A Clarification, In Lieu Of The Grassman Constant

 The Grassman Constant, is a universal constant in physics. Superstrings tend to behave in such a manner, to where these appear to "want" to maintain the Grassman Constant, by keeping a Noether-Based Flow, by retaining a relatively orientable nature, when this is here to be taken, in terms of their general Ward-Cauchy-Related behavior. In the process of a superstring maintaining a sense or oientability, by my particular model of string theory, the field that is here to be latent in covariance, between the said superstring and its counter string, is to be of a heuristically homeomorphic nature. When this is to occur, the implicit discrete quantum of energy in question, is to remain of a Noether-Related nature, to where it will thereby spontaneously continue to move in a heuristically relativistic manner. This is to happen, when the eminently corroborative general tense of Betti Action involved here, is to work to involve either an even Imaginary ordering, when going into the eminently implicitly involved increment of BRST AND/Or when the eminently corroborative general tense of Betti Action involved here, is to work to involve an even Imaginary ordering, when going into the eminently implicitly involved increment of an ensuing Regge Action. If the Betti number involving the Betti Action, over the course of both of the two implicit incremental duration-related processes, is to only be odd, then, the eminently corroborative field that is latent in covariance, between the here involved super string and its directly associated counter string, may not be homeomorphic, if such a superstring is to spontaneously remain of a Noether-Based flow, to where the Grassman Constant is not able to be maintained, IF the superstring is here to spontaneously remain of a Noether-Based nature. Yet; The Grassman Constant is a Universal Constant, so it WANTS to be maintained. So; What happens, is that, instead of the said involved superstring remaining Noether-Based, it will then ensue, in so as to spontaneously become tachyonic, instead. So, Yes, the Grassman Constant is always to tend to be maintained, yet, if the Ward-Cauchy-Related Field is to threaten otherwise, the directly related discrete quantum or quanta of energy, will consequently spontaneously go, from being of a Noether-Based nature, to then subsequently becoming, instead, of an eminent taciyonic-related nature. 

Part 1; How The Stated Trinomial Eigenstates Apply

 Grand Unified Field Theory: (See the post, Enhancement Of The Kahler-Metric, from March of 2023).

Introductory Explanation:

What The given arbitrary equation, of which utilizes, what I term of as being, trinomial eigenstates, is to be acting to describe, Are the attributes of physical nature, of a given region in time and space, as heuristically contingent, upon its environment. 

For any region of Stoke’s-Based field, in which 1<N<= 26; ( where N is an integer) — To where this is to be the case, for the mathematical situation of SERIES, that I have provided; (Yet; When in lieu of, as to what the “knot” of trinomial eigenstates happens to be, for that particular region, (that is, when working to determine the knot of trinomial eigenstate), the value of N, refers to a Cotangent Bundle, that will be anywhere from 3 to 96 (since this utilizes Chern Simons Theory)). Furthermore; Although, as everyone in math tends to know, in Euclidean use, the natural log of one is zero; Yet, with a Cartesian utilization of mathematics, the natural log of one may often tend to be 2PIin. When the eluded potential application of such a case is to occur, small n is to be simply 1.  So, depending upon where in the “ equation “ you are looking at, N may be anywhere from 2 to 26; N may be anywhere from 3 to 96; Or, N may be simply 1. In the “knotting equation “ of trinomial eigenstate, N is a single integer per layering, that is anywhere from 3 to 96. In the potential Cartesian case, where there is no viably present Planck Energy, small n is one. Whereas; In the summation (series),that is in the math that I did, N is recursively altered, from equaling one to equaling anywhere from 2 to 26 — depending upon the pertinent magnitude of Stoke’s-Based spatial dimensionality. So: Each centralized knot, (of which is eluded to, with the idea, as to the mentioned implicit trinomial eigenstates), is delineated in a twined configuration, that is anywhere from 3 to 96 spatial dimensional. The Stoke’s -based region itself, per potentially layered region, is comprised, in anywhere, from 2 to 26 spatial dimensions plus time. And the Cartesian implicit idea that I have eluded to earlier, is here to be considered, in a heuristically reductional case, in which small n is 1. I hope that this is clear now! If not, please ask any pertinent questions!

