Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are individually connected to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity. Couterstrings are individually connected, in the relatively reverse-holomorphic direction, to superstrings of discrete energy permittivity. A Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate is individually connected holomorphically to one of the so-stated superstrings of discrete energy permittivity, while the said given arbitrary superstring is connected holomorphically to one individual substringular counterpart of discrete energy permittivity. Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates are connected to superstrings homotopically via a topological mechanism that is known of as the light-cone-gauge. Any given arbitrary one-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permttivity bears five second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that work to form what may be termed of as one first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate of a fermionic genus. Any given arbitrary two-dimensional superstring of discrete energy permittivity bears ten second-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstates that work to form what may be termed of as one first-ordered light-cone-gauge eigenstate of a bosonic genus. Any given arbitrary Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate that is not tachyonic moves either radially one Planck-Radii and/or one Planck-Length per iteration of group instanton -- as is according to Noether Flow. Likewise, any given arbitrary superstring of discrete energy permittivity that is not tachyonic moves either radially one Planck-Radii and/or one Planck-Length per iteration of group instanton -- as is according to Noether Flow. Also, any given arbitrary counterpart of a superstring of discrete energy permittivity that is not tachyonic moves either radially one Planck-Radii and/or one Planck-Length per iteration of group instanton -- as is according to Noether Flow. The motion of Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates -- as these said states move kinematically over a sequential series of instantons -- tends to bear a trivially isometric chirality with the motion of superstrings of discrete energy permittivity -- as these said states move kinematically over a sequential series of instantons. Likewise, the motion of superstrings -- as these said discrete units of energy permittivity move kinematically over a sequential series of instantons -- tends to bear a trivially isomorphic chirality with the motion of their directly corresponding substringular counterparts. So, if any given arbitrary superstring moves via its progressive iteration, in what may be here thought of as an arbitrary holomorphic direction in a given arbitrary directoralized Lagrangian, then, both the directly corresponding Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstate and the directly corresponding substringular counterpart will move in the same genus of the eluded to arbitrary holomorphic direction -- in the so-stated given arbitrary directoralized Lagrangian. What I have just stated does not include what I have discussed before as both the relativistic wobbling tendencies that Fadeev-Popov-Trace eigenstates bear, the relativistic wobbling tendencies that superstrings bear, and, the relativistic wobbling tendencies that the counterstrings of the said superstrings bear -- per iteration of group instanton in which the substringular works to form that sequential series of kinematic motion that works to form the energy that makes up the universe. Next -- as to why superstrings of mass can not go at the speeds of light, when such superstrings bear a Kaluza-Klein light-cone-gauge topology ( an abelian topology). I will continue with the suspense later!
Sincerely, Samuel David Roach.
No comments:
Post a Comment