- in which such a respective codifferentiable tense of norm-based conditions, that such a just formed Yang-Mills topology will then be put into play in such a general tense of such a substringular Fourier-based situation,will happen to where the resultant of such a perturbative effect upon the initially said Calabi-Yau manifold, will then tend to form such a change upon the wave-tug/wave-pull, that is to be delineated upon the discrete energy quanta that is to change in such a general manner -- by which the directly corresponding alteration of a mass-bearing manifold will then go in the direction in so as to go from bearing an abelian light-cone-gauge topology into instead bearing a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology, to where this will then tend to cause both the correlative Bette Action and the correlative Regge Action that is to happen to those superstinrgs, that will have here worked to comprise the construction of the said substringular manifold of such a case, to consequently not work to bear a homeomorphic core-field-density that would otherwise exist in-between the correlative superstrings and their counterparts.  When the field that exists between any given arbitrary superstring and its respective given arbitrary counterpart, does not work to form a homeomorphic core-field-density -- during both the correlative Bette Action and the ensuing Regge Action, during any respective given arbitrary iteration of group-related instanton -- the superstring is then said to be non-orientable during both the respective Bette Action and the correlative respective Regge Action.  When any respective superstring is not orientable during both a correlative Bette Action and its directly corresponding Regge Action, during any respective given arbitrary iteration of group-related instanton, such a superstring will then follow to result in then becoming tachyonic.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Free-Will

To My Readers: Free Will is an interaction, that acts as a cognitive integration of a tendency of going from an initial thought-based rumamging, that is among the metaphorical choices that one has initially perceived of -- in such a manner that may be compared with a robot working to thumb through its possible decisions in a "Van Der Walls"-based manner -- until that choice that the so-eluded-to thinking organism works to determine to be most reliable -- is then converged upon, to where the utilization of that given arbitrary decision is to then be implemented upon the venue of its directly correlative life-based activities over time. Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Three Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

The condition that any mini-stringular Laplacian-based networking -- of what may be termed of as the mappable tracing of zero-norm-state-projections, often works to form a general condition of a Njenhuis state of substringular tension -- that is to be delineated here among the holonomic substrate of that mini-stringular segmentation, by which the Fourier-based activity of the so-stated Njenhuis tensors are to here be interactive upon certain other respective given arbitrary indices of the field-density of that homotopic residue, -- that is to here be external to the core-field-density of certain given arbitrary superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, that are to here be of a Yukawa-based nature, in a covariant manner, to the general tense of the interdependent Ward-Caucy-based conditions of the so-stated holonomic substrate of the extostential field divergence, that is of the said given arbitrary state of the so-stated zero-norm-projections of such a respective case, -- may often work upon the holonomic substrate of the directly corresponding superstrings of discrete energy permittivity that I have eluded--to in this said general codeterminable and codifferentiable sub-Fourier-based Ward-Caucy state, of what is to here be one relatively transient kinematic inter-relation of mini-stringular segementation with discrete energy, to come into the spontaneous need for the implementation of the interaction of the proximal local holonomic substrate of a respective given Higgs Boson to be brought into the so-eluded-to local substringular neighborhood, in so as to bring the Gliosis-based implementation of the Kahler-Metric upon the core-field-density of those substringular eigenmembers of which are to here be brought into what is here to be the Gliosis-based interaction of the directly associated quanta of discrete energy with the proximal localized Klein Bottle eigenstate, that is to here be brought into the said local substringular arena, in so as to bring into play those superstringular changes that are needed -- in order for there to be both the continuation and the perpetual interaction of certain discrete energy quanta among other discrete energy quanta, -- in order for energy to both persist and exist.
I will continue with the suspense later!  To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.

Part Two Of Session 12 Of Course 19 -- The Klein Bottle And Orbifold Differentiation