Use the hereupon Grand Unified Field Theory Equation, to determine, with at least some sort of viable expectation value, what the corroborative holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric, is to be expressed of as. I just Started to indicate how the eminently corroborative equation in consideration is to be utilized. I will continue with this explanation, a little bit more, in a future encounter. Till next time, Later! SAM ROACH from PINCKNEY MICHIGAN!

Hello.  I’m back! 

To get back to what I was saying about the attempted grand unified field theory equation:

There are 112 reductional “gamma knot of the field” general tenses to consider — simply for cotangent bundle R(sub N) alone, to consider. Depending upon the eminently associated Stoke’s-Based region, that one may have involved in such an implicit situation, one may often thereby, be potentially put into a situation, in which one is to find a resultant R(sub N), that can be formed, or formulated, by finding an intersection of such reductional fields. The more of a selection of co-deterministic interdependently interactive fields that are to be hereby considered, as being or acting upon the given arbitrary focused upon region, the greater that the expectation value is to consequently tend to be, as to what the determined holonomic substrate is to be tabulated as. Understanding what the holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric is to be, for a given arbitrary region in time and space, with a relatively high expectation value, may often work to help facilitate an increased knowledge, as to how such an implicit place in time and space is to behave. One is thereby, to have the viable potential, of any possible combination of the 112 implied "gamma knot of the field" trinomial eigenstate-related templates, when in conjunction with the viable potential, of any possible combination of regions, that may be tantamount to working to involve anywhere from 2 to 26 spatial dimensions plus time, when in conjunction, with the viable potential, of working to consider, any of the shapes and energy-related magnitudes, that may here to eminently corroborative, with the multiplicity of the general multi-considerate Stoke's-Based field of this.

In theory, if one were to consider a very large number of such co-deterministic interdependently interactive fields, one could potentially have a spontaneously immense predicated knowledge, of the viably possible behavior, that one could respectively gander to surmise, within reason, as to a relatively educated guess, as to how the region and its component parts, is relatively likely to act, in such a case.

I will continue with a furthered explanation, LATER!!! (Such as a set of pictures, showing 56 pairs of my 112 reductional "gamma knot of the field" general tendencies, for cotangent bundle R(sub N), when in terms of, here, the trinomial eigenstates, of which are here to be determined, to help to be able to solve, in lieu of the "equation" that I have provided, in, "Enhancement Of The Kahler-Metric," in so as to be able to facilitate the general process, of having the capability, of working to refine a knowledge, as to what the holonomic substrate of localized covariant space-time-fabric is to be, for any Stoke's-Based region in time and space.)

Sincerely, Sam Roach!

Generation Of Pure Kinetic Energy

 When a tense of inverse inertial electrodynamic pressure, is to eminently interact with a tense, of what I call the "Raffey" Coupling, this may often tend to work to produce the general tense, of a spontaneous resultant incursion, of pure kinetic energy. NOW, I WILL BASICALLY EDIT AND ADD TO MY CURRENT POSTS, TO WHERE THIS IS WHAT THE CONTINUED SUSPENSE WILL NOW BE! SINCERELY, SAMUEL DAVID ROACH. 

“WE SHARE THE SAME BIOLOGY, REGARDLESS OF IDEOLOGY; SO WHAT MAY SAVE US ME AND YOU, IS IF THE RUSSIANS LOVE THEIR CHILDREN TOO.” — Sting

Also; Here is an aside:

Let us consider a kinematically moving Noether-Based mass-bearing Hamiltonian Operator. 

The product of the square of its i*PI(del) Action, with Time, as taken per the inertia that such a said Hamiltonian Operator is here to work to express, may be said to work to exhibit, a tense of charge generation. Whereas; The  quotient of the holonomy of such a stated kinematically moving Noether-Based mass-bearing Hamiltonian Operator, (with) per squared charge, may be said to work to exhibit, a tense of charge degeneration. 

