A Little About Singularities That I Feel Like Mentioning

Well hello again world, this is Sam Roach here!  How are you doing?!
Do you remember when I had mentioned that a hermitian curvature -- whether one is talking about a Laplacian setting that reffers to a "snapshot" of duration, or whether one is talking about a Fourier setting in which a curvature is developing over a sequential series of instantons -- is a curvature in which all of the derivatives equal to the number of dimensions that a given phenomena is present in are smoothly tranlated either thru a mapping of the tracing of the curvature for a Laplacian setting or thru a developmental mapping of the curvature that is traced over a duration of a sequential series of instantons?!  Well, here is a simple idea that will be an epitheny to you when you hear it: 
When a substringular curvature is translated either purely pictorially or via a kinematically mapped redistribution that is studied over a timewise delineation, if you go from one part of the curvature to another in the course of a relatively tight locus -- and there is a location in-between where there is a singularity (in so that the limits of the integration that describe the translation of the given curve thru space do not exist), then, the locus that I had just arbitrarily described may be considered to have a Chern-Simmons singularity.  If the prior mentioned limits of integration may only be described with imaginary numbers that are within the degrees of freedom that exist in terms of the number of dimensions that are associating with the either timeless or timewise translation of the given curvature through space, then, one may still determine that the curvature is Ward hermitian in accordance with the Ward Caucy bounds of that given subspace.
Now, if a given curvature bears three or more dimensions of the prior type of singularity in terms of three or more derivatives that bear limits that do not exist in-between to loci that are relatively neighboring in a tight locus of subspace, then, the inter-relationship between the two eigenloci mentioned is considerd to be spurious for even p-fields.
Spurious cusps where there is such a perturbation in the delineation of singularities over a relatively small locus of field translation always only allow for a purely Chern-Simmons redistribution in the field that interconnects the eigenfields that I was describing.  Such purely Chern-Simmons boundary conditions, since these are spurious by forming a trilateral cusp, are never spontaneously partially hermitian until there is a Gliossi perturbation that alters the described arbitrarily tight locus where the associated critical cusp is localized at.  Such Chern-Simmons conditions that I mentioned before form a non-trivially assymetric abelian geometric substringular field  that will just about alway only have a chance to be altered by either a Campbell Projection, a Hausendorf Projection, or, a Campbell- Hausendorf Projection.  I will continue with the suspense later!  Until then, have a wonderfull day, and please pray for world peace.  Sincerely, Sam.