As is often the case -- the Gaussian Ward-based conditions of a Yang-Mills-based light-cone-gauge topology may have a habbit of being both antiholomrphic and orphoganal to the Gaussian Ward-based conditions of an adjacent Kaluza-Klein-based light-cone-gauge topology, from within the holononmic substrate of many substringular phenomenology that are to here consist of both orbifolds that are respectively of a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology as well as orbifolds that are of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  For instance, let us take a metaphorical look at the composition of an electron, when this may be taken in a Laplacian-based manner of extrapolation.  The mass-bearing superstrings of an electron, such as is the case for any Noether-based mass-bearing superstrings, are of a Kaluza-Klein or of an abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  The Noether-based superstrings of an electron that are purely of a tense of kinetic energy, such as is the case for any superstrings that are purely of a tense of kinetic energy from within the framework of the Ward-Caucy-based constraints of any substringular case scenario -- are of a Yang-Mills or of a non abelian light-cone-gauge topology.  The orbifolds of an electron that are of a mass-bearing nature, work to bear a Gaussian tense that is both antiholomorphic and orphoganal to the Gaussian tense of those orbifolds of an electron, that are purely of a kinetic energy-based nature.  The resultant tendency of a lack of both mini-stringular tension and the lack of both elastic and fractal-based torsion -- that often exists among the substringular eigenmembers that are of a Yang-Mills light-cone-gauge topology -- may often tend to produce a lack of entropy in the framework of the respective orbifold eigenset, of which may often here work to allow for less of a need for what would otherwise be the imminent need for the Kahler-Metric to be interactive among the substringular eigenmembers, that are of the directly correlative substringular region of such a case.  This occasional tendency may often tend to cause a lack of the so-eluded-to imminent substringular local region, that is proximal localized with such a Laplacian-based locus -- to then bear less of a need for the utilization of the holonomic substrate of the correlative Klein Bottle eigenstate with the proxmal localized manifold, that is of the so-eluded-to orbifold eigenset of such a case, that is here of a Yang--Mills light-cone-gauge topology.  I will continue with the suspense later! To Be Continued!
Sincerely, Sam Roach.

Time Moving Forward And Backward At The Same Time

I estimate that there are 473,364*10^(55) genre of instanton, that each tend to happen over the course of each successive iteration of group-related instanton that we are aware of.  This is in part due to the condition, that the rate of group-related instanton has potentially slowed, over time.  As I have stated before, there are 91*10^*81 universes in each set of parallel universes.  Also, as I have said before, there is an initial tendency of there being a maximum of 159,000 layers of reality -- in each set of parallel universes.  Time moves forward and backward at the same time.  Yet, in the course of one individually taken given arbitrary universe, anything that is cognitively imbued in the collective consciousness of history can not change, from within the multiplicit bounds of the respective said given arbitrary universe.  Yet, things that are not as imbued upon the collective consciousness, may occasionally change -- over the course of what I describe of as a Major Reality Change.  A Major Reality Change is when part of the immediately previous predominant layer of reality is changed, in the course of there being a respective given arbitrary change of 1 ten thousandth of history.  This means, that each layer of reality of each individually taken universe of any of the three individually taken sets of parallel universes -- over the course of the sequential series of instantons, as to the composition and the orchestration of the interaction of time with discrete energy quanta -- has an average of having all of the 473,364*10^(55) genre of instantons -- in a way that involves a variety of 3,056,632,951*10^18 manners of the procedure of as to the consequent flow of the directly associated Fourier-based transformations, that ensue in so as to form the resultant potential variety of the delineations of the kinematic flow of energy over "time."

More As To The Poisson Integral

Let us consider the Laplacian-based condition of two different adjacent waves, that bear a common holomorphicity, that work to bear an integration of their phase exchange -- in so as to make a mappable tracing of their resultant cohomology to be of an equivalent nature.  This form of integration is known of, in general, as the Poisson Integral.  This is in so as to be able to make an extrapolation of as to how two of such given arbitrary adjacent waves may be made equivalent to one another, in a Laplacian-based manner.  Next, let us now consider two different Njenhuis adjacent waves, that bear a common holomorphicity -- in so as to make the resultant cohomological-based mappable tracing, that would here be subtended between the two said waves of an equal manner -- by making an Imaginary-based numerical integration of their phase exchanges, in a respective given arbitrary manner, that would work here in so as to make the two wave-based spaces that are initially Njenhuis to one another, to be made into a Gaussian-based nature to one another -- by using a method  of undetermined complex roots, in the process of applying the appropriate Li-based integrand, that would then here relate two spaces that are initially not of a Real Reimmanian-based nature to one another, to made of a viable nature to one another, by then applying the so-eluded-to Li-based codifferentiable indices.  If the two so-eluded-to waves are of the same orbifold eigenset, in the process of the Fourier-based translation of the two so-eluded-to spaces, being transformed through the respective Lagrangian-based path -- by which the two metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian-based operators are moving along, via their correlative Hamiltonian operands, then, the result will be that the two said waves will here tend to be of a Yukawa-based Ward-Caucy-based nature -- when one is to here compare the one Hamiltonian-based operator to the other.  Yet, if the two said waves of such a case are, instead, of two different orbifold eigensets -- then, in the process of the Fourier-based translation of the two so-eluded-to spaces being transformed through the Lagrangian-based path, by which the two metrical-gauge-based Hamiltonian-based operators are to then be moving along, via their correlative Hamiltonian operands, then, the result will be that the two said waves will here tend to not be of a Yukawa-based Ward-Caucy-based nature -- when one is to here compare the one Hamiltonian-based operator to the other.  I will continue with the suspense later!
To Be Continued!  Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.