When one is to take the product, of charge degeneration , with amperage, one may eminently result, in working to determine, the workings, of a tangential flow of entropic kinetic energy. 

When the angular momentum of an initially hermitian spatially propagated Kahler Manifold, is to work to bear a viable perturbation in its directional gauging, this may often work to cause the initially inferred De Rham cohomology, to alter into a tense of a Dolbeault cohomology.  

A spinning diffeomorphic Kahler Manifold, will often tend to generate a more harmonic tense of charge, than an otherwise analogous spinning Kahler Manifold, that is not diffeomorphic.  

The eminent physical application of anti gravity, as incurred upon a spinning Kahler Manifold, may often tend to spontaneously facilitate, a continuous flow of a directly associated viable charge emission.  

When generative anti gravity is to be escalated in its incursion, upon a given arbitrary Hamiltonian Operator, of which is here, in this particular case, to act as a Kahler Manifold, this general operation, may often tend to work to accelerate the earlier stated Hamiltonian Operator, of such a respective case.

The Polyakov Action may often tend to operate differently, when under the spontaneous proximal local influence of anti gravity, than when under the spontaneous proximal local influence of heuristic gravity.  

The general process, in which the topological manifold of a cohomology-based structure is unfurled, may often tend to work to involve, the likings of a p-Adic cohomology. 

Co-Tangentially delineated charge, may often tend to be facilitated, by the proximal local presence, of the Kahler-Metric.  

The incursion of anti gravity, upon a moving Kahler Manifold, often tends to decrease the physical impedance, due to friction, that would otherwise tend to be imparted, upon the kinetic operation, of the earlier stated Kahler Manifold.  

When a Noether-Based Kahler Manifold is heuristic, its eminently associated gravitational topological variance will tend to be reductional.  

When the Ricci Curvature, of an initially heuristic gravitational wave, that is to spontaneously alter into an anti gravitational wave, is to occur, it will consequently tend to follow, that the distributional delineation of its projected trajectory, is often to tend to invert, from working to express a Euclidean distributional delineation, to then working to express a hyperbolic distributional delineation.  

The Fourier-Related-Progression, of that general superstring-related deformation of space-time-fabric, that may be respectively ascertained, by considering the general mathematical workings, of the kinematically translated process, in which the conformally invariant, proximal local, kinetically transferred tense, of a topological manifold, which may be perceived of, as working to express the general physical attribute, of a symplectic geometry, may often tend to be described of, as being eminently involved in its respective gauged operation, as being a given arbitrary field-based Hamiltonian substrate, of light-cone-gauge-related topological phenomenological residue, in which a Minkowski Space, is here to be mathematically altered into a Hilbert Space. However; The Fourier-Related-Progression, of that general superstring-related deformation of space-time-fabric, that may be respectively ascertained, by considering the general mathematical workings, of the kinematically translated process, in which the conformally invariant, proximal local, kinetically transferred tense, of a topological manifold, which may be perceived of, as working to express the general physical attribute, of a Khovanov geometry, may often tend to be perceived of, as working to express the general physical attribute, of a gauged-operation, as being a given arbitrary field-based Hamiltonian substrate, of light-cone-gauge-related phenomenological residue, in which a Hilbert Space, is here to be mathematically altered into a Minkowski Space. 

The spontaneous proximal local presence of inverted heuristic unitary thought-frequency, is eminently related to the spontaneous proximal local presence of heuristic unitary pulse. 

When a Kahler Manifold is initially moving in an anti gravitational environment, its angular drive in a direction, tends to become more abelian, while its impeding restraint, tends to become more non abelian, to where this just inferred general physical tendency, may often work to allow, for freer motion of the said Kahler Manifold, to where there is thence to be both an attenuated entropic inhibition, as well as an attenuated potential risk, of the proximal local incursion of g forces/reverse g forces, to where the potential spontaneous incursion, of an immediate change, in the direction of such a said Kahler Manifold, will thereby often tend to bear a lowered physical impact, upon the internal reference-frame, of the topological manifold, of such an inferred Hamiltonian Operator, of which is here to behave, as a Kahler Manifold.  

The stronger that the pulse, which is of a kinetically delineated Noether-Based mass-bearing Hamiltonian Operator, is to be, the more deeply embedded, that the eminently associated cohomology-related cochain-like eigenstates, will often consequently tend to be.  

Take the mass of a reductional neutrino times the square of its frequency. Cube this whole thing. Consider this to be in terms of “joules seconds.” This ought to basically be equivocal to, the “quantum”of zero-point-energy. Next; divide this by the Planck Constant. This should roughly be tantamount, to the fraction of discrete energy, that zero-point-energy is “equivocal” to. (Sorry for the typo earlier

The projected trajectory, of a harmonically transferred Kahler Hamiltonian Operator, will often tend to form, a smooth cohomology-related topological structure.  

Electrodynamic charge, may often tend to be facilitated into its generative existence, by the physical coupling that is to be present, between the Majorana-Weyl-Invariant-Mode, and, the recursively altering planar area, that it is to be eminently acting upon.  

The more succinct that the i*PI(Del) Action is to be, for a given arbitrary Noether-Based mass-bearing compact Kahler Hamiltonian Operator, that is here to be generating a viable net tense, of harmonic cohomology-related holonomic eigenstates, the more hermitian that the delineation of charge will often tend to be, for the implicit team, of mass-bearing discrete energy eigenstates.  

Neutrinos work to bear, a basically imperceptibly small frequency, of about 2.6741 nanohertz. So; the operational duration that it takes, for such a minute phenomenon of mass-bearing eigenstate, just to accomplish the kinematic flow of one of its wavelengths, takes a whopping 11.85 years to complete. Yet; an eminent physical advantage that is present, in the proximal general attribute, of such a tiny mass-bearing phenomenon, working to express/exhibit such a tiny respective frequency, is, that this general physical condition, may often work, to enhance the isotropic stability, of its interdependently covariant gauge-action, when in retrospect to the spontaneous covariant motion, of other tiny composite increments of physical phenomenology, thereby working to facilitate, the multiplicity of kinematically delineated neutrinos, to be optimum, at potentially working to help encode, for the various general forces of nature. It does this, in general, by working to facilitate gauge-bosons, to more effectively interact with the implicit eminently associated light-cone-gauge eigenstates, in such a general manner, in so as to form various oscillations across the Rarita Structure, of which, in turn, work to help induce the eminently related “instigations” in phenomenology, that are most apt, at being able and capable, of working to help form, the reductional forces of physical nature.  

A Kahler Hamiltonian Operator, that works to bear a recursive tense of conformal invariant pulse, will tend to spontaneously work to bear, a steady-state delineation, in terms of the projected trajectory, of its eminently associated Fourier-Related-Progression.  

When the universal ratio of matter versus anti matter, is to be viably increased, this may often have the general tendency, of working to escalate the multiplicity, of the net universal frequency, that is here to be exhibited, by the composite Fourier-Related-Progression, that is here to be eminently associated, with the hereupon adherent spatial translation, of the net universal flow, of the herein proximal local phenomenology, that is to operate, in so as to make its viably optimum adjustment, to the multiplicity of the general implicit perturbation, that is here to be implied, by such an increase of matter versus anti matter.  Whereas; When the universal ratio of anti matter versus matter, is to be viably increased, this may often have the general tendency, of working to escalate the multiplicity, of the net universal time-bearing, that is here to be exhibited, by the composite Fourier-Related-Progression, that is here to be eminently associated, with the hereupon adherent spatial translation, of the net universal flow, of the herein proximal local phenomenology, that is to operate, in so as to make its viably optimum adjustment, to the multiplicity of the general implicit perturbation, that is here to be implied, by such an increase of anti matter versus matter.  

What I mean by Ultimon Flow, is basically— The General dynamics, that govern the behavior of the substringular.